의학교육 수월성 제고를 위한 교육과정 재설계 = Curriculum Redesign for Excellence in Medical Education

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the medical education system of Korea and to propose a method of curriculum redesign. Although there have been many attempts by medical educators to improve the quality of medical education, the results have not been fruitful. First, there exists a limitation to the dualistic curriculum design based on Flexnerianism, and thus, this model does not provide an integrated experience to medical students. Therefore, we propose a unidimensional model for curriculum redesign. Second, it is impossible to promote excellence in medical education without solving the structural problems of teaching and learning, such as the teaching competency of the faculty, large-scale lectures, and team teaching systems. A curricular strategy that emphasizes mutual interaction and teaching accountability is necessary to promote meaningful learning. Third, the current clinical training system, the circulation model, provides incomplete training as well as a lack of sequence and articulation experiences. This system needs to be redesigned in a way that allows only those students who have mastered both the knowledge and the application of medical education to advance to the next step. Fourth, norm-referenced assessments of a medical college distort the learning process and create unconstructive system energy. A criterion-referenced assessment that values cooperation, independent study, and intrinsic motivation is more important for the reliability and validity of the assessment. Medical students should not focus on formative and informative learning. Medical colleges should investigate the multifaceted potential of the students and provide transformative learning to grow students into change agents. For this to take place, curriculum redesign-not new methods of medical education-is required.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Harden, R. M., "The integration ladder : A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation" 34 (34): 551-557, 2000

2 Christensen, C. M., "The innovator’s prescription: A disruptive solution for health care" McGraw-Hill 2008

3 Knowles, M., "The adult learner" Guf Publishing Company 1998

4 Ling, Y., "Retention of basic science information by senior medical students" 83 (83): S82-S85, 2008

5 Dressel, P. L., "On teaching and learning in college" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1982

6 Spring, L., "Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students’ well-being and academic outcomes" 45 (45): 867-877, 2011

7 Armstrong, E. G., "Creating"innovator’s DNA"in health care education" 88 (88): 343-348, 2013

8 Fosnet, C. T., "Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice" Teachers College Press 1996

9 Albanese, M. A., "Building a competency-based curriculum : The agony and the ecstasy" 15 (15): 439-454, 2010

10 Epstein, R. M., "Assessment in medical education" 356 (356): 387-396, 2007

11 Cooke, M., "American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report" 355 (355): 1339-1344, 2006

12 Boudreau, J. D., "Abraham Flexner’s"mooted question"and the story of integration" 85 (85): 378-383, 2010

13 Yang, E. B., "A strategy to activate the basic science education in medical school" 32 (32): 25-29, 2012