RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디자인 고착화 해소를 위한 패턴디자인 개발 교수 학습 모델 연구 : 생성형 인공지능 활용과 소비자 감성 만족 검증 중심으로 = A Teaching–Learning Model for Pattern Design Development Aimed at Overcoming Design Fixation : Application of Generative AI and Evaluation of Consumer Emotional Satisfaction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110101035

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to develop a teaching–learning model that alleviates design fixation and fosters creative outcomes in the pattern design development process. In particular, Generative Artificial Intelligence was integrated into the instructional process to verify differences before and after AI utilization, using emotional satisfaction as the main variable, and to identify directions for model improvement through in-depth learner interviews. The findings are as follows. First, the literature review revealed that previous studies on design fixation can be largely categorized into two types, while prior research on teaching methods utilizing generative AI can be divided into three main approaches. Second, the teaching–learning model designed in this study consists of six stages: exploration/understanding, ideation, concretization, critique, execution, and sharing. Third, when the model was applied to 23 learners and emotional satisfaction was analyzed for 10 randomly selected design outputs, statistically significant differences were found in motif, expression technique, and arrangement method between pre- and post-AI utilization. The level of emotional satisfaction was higher after employing AI in the design process.
      Finally, in-depth interview analysis showed that learners used various strategies to overcome design fixation. They also reported common difficulties in prompt formulation when using generative AI, suggesting the need for detailed prompt-writing instruction and terminology guides for style and visual expression. At the same time, learners demonstrated a critical and reflective attitude toward AI-generated outputs rather than relying on them unconditionally.
      번역하기

      This study aims to develop a teaching–learning model that alleviates design fixation and fosters creative outcomes in the pattern design development process. In particular, Generative Artificial Intelligence was integrated into the instructional pro...

      This study aims to develop a teaching–learning model that alleviates design fixation and fosters creative outcomes in the pattern design development process. In particular, Generative Artificial Intelligence was integrated into the instructional process to verify differences before and after AI utilization, using emotional satisfaction as the main variable, and to identify directions for model improvement through in-depth learner interviews. The findings are as follows. First, the literature review revealed that previous studies on design fixation can be largely categorized into two types, while prior research on teaching methods utilizing generative AI can be divided into three main approaches. Second, the teaching–learning model designed in this study consists of six stages: exploration/understanding, ideation, concretization, critique, execution, and sharing. Third, when the model was applied to 23 learners and emotional satisfaction was analyzed for 10 randomly selected design outputs, statistically significant differences were found in motif, expression technique, and arrangement method between pre- and post-AI utilization. The level of emotional satisfaction was higher after employing AI in the design process.
      Finally, in-depth interview analysis showed that learners used various strategies to overcome design fixation. They also reported common difficulties in prompt formulation when using generative AI, suggesting the need for detailed prompt-writing instruction and terminology guides for style and visual expression. At the same time, learners demonstrated a critical and reflective attitude toward AI-generated outputs rather than relying on them unconditionally.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼