RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공학철학 연구 - 공학적 지식을 중심으로 = A Study on Philosophy of Engineering : Focusing on Engineering Knowledge

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106173766

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of the engineering knowledge demonstrated by the airplane invention process carried out by the Wright brothers. In this paper, I examined the process in which the Wright brothers succeeded in piloting and building airplanes by utilizing birds, kites, bicycles, and gliders, and creating their own unique testing method, the wind tunnel. The writer analyzed the engineering knowledge of the Wright brothers from the perspective of Koen’s engineering methods and Polanyi’s concepts of tacit knowledge and analogy.
    Based on Koen, the term “engineering method” refers to the strategy that results in the best possible outcome in a poorly understood or uncertain situation using the available resources. The Wright brothers produced the best possible results with the available resources in an uncertain situation at a time when most experts failed to build airplanes, and their results changed the world significantly.
    Polanyi argues that tacit knowledge plays an important role in the process of discovery. Implicit knowledge presupposes the proposition that we know more than we can express. In addition to the type of knowledge that we can express, there is an “unspeakable” knowledge that is not easily determined or clearly articulated.
    The Wright brothers learned the art of balance and steering while flying kites and cycling, as well as studying theoretical concepts during the plane’s production process; they also studied the relationship between the plane’s wings and wind by observing birds. The Wright brothers’ airplane construction and discovery are good examples of analogy reasoning. When knowledge is scarce, ubiquitousism may prove useful. In a situation where knowledge has not accumulated and only abstract knowledge can solve the problem, analogy reasoning replaces core knowledge.
    The Wright brothers’ demonstration of engineering knowledge in the piloting and construction of airplanes reveals characteristics of the analogy method and the use of tacit knowledge to generate the best possible results and change the world using the available resources in an uncertain situation.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of the engineering knowledge demonstrated by the airplane invention process carried out by the Wright brothers. In this paper, I examined the process in which the Wright brothers succeeded in...

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of the engineering knowledge demonstrated by the airplane invention process carried out by the Wright brothers. In this paper, I examined the process in which the Wright brothers succeeded in piloting and building airplanes by utilizing birds, kites, bicycles, and gliders, and creating their own unique testing method, the wind tunnel. The writer analyzed the engineering knowledge of the Wright brothers from the perspective of Koen’s engineering methods and Polanyi’s concepts of tacit knowledge and analogy.
    Based on Koen, the term “engineering method” refers to the strategy that results in the best possible outcome in a poorly understood or uncertain situation using the available resources. The Wright brothers produced the best possible results with the available resources in an uncertain situation at a time when most experts failed to build airplanes, and their results changed the world significantly.
    Polanyi argues that tacit knowledge plays an important role in the process of discovery. Implicit knowledge presupposes the proposition that we know more than we can express. In addition to the type of knowledge that we can express, there is an “unspeakable” knowledge that is not easily determined or clearly articulated.
    The Wright brothers learned the art of balance and steering while flying kites and cycling, as well as studying theoretical concepts during the plane’s production process; they also studied the relationship between the plane’s wings and wind by observing birds. The Wright brothers’ airplane construction and discovery are good examples of analogy reasoning. When knowledge is scarce, ubiquitousism may prove useful. In a situation where knowledge has not accumulated and only abstract knowledge can solve the problem, analogy reasoning replaces core knowledge.
    The Wright brothers’ demonstration of engineering knowledge in the piloting and construction of airplanes reveals characteristics of the analogy method and the use of tacit knowledge to generate the best possible results and change the world using the available resources in an uncertain situation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이충완, "학습용 소형 풍동의 성능 평가" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2006

    2 마이클 폴라니 M, "지적 자유와 의미" 범양사 1992

    3 송성수, "인류 최초의 동력비행에 성공한 라이트 형제" 44 (44): 2004

    4 안호영, "융복합 교육으로서의 과학 교양교육-동국대학교 경주캠퍼스 과학 융복합 교양교육 사례를 중심으로" 한국문화융합학회 37 (37): 61-92, 2015

    5 서정일, "문화융합의 기초로서의 인문고전 교육의 의미" 한국문화융합학회 38 (38): 39-65, 2016

    6 돈 벌리너, "목숨을 건 도전 비행" 지호 2002

    7 구삼욱, "라이트 형제, 그 존경스러운 이름에 대한 무모한 언급" 한국항공우주학회 5 (5): 2011

    8 데이비드 매컬로, "라이트 형제" 도서출판 승산 2015

    9 김성원, "근질거리는 나의 손" 소나무 2015

    10 박영기, "과학으로 만드는 비행기" 지성사 2008

    1 이충완, "학습용 소형 풍동의 성능 평가" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2006

    2 마이클 폴라니 M, "지적 자유와 의미" 범양사 1992

    3 송성수, "인류 최초의 동력비행에 성공한 라이트 형제" 44 (44): 2004

    4 안호영, "융복합 교육으로서의 과학 교양교육-동국대학교 경주캠퍼스 과학 융복합 교양교육 사례를 중심으로" 한국문화융합학회 37 (37): 61-92, 2015

    5 서정일, "문화융합의 기초로서의 인문고전 교육의 의미" 한국문화융합학회 38 (38): 39-65, 2016

    6 돈 벌리너, "목숨을 건 도전 비행" 지호 2002

    7 구삼욱, "라이트 형제, 그 존경스러운 이름에 대한 무모한 언급" 한국항공우주학회 5 (5): 2011

    8 데이비드 매컬로, "라이트 형제" 도서출판 승산 2015

    9 김성원, "근질거리는 나의 손" 소나무 2015

    10 박영기, "과학으로 만드는 비행기" 지성사 2008

    11 부치아렐리, "공학철학" 서광사 2015

    12 "https://www.wdl.org/en/item/11373/"

    13 "http://news.ebs.co.kr/ebsnews/allView/10998598/H"

    14 "http://dbr.donga.com/article/view/1901/article_no/5703"

    15 Jakab, Peter L, "Visions of a Flying Machine: The Wright Brothers and the Process of Invention" Smithsonian Books 2014

    16 Gibbs-Smith, C.H, "The Wright Brothers: Aviation Pioneers and Their Work, 1899–1911" Science Museum, NMSI Trading Ltd 2002

    17 Polanyi, M, "The Tacit Dimension" The University of chicago Press 2009

    18 Wright, W., "The Papers of Wilbur and Orville Wright: Including the Chanute-Wright Letters and Other Papers of Octave Chanute" McGraw-Hill Pro-fessional 2001

    19 Wright, O, "The Early History of the Airplane" CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform 2013

    20 유연상, "Polanyi의 인식론에 함의된 교수의 성격" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2003

    21 Polanyi, M, "Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1958

    22 Holyoak Keith J, "Paul Thagard, Mental Leaps : Anology in Creative Throught" MIT Press 1996

    23 Bereiter, Carl, "Innovation in the Absence of Principled Knowledge:The Case of the Wright Brothers" 18 (18): 2009

    24 Heppenheimer, T.A, "First Flight: The Wright Brothers and the Invention of the Airplane" Wiley 2003

    25 Koen, B. V, "Discussion of the Method: Conducting the Engineer's Approach to Problem Solving" Oxford University Press 2003

    26 Lilienthal, Otto, "Der Vogelflug als Grundlage der Fliegekunst: Ein Beitrag Zur Systematik Der Flugtechnik(1889)" Kessinger Publishing, LLC 2010

    27 Koen, B. V, "Definition of the engineering method" American Society for Engineering Education 1985

    28 Crouch, T.D, "A Dream of Wings: Americans and the Airplane, 1875–1905" W.W. Norton & Company 2002

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-03-24 학술지명변경 한글명 : 문화와 융합 -> 문화와융합 KCI등재
    2022-03-16 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence -> The Society of Korean Culture and Convergence KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2014-03-04 학회명변경 한글명 : 문학과언어학회 -> 한국문화융합학회
    영문명 : Munhak Kwa Eoneo Hakhoi -> The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0 0 0
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0 0 0 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼