RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      EU 무역정책의 특징과 향후 전망 = A Study on the Characteristics of EU Trade Policy and its Future Prospects

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106966809

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      본 논문은 문헌연구를 통하여 경쟁력 강화, 성장, 상호호혜주의에 맞추어 FTA를 재구성하고 있는 EU의 무역정책의 특징을 살펴보고 이의 향후 전망을 하고자 한다. 농업 무역, EU 경쟁법, 정부...

      본 논문은 문헌연구를 통하여 경쟁력 강화, 성장, 상호호혜주의에 맞추어 FTA를 재구성하고 있는 EU의 무역정책의 특징을 살펴보고 이의 향후 전망을 하고자 한다. 농업 무역, EU 경쟁법, 정부조달, 지적재산권 보호, 서비스 분야, 노동의 자유로운 이동 등의 무역정책의 의제를 다루면서 EU와 무역 파트너 국가와의 규제통합을 통하여 심층적이고 종합적인 진전 가능성을 살펴보았다. 또한, 무역과 인권, 노동 및 환경 기준, 공동외교안보정책하의 제한조치를 고려하면서 EU 무역정책의 향후 전망을 하였는데 가치와 경제적 이익 간 갈등, EU 주요 기관 간 서로 다른 선호, EU 회원국의 의회나 지방의회의 동의과정과 이에 따른 장기간의 토론과 비준과정으로 인한 어려움을 예상하였다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examines the characteristics of EU trade policy, and intends to make its future prospects. It dealt with the agenda of EU trade policy such as agricultural trade, EU competition law, government procurement, intellectual property rights, ser...

      This paper examines the characteristics of EU trade policy, and intends to make its future prospects. It dealt with the agenda of EU trade policy such as agricultural trade, EU competition law, government procurement, intellectual property rights, service sector, and free movement of labor, and examined the possibility of in-depth and comprehensive progress through regulatory convergence between the EU and trade partner countries. In addition, the future prospects for EU trade policy were taken into account, discussing trade and human rights, and labor and environmental standards. We anticipated conflicts between values and economic interests, different preferences among major EU agencies, and difficulties due to the long-term debate and ratification process of the EU member states national and regional parliaments.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. EU 무역정책의 특징 Ⅲ. EU 무역정책의 향후 전망 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. EU 무역정책의 특징 Ⅲ. EU 무역정책의 향후 전망 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌 ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 De Bièvre, D., "Why the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Is not (so) New, and Why It Is also not (so) Bad" 24 (24): 1506-1521, 2016

      2 Eliasson, L. J., "Why TTIP Is an Unprecedented Geopolitical Game-Changer, but not a Polanyian Moment" 24 (24): 1522-1533, 2016

      3 De Ville, F., "Why TTIP Is a Game-Changer and its Critics Have a Point" 24 (24): 1491-1505, 2016

      4 Moerland, A., "Why Jamaica Wants to Protect Champagne: Intellectual Property Protection in EU Bilateral Trade Agreements" Wolf Legal Publishers 2013

      5 Demedts, V., "Which Future for Competition in the Global Trade System: Competition Chapters in FTAs" 49 (49): 407-436, 2015

      6 Jurje, F., "Trade Agreements as Venues for ‘Market Power Europe’? The Case of Immigration Policy" 52 (52): 320-336, 2014

      7 GstÖhl, S., "The Trade Policy of the European Union" Palgrave 2018

      8 Manners, I., "The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective" 14 (14): 785-803, 2009

      9 Psychogiopoulou, E., "The External Dimension of EU Cultural Action and Free Trade: Exploring an Interface" 41 (41): 65-86, 2014

      10 pshire, J., "Speaking with One Voice? The European Union’s Global Approach to Migration and Mobility and the Limits of International Migration Cooperation" 42 (42): 571-586, 2016

      1 De Bièvre, D., "Why the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Is not (so) New, and Why It Is also not (so) Bad" 24 (24): 1506-1521, 2016

      2 Eliasson, L. J., "Why TTIP Is an Unprecedented Geopolitical Game-Changer, but not a Polanyian Moment" 24 (24): 1522-1533, 2016

      3 De Ville, F., "Why TTIP Is a Game-Changer and its Critics Have a Point" 24 (24): 1491-1505, 2016

      4 Moerland, A., "Why Jamaica Wants to Protect Champagne: Intellectual Property Protection in EU Bilateral Trade Agreements" Wolf Legal Publishers 2013

      5 Demedts, V., "Which Future for Competition in the Global Trade System: Competition Chapters in FTAs" 49 (49): 407-436, 2015

      6 Jurje, F., "Trade Agreements as Venues for ‘Market Power Europe’? The Case of Immigration Policy" 52 (52): 320-336, 2014

      7 GstÖhl, S., "The Trade Policy of the European Union" Palgrave 2018

      8 Manners, I., "The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective" 14 (14): 785-803, 2009

      9 Psychogiopoulou, E., "The External Dimension of EU Cultural Action and Free Trade: Exploring an Interface" 41 (41): 65-86, 2014

      10 pshire, J., "Speaking with One Voice? The European Union’s Global Approach to Migration and Mobility and the Limits of International Migration Cooperation" 42 (42): 571-586, 2016

      11 Portela, C., "Sanctions under the EU Generalized System of Preferences and Foreign Policy:Coherence by Accident?" 20 (20): 63-76, 2014

      12 Hamilton, D., "Rule-Makers or Rule-Takers? An American Perspective on Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership" 21 (21): 365-382, 2016

      13 Daugbjerg, C., "Responding to Non-Linear Internationalization of Public Policy: The World Trade Organization and Reform of the CAP 1992-2013" 55 (55): 486-501, 2017

      14 Aydin, U., "Promoting Competition: European Union and the Global Competition Order" 34 (34): 663-681, 2012

      15 European Council, "Presidency Conclusions of the Seville European Council, 21 and 22 June 2002"

      16 Young, A. R., "Not Your Parents’ Trade Politics: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations" 21 (21): 345-378, 2016

      17 Manners, I., "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?" 40 (40): 235-258, 2002

      18 Damro, C., "Market Power Europe" 19 (19): 682-699, 2012

      19 Bossuyt, F., "Living Apart Together: EU Comprehensive Security from a Trade Perspective" 18 (18): 63-82, 2013

      20 Young, A. R., "Liberalizing Trade, not Exporting Rules: The Limits to Regulatory Co-ordination in the EU’s ‘New Generation’ Preferential Trade Agreements" 22 (22): 1253-1275, 2015

      21 Bronckers, M., "Is Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Superior to Litigation Before Domestic Courts? An EU View on Bilateral Trade Agreements" 18 (18): 655-677, 2015

      22 Mckenzie, L., "Human Rights Conditionality in European Union Trade Negotiations:The Case of the EU-Singapore FTA" 55 (55): 832-849, 2017

      23 Bartels, L., "Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches" Edward Elgar 73-91, 2015

      24 European Commission, "Global Europe: Competing in the World. A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy"

      25 Damro, C., "Eupopean Competition Policy and Globalization" Palgrave 2016

      26 Marín Durán, G., "Environmental Integration in the EU’s External Relations" Hart Publishing 2012

      27 Cornides, J., "EU Preferential Trade Agreements: Commerce, Foreign Policy, and Development Aspects" European University Institute 97-111, 2013

      28 Hoffmeister, F., "EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis" Edward Elgar 76-88, 2016

      29 Dickson-Smith, K. D., "Does the European Union Have New Clothes? Understanding the EU’s New Investment Treaty Model" 17 (17): 773-822, 2016

      30 Postnikov, E., "Does Dialogue Work? The Effectiveness of Labor Standards in EU Preferential Trade Agreements" 21 (21): 923-940, 2014

      31 Meissner, K. L., "Democratizing EU External Relations: The European Parliament’s Informal Role in SWIFT, ACTA, and TTIP" 21 (21): 269-288, 2016

      32 European Commission, "Completing the Internal Market: White Paper from the Commission to the European Council (Milan, 28-29 June 1985)"

      33 European Commission and High Representative, "A Renewed Partnership with the Countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-03-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Global Commerce And Cyber Trade -> International Commerce and Information Review KCI등재
      2007-03-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association For Global Commerce And Cyber Trade -> Korea Association for International Commerce and Information KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.04 1.04 1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.99 1.02 1.213 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼