RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    생활체육 투자우선순위에 관한 연구 = Decision making of the order of priority in mass sport investment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2025232

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to select factors of investment and to decide the order of priority among factors(of investment) based on fundamental principle of investment-equality, equity, and efficiency-in the development of sport for all.
    The study was conducted in expert group working at sport for all. 30 expert members who were 10 scholars, 10 administrators, and 10 men of business participated in the study.
    Data were collected through the use of Delphi-technique and Analytical hierarchy process method.
    The results of the study are as follows:
    7 factors of investment are selected in using Delphi-technique: facility, program, leader, publicity, organization of like-minded persons, administration aid, and etc.
    Facility factor is divided to close-range facility, broad area facility, occupational facility, open of school facility, management and utilization of facility, and open of public institution facility. Program factor is divided to program development by event and object, and program popularization. Leader factor is divided to pre-service(cultivation), in-service, arrangement, and better treatment of leader. Publicity factor is divided to community and nation-wide publicity. Organization of like-minded persons factor is divided to organization and aid of club. Administration aid factor is divided to opening of event, establishment of long-range plan and systematic research, fundation of consultation office, and law maintenance & aid of tax system in Sport for All.
    The order of priority among factors of investment is decided to AHP method.
    The whole ranking within Sport for All is followed facility, publicity, leader, administration aid organization, and program(CR=0.03061). The ranking within facility of Sport for All is followed expansion of close range facility, open of school facility, management and utilization of facility, expansion of occupational facility, open of occupational, and expansion of broad area facility(CR=0.00994). The ranking within program is followed is program development of object, program development of event, and program popularization(CR=0.001012). The ranking within leader is followed arrangement, pre-service, better treatment, and in-service(CR=0.00878). Nation-wide publicity is higher ranking than community (CR=0.00001). Club organization of like-minded persons is higher ranking than club aid(CR=0.00001). The ranking within administration aid is followed law maintenance & aid of tax system, establishment of long-range plan & systematic research, opening of event, and fundation of consultation office(CR=0.00427).

    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to select factors of investment and to decide the order of priority among factors(of investment) based on fundamental principle of investment-equality, equity, and efficiency-in the development of sport for all. The stud...

    The purpose of the study was to select factors of investment and to decide the order of priority among factors(of investment) based on fundamental principle of investment-equality, equity, and efficiency-in the development of sport for all.
    The study was conducted in expert group working at sport for all. 30 expert members who were 10 scholars, 10 administrators, and 10 men of business participated in the study.
    Data were collected through the use of Delphi-technique and Analytical hierarchy process method.
    The results of the study are as follows:
    7 factors of investment are selected in using Delphi-technique: facility, program, leader, publicity, organization of like-minded persons, administration aid, and etc.
    Facility factor is divided to close-range facility, broad area facility, occupational facility, open of school facility, management and utilization of facility, and open of public institution facility. Program factor is divided to program development by event and object, and program popularization. Leader factor is divided to pre-service(cultivation), in-service, arrangement, and better treatment of leader. Publicity factor is divided to community and nation-wide publicity. Organization of like-minded persons factor is divided to organization and aid of club. Administration aid factor is divided to opening of event, establishment of long-range plan and systematic research, fundation of consultation office, and law maintenance & aid of tax system in Sport for All.
    The order of priority among factors of investment is decided to AHP method.
    The whole ranking within Sport for All is followed facility, publicity, leader, administration aid organization, and program(CR=0.03061). The ranking within facility of Sport for All is followed expansion of close range facility, open of school facility, management and utilization of facility, expansion of occupational facility, open of occupational, and expansion of broad area facility(CR=0.00994). The ranking within program is followed is program development of object, program development of event, and program popularization(CR=0.001012). The ranking within leader is followed arrangement, pre-service, better treatment, and in-service(CR=0.00878). Nation-wide publicity is higher ranking than community (CR=0.00001). Club organization of like-minded persons is higher ranking than club aid(CR=0.00001). The ranking within administration aid is followed law maintenance & aid of tax system, establishment of long-range plan & systematic research, opening of event, and fundation of consultation office(CR=0.00427).

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼