RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소득세 원천징수의무자의 납부책임 제한에 대한 소고 -미신고 및 과소신고납부시 판례 분석을 중심으로- = The Limitation of Liability of Withholding Agents of Income Tax-Focused on the Case Analysis in Case of Failure or under Withholding-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106288926

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The income tax withholding system is a system in which the payer of income collects and pays the tax from the taxpayer. Withholding system can bring complicated issues in the tax law because it has to consider three legal relations between withholding agent, the state, and withholding taxpayers, who are the beneficiaries of income. However, the withholding system provides the convenience of collection from the viewpoint of the tax authority, and the cases of withholding are expanded in this context. On the other hand, the more the application of the withholding tax is extended, the greater the burden of the withholding agent.
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the case of discussing the deletion of burden of taxation such as main tax and additional tax on the withholding agent in the actual case based on the case study and the precedent research related to the withholding tax system. Although there are various prior studies on the withholding system, this study is characterized in that it analyzes the related precedent only to the liability of the withholding agent. As a result of examining cases, cases related to interest income, dividend income, transferable income, earned income were selected. We analyzed them and tried to suggest the limitation of payment responsibility of the withholding taxpayers.
    As a result, various types of burdens such as classification of income, determination of who is the beneficiary, and calculation of the withholding tax amount have been found. Among them, the burden of the withholding obligation of the company due to the embezzlement by the representative and the withholding obligation to determination the beneficiary when the taxpayer is a non-resident, stick out. In some cases, it is possible to compare the burden of the taxpayer with the burden of the withholding agent who collect the tax amount instead.
    Some of the problems were supplemented by the interpretation of the statute by the court and the revision of the law. However, the burden of the company’s withholding obligation due to the embezzlement by the representative and the obligation of the withholding agent to determine the beneficiary remains a heavy burden. The nature of the withholding system is that the tax liability are automatically established and confirmed, and that the withholding tax amount can be specified immediately and clearly. The overburden of the withholding agent arises from the application of the withholding system to inadequate income types that do not match the nature of the withholding system.
    The withholding agent who bear the obligation to collect on behalf of the tax authority and bear the obligation to pay on behalf of the taxpayer, without any further compensation. Nonetheless, the withholding agent bear all responsibility for failure or under withholding. It is not desirable that withholding agent take responsible for the case what the tax authority can only obtain the withholding information through the investigation. It is necessary to improve the withholding system in order to reduce the burden on the withholding agent.
    번역하기

    The income tax withholding system is a system in which the payer of income collects and pays the tax from the taxpayer. Withholding system can bring complicated issues in the tax law because it has to consider three legal relations between withholding...

    The income tax withholding system is a system in which the payer of income collects and pays the tax from the taxpayer. Withholding system can bring complicated issues in the tax law because it has to consider three legal relations between withholding agent, the state, and withholding taxpayers, who are the beneficiaries of income. However, the withholding system provides the convenience of collection from the viewpoint of the tax authority, and the cases of withholding are expanded in this context. On the other hand, the more the application of the withholding tax is extended, the greater the burden of the withholding agent.
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the case of discussing the deletion of burden of taxation such as main tax and additional tax on the withholding agent in the actual case based on the case study and the precedent research related to the withholding tax system. Although there are various prior studies on the withholding system, this study is characterized in that it analyzes the related precedent only to the liability of the withholding agent. As a result of examining cases, cases related to interest income, dividend income, transferable income, earned income were selected. We analyzed them and tried to suggest the limitation of payment responsibility of the withholding taxpayers.
    As a result, various types of burdens such as classification of income, determination of who is the beneficiary, and calculation of the withholding tax amount have been found. Among them, the burden of the withholding obligation of the company due to the embezzlement by the representative and the withholding obligation to determination the beneficiary when the taxpayer is a non-resident, stick out. In some cases, it is possible to compare the burden of the taxpayer with the burden of the withholding agent who collect the tax amount instead.
    Some of the problems were supplemented by the interpretation of the statute by the court and the revision of the law. However, the burden of the company’s withholding obligation due to the embezzlement by the representative and the obligation of the withholding agent to determine the beneficiary remains a heavy burden. The nature of the withholding system is that the tax liability are automatically established and confirmed, and that the withholding tax amount can be specified immediately and clearly. The overburden of the withholding agent arises from the application of the withholding system to inadequate income types that do not match the nature of the withholding system.
    The withholding agent who bear the obligation to collect on behalf of the tax authority and bear the obligation to pay on behalf of the taxpayer, without any further compensation. Nonetheless, the withholding agent bear all responsibility for failure or under withholding. It is not desirable that withholding agent take responsible for the case what the tax authority can only obtain the withholding information through the investigation. It is necessary to improve the withholding system in order to reduce the burden on the withholding agent.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이철송, "현행 원천징수제도의 문제점" (여름) : 2005

    2 한국조세정책연구원, "한국조세연감" 2005

    3 소순무, "조세소송" 2018

    4 이준봉, "조세법총론" 2018

    5 강석규, "조세법쟁론" 2017

    6 임승순, "조세법" 2018

    7 신호영, "임직원 횡령시 상여처분 가부에 대한 판례의 문제점 고찰" 한국세법학회 18 (18): 277-326, 2012

    8 박상수, "원천징수제도의 문제점에 관한 연구 -소득처분에 의한 원천징수의무를 중심으로-" 5 (5): 2012

    9 강남규, "원천징수제도의 개선방안―원천징수의무자의 부담 완화를 중심으로―" 한국세법학회 13 (13): 77-113, 2007

    10 최원, "원천징수의무자의 경정청구권에 관한 해석론" 한국세법학회 18 (18): 54-128, 2012

    1 이철송, "현행 원천징수제도의 문제점" (여름) : 2005

    2 한국조세정책연구원, "한국조세연감" 2005

    3 소순무, "조세소송" 2018

    4 이준봉, "조세법총론" 2018

    5 강석규, "조세법쟁론" 2017

    6 임승순, "조세법" 2018

    7 신호영, "임직원 횡령시 상여처분 가부에 대한 판례의 문제점 고찰" 한국세법학회 18 (18): 277-326, 2012

    8 박상수, "원천징수제도의 문제점에 관한 연구 -소득처분에 의한 원천징수의무를 중심으로-" 5 (5): 2012

    9 강남규, "원천징수제도의 개선방안―원천징수의무자의 부담 완화를 중심으로―" 한국세법학회 13 (13): 77-113, 2007

    10 최원, "원천징수의무자의 경정청구권에 관한 해석론" 한국세법학회 18 (18): 54-128, 2012

    11 이재호, "원천징수의무의 한계와 경정청구" 4 : 2012

    12 최원, "원천징수의 법률관계에 관한 소고 - 원천징수의무와 원천납세의무를 중심으로 -" 한국조세연구포럼 15 (15): 7-38, 2015

    13 최원, "원천징수의 개념에 관한 소고" 한국조세연구포럼 11 (11): 7-54, 2011

    14 "영국 인터넷 기록보관소"

    15 "영국 HM Revenue & Customs"

    16 이창희, "세법강의" 2018

    17 송동진, "사외유출소득의 과세 및 반환에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 23 (23): 9-55, 2017

    18 "대법원 종합법률정보센터"

    19 백제흠, "국제거래에 대한 원천징수세제의 개선방안" 한국국제조세협회 34 (34): 1-53, 2018

    20 "국세법령정보시스템"

    21 李哲松, "法人 任·職員에 의한 橫領行爲의 課稅效果" 대한변호사협회 (311) : 2-, 2002

    22 国税庁, "平成31年版源泉徴収のしかた" 2018

    23 Chang Hee Lee, "Withholding Tax in the Era of BEPs, CIVs and Digital Economy" 103 : 2018

    24 Anuj C. Desai, "What a history of tax withholding tells us about the relationship between statutes and constitutional law" 108 (108): 2014

    25 財務省, "Comprehensive Handbook of Japanese Taxes 2010"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 1.03
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.37 1.48 1.713 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼