혐기소화 공정 및 원료 유형별 바이오가스 생산에 미치는 영향 = Effect of biogas production to different anaerobic digestion systems and feeding stocks

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective of this study was to investigate the effect of biogas production to different systems and feeding stocks. For the biogas production through operating the temperature phase anaerobic digestion(TPAD) with different feeding stocks, the stage state of biogas production with 70% of methane concentration in the thermophilic digestion tank with co-digestion of food waste and swine manure(40 : 60) was delayed at 3.5times, but its mesophilic tank was short for 5 days as relative to the swine manure. The cumulative methane production in the thermophilic digestion tank with co-digestion of food waste and swine manure was started with greater than its swine manure at 60 days after digestion periods. However, its mesophilic tank with swine manure was great at 3 days after digestion periods. For aspect of anaerobic digestion processes with swine manure, it was appeared that the stage state of biogas production rate in TPAD was shorter than the two phase anaerobic digestion system.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 TPAD(Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion)시스템〔고온조(55℃)와 중온조(35℃)〕과 이상혐기소화시스템〔중온조(35℃)와 중온조(35℃)〕공정을 비교하고, 이러한 공정을 적용한 유기성 자원별 바이오가스 생산량을 비교하는 것이었다. 원료별 TPAD시스템을 적용한 바이오가스 생산량을 비교해 볼 때, 고온조에서 돈분과 음식물류폐기물을 혼합한 원료를 사용한 경우는 돈분만 사용하였을 때 보다 혐기소화 공정의 안정화에 걸리는 기간은 3.5배가 지연되었지만, 중온조의 경우, 돈분과 음식물류폐기물을 혼용 처리하였을 때 메탄가스 농도 약 70%로 체류시간을 5일 앞당겨 안정화 단계에 도달하는 것으로 나타났다. 돈분과 음식물류폐기물을 혼합한 원료의 경우 고온조에서 혐기소화 60일을 기점으로, 또한 중온조의 경우 초기단계인 혐기소화 3일 후부터 돈분만 사용한 경우 보다 누적메탄가스 발생량이 많게 나타났다. 또한 혐기소화 공정측면에서 돈분을 이용한 TPAD시스템 운영은 이상혐기소화시스템 보다 조기에 공정의 안정화 단계에 도달하는 것으로 나타났다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 O.S.U., "“Ohio livestock manure and waster management guide”, Bulletin 604, Ohio State University Extension"

2 Classen, P. A. M., "Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers" 52 : 741-755, 1999

3 Kaiser S. K., "The temperature-phase anaerobic biofilter process" 29 (29): 213-223, 1994

4 Ministry of Environment, "The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005" 2005

5 Ministry of Environment, "The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2001" 2002

6 Chae K. J., "The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure" ELSEVIER SCI LTD 99 : 1-6, 2008

7 APHA, "Standard methods for the examination of waster and wastewater. 20th ed" APAH 1988

8 JoungDu Shin, "Predicting Methane Production Potential of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste" 대한환경공학회 13 (13): 93-97, 2008

9 신중두, "Potential Methane Production on Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste" 한국환경농학회 27 (27): 145-149, 2008

10 Sung S., "Performance of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system treating diary cattle wastes" 37 : 1628-1636, 2003

11 van Lier, J. B., "New perspectives in anaerobic digestion" 43 (43): 1-18, 2001

12 "Forordning(2001: 512)om deponering av avfall"

13 신항식, "Enhanced acidogenic fermentation of food waste in a continuous-flow reactor" 20 (20): 110-118, 200204

14 Callaghan, F. J., "Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure" 27 : 71-77, 2002

15 Lay J-J., "Biohydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline cellulose" 74 (74): 280-287, 2001

16 Hawkes, F. R., "Anaerobic digestion, In Basic Biotechnology" Academic Press 337-358, 1987

17 Ghosh, S., "Anaerobic acidogenesis of wastewater sludge" 47 (47): 30-45, 1975

18 Schafter P. L., "Advanced anaerobic digestion systems" 12 (12): 26-32, 2000