본 논문은 문헌연구를 통하여 경쟁력 강화, 성장, 상호호혜주의에 맞추어 FTA를 재구성하고 있는 EU의 무역정책의 특징을 살펴보고 이의 향후 전망을 하고자 한다. 농업 무역, EU 경쟁법, 정부...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106966809
2020
-
무역정책 ; 규제통합 ; EU ; Trade Policy ; WTO ; Regulatory Convergence ; FTA
323
KCI등재
학술저널
221-238(18쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
본 논문은 문헌연구를 통하여 경쟁력 강화, 성장, 상호호혜주의에 맞추어 FTA를 재구성하고 있는 EU의 무역정책의 특징을 살펴보고 이의 향후 전망을 하고자 한다. 농업 무역, EU 경쟁법, 정부...
본 논문은 문헌연구를 통하여 경쟁력 강화, 성장, 상호호혜주의에 맞추어 FTA를 재구성하고 있는 EU의 무역정책의 특징을 살펴보고 이의 향후 전망을 하고자 한다. 농업 무역, EU 경쟁법, 정부조달, 지적재산권 보호, 서비스 분야, 노동의 자유로운 이동 등의 무역정책의 의제를 다루면서 EU와 무역 파트너 국가와의 규제통합을 통하여 심층적이고 종합적인 진전 가능성을 살펴보았다. 또한, 무역과 인권, 노동 및 환경 기준, 공동외교안보정책하의 제한조치를 고려하면서 EU 무역정책의 향후 전망을 하였는데 가치와 경제적 이익 간 갈등, EU 주요 기관 간 서로 다른 선호, EU 회원국의 의회나 지방의회의 동의과정과 이에 따른 장기간의 토론과 비준과정으로 인한 어려움을 예상하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper examines the characteristics of EU trade policy, and intends to make its future prospects. It dealt with the agenda of EU trade policy such as agricultural trade, EU competition law, government procurement, intellectual property rights, ser...
This paper examines the characteristics of EU trade policy, and intends to make its future prospects. It dealt with the agenda of EU trade policy such as agricultural trade, EU competition law, government procurement, intellectual property rights, service sector, and free movement of labor, and examined the possibility of in-depth and comprehensive progress through regulatory convergence between the EU and trade partner countries. In addition, the future prospects for EU trade policy were taken into account, discussing trade and human rights, and labor and environmental standards. We anticipated conflicts between values and economic interests, different preferences among major EU agencies, and difficulties due to the long-term debate and ratification process of the EU member states national and regional parliaments.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 De Bièvre, D., "Why the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Is not (so) New, and Why It Is also not (so) Bad" 24 (24): 1506-1521, 2016
2 Eliasson, L. J., "Why TTIP Is an Unprecedented Geopolitical Game-Changer, but not a Polanyian Moment" 24 (24): 1522-1533, 2016
3 De Ville, F., "Why TTIP Is a Game-Changer and its Critics Have a Point" 24 (24): 1491-1505, 2016
4 Moerland, A., "Why Jamaica Wants to Protect Champagne: Intellectual Property Protection in EU Bilateral Trade Agreements" Wolf Legal Publishers 2013
5 Demedts, V., "Which Future for Competition in the Global Trade System: Competition Chapters in FTAs" 49 (49): 407-436, 2015
6 Jurje, F., "Trade Agreements as Venues for ‘Market Power Europe’? The Case of Immigration Policy" 52 (52): 320-336, 2014
7 GstÖhl, S., "The Trade Policy of the European Union" Palgrave 2018
8 Manners, I., "The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective" 14 (14): 785-803, 2009
9 Psychogiopoulou, E., "The External Dimension of EU Cultural Action and Free Trade: Exploring an Interface" 41 (41): 65-86, 2014
10 pshire, J., "Speaking with One Voice? The European Union’s Global Approach to Migration and Mobility and the Limits of International Migration Cooperation" 42 (42): 571-586, 2016
1 De Bièvre, D., "Why the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Is not (so) New, and Why It Is also not (so) Bad" 24 (24): 1506-1521, 2016
2 Eliasson, L. J., "Why TTIP Is an Unprecedented Geopolitical Game-Changer, but not a Polanyian Moment" 24 (24): 1522-1533, 2016
3 De Ville, F., "Why TTIP Is a Game-Changer and its Critics Have a Point" 24 (24): 1491-1505, 2016
4 Moerland, A., "Why Jamaica Wants to Protect Champagne: Intellectual Property Protection in EU Bilateral Trade Agreements" Wolf Legal Publishers 2013
5 Demedts, V., "Which Future for Competition in the Global Trade System: Competition Chapters in FTAs" 49 (49): 407-436, 2015
6 Jurje, F., "Trade Agreements as Venues for ‘Market Power Europe’? The Case of Immigration Policy" 52 (52): 320-336, 2014
7 GstÖhl, S., "The Trade Policy of the European Union" Palgrave 2018
8 Manners, I., "The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective" 14 (14): 785-803, 2009
9 Psychogiopoulou, E., "The External Dimension of EU Cultural Action and Free Trade: Exploring an Interface" 41 (41): 65-86, 2014
10 pshire, J., "Speaking with One Voice? The European Union’s Global Approach to Migration and Mobility and the Limits of International Migration Cooperation" 42 (42): 571-586, 2016
11 Portela, C., "Sanctions under the EU Generalized System of Preferences and Foreign Policy:Coherence by Accident?" 20 (20): 63-76, 2014
12 Hamilton, D., "Rule-Makers or Rule-Takers? An American Perspective on Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" 21 (21): 365-382, 2016
13 Daugbjerg, C., "Responding to Non-Linear Internationalization of Public Policy: The World Trade Organization and Reform of the CAP 1992-2013" 55 (55): 486-501, 2017
14 Aydin, U., "Promoting Competition: European Union and the Global Competition Order" 34 (34): 663-681, 2012
15 European Council, "Presidency Conclusions of the Seville European Council, 21 and 22 June 2002"
16 Young, A. R., "Not Your Parents’ Trade Politics: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations" 21 (21): 345-378, 2016
17 Manners, I., "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?" 40 (40): 235-258, 2002
18 Damro, C., "Market Power Europe" 19 (19): 682-699, 2012
19 Bossuyt, F., "Living Apart Together: EU Comprehensive Security from a Trade Perspective" 18 (18): 63-82, 2013
20 Young, A. R., "Liberalizing Trade, not Exporting Rules: The Limits to Regulatory Co-ordination in the EU’s ‘New Generation’ Preferential Trade Agreements" 22 (22): 1253-1275, 2015
21 Bronckers, M., "Is Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Superior to Litigation Before Domestic Courts? An EU View on Bilateral Trade Agreements" 18 (18): 655-677, 2015
22 Mckenzie, L., "Human Rights Conditionality in European Union Trade Negotiations:The Case of the EU-Singapore FTA" 55 (55): 832-849, 2017
23 Bartels, L., "Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches" Edward Elgar 73-91, 2015
24 European Commission, "Global Europe: Competing in the World. A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy"
25 Damro, C., "Eupopean Competition Policy and Globalization" Palgrave 2016
26 Marín Durán, G., "Environmental Integration in the EU’s External Relations" Hart Publishing 2012
27 Cornides, J., "EU Preferential Trade Agreements: Commerce, Foreign Policy, and Development Aspects" European University Institute 97-111, 2013
28 Hoffmeister, F., "EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis" Edward Elgar 76-88, 2016
29 Dickson-Smith, K. D., "Does the European Union Have New Clothes? Understanding the EU’s New Investment Treaty Model" 17 (17): 773-822, 2016
30 Postnikov, E., "Does Dialogue Work? The Effectiveness of Labor Standards in EU Preferential Trade Agreements" 21 (21): 923-940, 2014
31 Meissner, K. L., "Democratizing EU External Relations: The European Parliament’s Informal Role in SWIFT, ACTA, and TTIP" 21 (21): 269-288, 2016
32 European Commission, "Completing the Internal Market: White Paper from the Commission to the European Council (Milan, 28-29 June 1985)"
33 European Commission and High Representative, "A Renewed Partnership with the Countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific"
베트남 근로자의 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구 : 베트남 소재 한국기업에 근무하는 베트남 근로자를 대상으로
우리나라 수출입 전자 제조기업의 공급체인관리 역량과 재무적 성과에 관한 실증연구 : 생산관리역량의 매개효과를 중심으로
글로벌 가치사슬(GVC)이 한국의 해외직접투자에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-03-30 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Global Commerce And Cyber Trade -> International Commerce and Information Review | |
2007-03-13 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Korea Association For Global Commerce And Cyber Trade -> Korea Association for International Commerce and Information | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2003-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.99 | 1.02 | 1.213 | 0.33 |