동적 자동시야계를 이용한 양안 복시시야검사의 유용성 = Usefulness of the Binocular Double Vision Field Using Kinetic Automated Perimetry in Diplopia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: To compare the binocular double vision field for diplopia with Goldmann perimetry and Humphrey automated kinetic perimeter. Methods: Fifty of 70 healthy volunteers with no ocular problem wore the glasses of 14 prism diopters(PD)(7 prism lenses on both eyes, base-in), and 20 of the 70 wore the glasses of 20 PD(10 prism lenses on both eyes, base-out) and of 5 PD(only on right eye, base-up), and then esotropia, exotropia and hypertropia were induced in each group, respectively. Humphrey automated kinetic perimetry and Goldmann perimetry were performed simultaneously and their results were analyzed using mean degrees of meridians and binocular single vision(BSV) score. Results: Diplopia fields of Humphrey automated kinetic perimetry and Goldmann perimetry showed a similar overlap. Mean degree of meridians of Goldmann perimetry and Humphrey automated kinetic perimetry were 34.49/30.26, 32.08/28.31 and 31.93/27.09 degrees at esotropia, exotropia and hypertropia, respectively. BSV scores were 80.43/73.70, 74.34/67.13 and 67.16/62.13%, respectively. Diplopia field areas of Humphrey automated kinetic perimetry were significant larger than those of Goldmann (p<0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that if results of Humphrey automated kinetic perimetry are corrected by means of multiplying by 1.14, diplopia tests using Humphrey automated kinetic perimetry may be substituted for Goldmann perimetry.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "The study of normal visual field using Goldmann Module in OCTOPUS 101 automated perimetry in Koreans" 45 : 1123-7, 2004

2 "Streuung perimetrischer Untersuchumgsergebnisse" 161 : 180-6, 1970

3 "On automation of perimetry" 184 : 126-50, 1972

4 "Humphrey SITA and Octopus TOP perimetry on normal Korean subjects" 43 : 2034-41, 2002

5 "Functional scoring of the field of binocular single vision" 97 : 33-5, 1990

6 "Functional scoring of the field of binocualar single vision in patients with diplopia" 94 : 1554-61, 1987

7 "A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer Ⅱ" 104 : 1910-7, 1997

8 "A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma" 71 : 489-93, 1987

9 "A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter,the Humphrey Field Analyzer,and the Goldmann perimeter" 92 : 77-82, 1985

10 "A Comparison of Normal Visual Fields on the Mark I and Mark Ⅱ Humphrey Visual Field Analyzers" 37 : 1996