RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이 경영자 보상 계약에 미치는 영향 = A Valuation Role of Cash flows and Incentive Contracting

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104293600

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      본 연구는 기업이 현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높을 때 이를 경영자 보상계약에서 반영하는지 여부를 검증함으로써, 선행연구에서 상대적으로 소홀하게 다루었던 기업가치평가와 경영자 보상계약에서의 영업현금흐름의 정보적 가치를 분석하고 있다. 분석 결과, 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높은기업의 경우 경영자 보상계약에서 영업현금흐름의 가중치도 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 본 연구의 가설을 지지하는 결과로 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높은 기업의 경우 그렇지 않은 기업에비해 영업현금흐름의 증가에 경영의 초점을 맞추게 되고, 따라서 경영자로 하여금 영업현금흐름의증가에 보다 많은 노력을 기울이도록 보상계약을 체결함을 시사하고 있다. 다음으로 재벌기업여부가 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성과 보상관련성 간의 관계에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석한 결과, 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성과 경영자 보상에서의 영업현금흐름의 가중치 간 유의한 양의 연관관계는비재벌기업에서만 발견되고, 재벌기업에서는 유의성이 사라졌다. 이는 재벌기업에서는 지배구조의특성에 기인한 비효율성이 존재하여 기업가치 극대화를 위한 경영자 보상계약 설계가 이루어지고있지 않음을 보여 주고 있다. 본 연구는 경영자 보상계약에서 영업현금흐름에 대한 정보가 어떻게역할을 하는지 보여 줌으로써 관련 연구의 확장에 기여함과 동시에, 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이설명변수로서 종속변수인 기업의 특성에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써, 선행연구에 추가적인 공헌점을 가질 수 있다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 기업이 현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높을 때 이를 경영자 보상계약에서 반영하는지 여부를 검증함으로써, 선행연구에서 상대적으로 소홀하게 다루었던 기업가치평가와 경영자 보상...

      본 연구는 기업이 현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높을 때 이를 경영자 보상계약에서 반영하는지 여부를 검증함으로써, 선행연구에서 상대적으로 소홀하게 다루었던 기업가치평가와 경영자 보상계약에서의 영업현금흐름의 정보적 가치를 분석하고 있다. 분석 결과, 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높은기업의 경우 경영자 보상계약에서 영업현금흐름의 가중치도 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 본 연구의 가설을 지지하는 결과로 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이 높은 기업의 경우 그렇지 않은 기업에비해 영업현금흐름의 증가에 경영의 초점을 맞추게 되고, 따라서 경영자로 하여금 영업현금흐름의증가에 보다 많은 노력을 기울이도록 보상계약을 체결함을 시사하고 있다. 다음으로 재벌기업여부가 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성과 보상관련성 간의 관계에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석한 결과, 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성과 경영자 보상에서의 영업현금흐름의 가중치 간 유의한 양의 연관관계는비재벌기업에서만 발견되고, 재벌기업에서는 유의성이 사라졌다. 이는 재벌기업에서는 지배구조의특성에 기인한 비효율성이 존재하여 기업가치 극대화를 위한 경영자 보상계약 설계가 이루어지고있지 않음을 보여 주고 있다. 본 연구는 경영자 보상계약에서 영업현금흐름에 대한 정보가 어떻게역할을 하는지 보여 줌으로써 관련 연구의 확장에 기여함과 동시에, 영업현금흐름의 가치관련성이설명변수로서 종속변수인 기업의 특성에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써, 선행연구에 추가적인 공헌점을 가질 수 있다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this study, I investigate the role of cash flow from operation (CFO) in performance evaluationpurposes. Earnings and CFO are the recognized accounting indicators of firm performance.
      Anecdotal and research evidence have established that earnings and cash flows have differentialimplications for firm performance. While the literature is replete with research that show thecontracting role of earnings, evidence on the relevance of CFO in incentive contracting is sparseand weak. The incentive plans of noted companies justify the link between CFO and executivereward on the logic that CFO is a key driver of success and stock return. From a valuation pointof view, CFO is useful because it is one of a key component of the firm performance. Marketparticipants, therefore, use the signal to update their beliefs about the outcome. So from acontracting point of view, management cash compensation would be sensitive to value relevanceof CFO. Using compensation and accounting data for a number of Korean firms over an 9-yearperiod from 2001 to 2009, I find that pay-sensitivity of CFO is higher for firms that exhibit highvalue relevance of CFO. Next, I examine whether the association between value relevance andcompensation weights of CFO is different between chaebol firms and non-chaebol firms. Thecontrolling families of a chaebol group have been criticized for running the affiliated firms as avehicle to enrich their own personal wealth, and not necessarily the wealth of shareholders in thoseindividual companies. It has been alleged that a chaebol sometimes instructs its member firm totransfer wealth to a member firm under financial distress via illegal related-party transactions.
      Such ‘tunneling’ may be consistent with the interest of the controlling family and the group as awhole yet it is done at the expense of the minority shareholders of the firm. There are two papersclosely related to my second project. Campbell and Keys (2002) show that chaebol firms underperformnon-chaebol firms financially and that top executive turnover is not significantly relatedto firm performance for chaebol firms whereas it is for non-chaebol firms, suggesting that ifgroup chairman or controlling shareholder mandates top executives to pursue the interest ofchaebol as a whole, executive turnover might be insensitive to individual firm-level performance.
      Kato et al. (2007) have found that cash compensation of Korean executives is significantly relatedto stock market performance only for non-chaebol firms, not for chaebol firms. Such evidencesuggests that if top executives of chaebol are mandated to pursue the interests of the overall group, and not the shareholders’ interest of the firm they work for, their cash compensation would be lesssensitive to value relevance of CFO, compared to those firms unaffiliated to any chaebol group.
      I find that the association between value relevance and compensation weights of CFO remains stillsignificant only in non-chaebol firms, whereas the significance disappears in the chaebol firms,supporting for the hypothesis.
      번역하기

      In this study, I investigate the role of cash flow from operation (CFO) in performance evaluationpurposes. Earnings and CFO are the recognized accounting indicators of firm performance. Anecdotal and research evidence have established that earnings a...

      In this study, I investigate the role of cash flow from operation (CFO) in performance evaluationpurposes. Earnings and CFO are the recognized accounting indicators of firm performance.
      Anecdotal and research evidence have established that earnings and cash flows have differentialimplications for firm performance. While the literature is replete with research that show thecontracting role of earnings, evidence on the relevance of CFO in incentive contracting is sparseand weak. The incentive plans of noted companies justify the link between CFO and executivereward on the logic that CFO is a key driver of success and stock return. From a valuation pointof view, CFO is useful because it is one of a key component of the firm performance. Marketparticipants, therefore, use the signal to update their beliefs about the outcome. So from acontracting point of view, management cash compensation would be sensitive to value relevanceof CFO. Using compensation and accounting data for a number of Korean firms over an 9-yearperiod from 2001 to 2009, I find that pay-sensitivity of CFO is higher for firms that exhibit highvalue relevance of CFO. Next, I examine whether the association between value relevance andcompensation weights of CFO is different between chaebol firms and non-chaebol firms. Thecontrolling families of a chaebol group have been criticized for running the affiliated firms as avehicle to enrich their own personal wealth, and not necessarily the wealth of shareholders in thoseindividual companies. It has been alleged that a chaebol sometimes instructs its member firm totransfer wealth to a member firm under financial distress via illegal related-party transactions.
      Such ‘tunneling’ may be consistent with the interest of the controlling family and the group as awhole yet it is done at the expense of the minority shareholders of the firm. There are two papersclosely related to my second project. Campbell and Keys (2002) show that chaebol firms underperformnon-chaebol firms financially and that top executive turnover is not significantly relatedto firm performance for chaebol firms whereas it is for non-chaebol firms, suggesting that ifgroup chairman or controlling shareholder mandates top executives to pursue the interest ofchaebol as a whole, executive turnover might be insensitive to individual firm-level performance.
      Kato et al. (2007) have found that cash compensation of Korean executives is significantly relatedto stock market performance only for non-chaebol firms, not for chaebol firms. Such evidencesuggests that if top executives of chaebol are mandated to pursue the interests of the overall group, and not the shareholders’ interest of the firm they work for, their cash compensation would be lesssensitive to value relevance of CFO, compared to those firms unaffiliated to any chaebol group.
      I find that the association between value relevance and compensation weights of CFO remains stillsignificant only in non-chaebol firms, whereas the significance disappears in the chaebol firms,supporting for the hypothesis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bae, K. H., "Tunneling or value added? evidence from mergers by Korean business groups" 57 (57): 2695-2740, 2002

      2 Dikolli, S. S, "Transient institutional ownership and CEO contracting" 84 (84): 737-770, 2009

      3 Bae, K. H., "The value-relevance of earnings and book value, ownership structure, and business group affiliation:evidence from Korean business groups" 34 (34): 740-766, 2007

      4 Lambert, "The use of accounting and security price measures of performance in managerial compensation contracts:a discussion" 16 (16): 101-123, 1993

      5 Ali, A., "The incremental information content of earnings, working capital from operations and cash flows" 32 (32): 61-74, 1994

      6 Healy, P., "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions" 7 (7): 85-107, 1985

      7 Dechow, P., "The Relation between Earnings and Cash Flows" 25 (25): 133-168, 1998

      8 Chang, S. J, "Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups :a transaction cost approach" 37 (37): 141-158, 1988

      9 Dutta, S., "Stock price, earnings, and book value in managerial performance measures" 80 (80): 1069-1100, 2005

      10 Perry, T., "Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts" 63 (63): 453-488, 2001

      1 Bae, K. H., "Tunneling or value added? evidence from mergers by Korean business groups" 57 (57): 2695-2740, 2002

      2 Dikolli, S. S, "Transient institutional ownership and CEO contracting" 84 (84): 737-770, 2009

      3 Bae, K. H., "The value-relevance of earnings and book value, ownership structure, and business group affiliation:evidence from Korean business groups" 34 (34): 740-766, 2007

      4 Lambert, "The use of accounting and security price measures of performance in managerial compensation contracts:a discussion" 16 (16): 101-123, 1993

      5 Ali, A., "The incremental information content of earnings, working capital from operations and cash flows" 32 (32): 61-74, 1994

      6 Healy, P., "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions" 7 (7): 85-107, 1985

      7 Dechow, P., "The Relation between Earnings and Cash Flows" 25 (25): 133-168, 1998

      8 Chang, S. J, "Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups :a transaction cost approach" 37 (37): 141-158, 1988

      9 Dutta, S., "Stock price, earnings, and book value in managerial performance measures" 80 (80): 1069-1100, 2005

      10 Perry, T., "Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts" 63 (63): 453-488, 2001

      11 Chang, S. J., "Ownership structure, expropriation and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea" 46 (46): 238-253, 2003

      12 Kim, J. B, "Ownership structure, business group affiliation, listing status, and earnings management:evidence from Korea" 23 (23): 427-464, 2010

      13 Paul, J., "On the efficiency of stock-based compensation" 5 (5): 471-502, 1992

      14 Caylor, M. L, "Is the value relevance of earnings conditional on the timing of earnings information?" 26 (26): 62-95, 2007

      15 Banker, D, "Incentive contracting and value relevance of earnings and cash flows" 47 (47): 647-678, 2009

      16 Kato, T., "Executive compensation, firm performance, and chaebols in Korea:Evidence from new panel data" 15 (15): 36-55, 2007

      17 Bowen, R, "Evidence on the relationships between earnings and various measures of cash flow" 61 : 713-725, 1986

      18 Petersen, M. A, "Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets:comparing approaches" 22 (22): 435-480, 2009

      19 Chang, S. J., "Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea:intergroup-resource sharing and internal business transactions" 43 (43): 429-448, 2000

      20 Huang, Y., "Earnings and cash flows in CEO annual bonus contracts" 2013

      21 Sloan, R., "Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?" 71 : 289-316, 1996

      22 Campbell II, T. L, "Corporate governance in south Korea:the Chaebol experience" 8 (8): 373-391, 2002

      23 Lambert, R., "Contracting theory in accounting" 32 (32): 3-87, 2001

      24 Collins, D. W., "Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years" 24 (24): 39-67, 1997

      25 Ashbaugh, H., "An exploratory study of the valuation properties of crosslisted firms’ IAS and US GAAP earnings and book values" 77 (77): 107-126, 2002

      26 Lambert, R., "An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts" 25 (25): 85-129, 1987

      27 Bushman, R., "An analysis of the relation between the stewardship and valuation roles of earnings" 44 (44): 53-83, 2006

      28 Dikolli, S. S., "Agent employment horizons and contracting demand for forward-looking performance measures" 39 (39): 481-494, 2001

      29 Gaver, J. J, "Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management" 19 (19): 3-28, 1995

      30 Jackson, S, "Accounting fundamentals and CEO bonus compensation" 27 : 374-393, 2008

      31 Gjesdal, F., "Accounting for stewardship" 19 (19): 208-231, 1981

      32 Dechow, P., "Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance:the role of accounting accruals" 18 (18): 3-42, 1994

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼