RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      헤지펀드에 관한 규제 = Regulation about a hedge fund

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104716083

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purposes to regulate hedge funds is "Protection of investor" and "security of the safety of a financial system". The former is regulation protect an investor from hedge funds with a high system risk. The regulation of investor's eligible for investment and the anti-fraud regulation of fund advisor and the substantial information disclosure to an investor hits here. The latter is regulation for avoiding actualization of a system risk. The British-American regulatory agency has superintended the crisis management about the hedge fund and the capital requirement about business counterpart of hedge fund on indirect regulation. Exemption regulation etc. are different for each country. In many states introduce direct regulation such as a fund advisor's registration system and a reporting system to a regulatory agency. But there are very few countries which merely set the hedge fund itself as the direct regulation object.
      The private offering set investment mechanism for a proper investor on Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act(hereinafter korean hedge fund) has a figure as a hedge fund of the initial introduction stage. In order to demonstrate the economical strong point which the hedge fund has, the legislation complement of advanced deregulation must be realized.
      Below, I will suggest the proposal of revision of the regulation about a korean hedge fund conclusively.
      The first, a hedge fund and a re-indirect hedge fund(fund of funds) are classified with regulating. A hedge fund is made into the object of regulation in part with respect to a system risk today. Fundamentally it is needs to minimize the regulation on the hedge fund so that the maximization of the strong point of hedge fund may be carried out. However, probably, a re-indirect hedge fund(fund of funds) must be regulated to accumulate a general protection of investor. It is necessary to make it restrict short selling and a leverage in principle to a re-indirect hedge fund(fund of funds).
      The second, an important hedge fund on financial system shall be registered as in duty bound. When calling it an important hedge fund on financial system it is necessary to make it disclose and report information, including the leverage about a system risk etc.. In EU it is regards the hedge fund more than 100 millions euro as important hedge fund on a financial system.
      The Third, which needs to improve money borrowing and a derivative dealing situation report system on Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act. There are few states regulated so that money borrowing and derivative dealings may be directly reported to regulatory authority relatively. Too much money borrowing is must regulate. It is considered that it can achieve by regulating the bank and a prime broker which are business counterpart of hedge fund.
      The fourth, a borrowing short selling is considered desirable to the hedge fund. The check duty is strengthened and carrying out pricing regulation by Uptick Rule looks desirable.
      The Fifth, in order to expect the accuracy evaluation of the so-called low liquidity assets, it is necessary to disclose the composition property of the low liquidity-assets and the method of evaluating the property concerned etc. An conflict of interest generate that a hedge fund advisor does the evaluate property himself. Therefore, which utilizes the evaluation organization of the 3rd person of the exterior is considered.
      번역하기

      The purposes to regulate hedge funds is "Protection of investor" and "security of the safety of a financial system". The former is regulation protect an investor from hedge funds with a high system risk. The regulation of investor's eligible for inves...

      The purposes to regulate hedge funds is "Protection of investor" and "security of the safety of a financial system". The former is regulation protect an investor from hedge funds with a high system risk. The regulation of investor's eligible for investment and the anti-fraud regulation of fund advisor and the substantial information disclosure to an investor hits here. The latter is regulation for avoiding actualization of a system risk. The British-American regulatory agency has superintended the crisis management about the hedge fund and the capital requirement about business counterpart of hedge fund on indirect regulation. Exemption regulation etc. are different for each country. In many states introduce direct regulation such as a fund advisor's registration system and a reporting system to a regulatory agency. But there are very few countries which merely set the hedge fund itself as the direct regulation object.
      The private offering set investment mechanism for a proper investor on Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act(hereinafter korean hedge fund) has a figure as a hedge fund of the initial introduction stage. In order to demonstrate the economical strong point which the hedge fund has, the legislation complement of advanced deregulation must be realized.
      Below, I will suggest the proposal of revision of the regulation about a korean hedge fund conclusively.
      The first, a hedge fund and a re-indirect hedge fund(fund of funds) are classified with regulating. A hedge fund is made into the object of regulation in part with respect to a system risk today. Fundamentally it is needs to minimize the regulation on the hedge fund so that the maximization of the strong point of hedge fund may be carried out. However, probably, a re-indirect hedge fund(fund of funds) must be regulated to accumulate a general protection of investor. It is necessary to make it restrict short selling and a leverage in principle to a re-indirect hedge fund(fund of funds).
      The second, an important hedge fund on financial system shall be registered as in duty bound. When calling it an important hedge fund on financial system it is necessary to make it disclose and report information, including the leverage about a system risk etc.. In EU it is regards the hedge fund more than 100 millions euro as important hedge fund on a financial system.
      The Third, which needs to improve money borrowing and a derivative dealing situation report system on Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act. There are few states regulated so that money borrowing and derivative dealings may be directly reported to regulatory authority relatively. Too much money borrowing is must regulate. It is considered that it can achieve by regulating the bank and a prime broker which are business counterpart of hedge fund.
      The fourth, a borrowing short selling is considered desirable to the hedge fund. The check duty is strengthened and carrying out pricing regulation by Uptick Rule looks desirable.
      The Fifth, in order to expect the accuracy evaluation of the so-called low liquidity assets, it is necessary to disclose the composition property of the low liquidity-assets and the method of evaluating the property concerned etc. An conflict of interest generate that a hedge fund advisor does the evaluate property himself. Therefore, which utilizes the evaluation organization of the 3rd person of the exterior is considered.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신석훈, "회사소유-지배 괴리현상에 대한 법경제학적 접근" 한국경제법학회 2009

      2 최민용, "헤지펀드의 도입과 규제에 관한 고찰" 한국상사판례학회 20 (20): 825-861, 2007

      3 노희진, "헤지펀드의 국내 허용 방안" 한국증권연구원 2009

      4 이호진, "헤지펀드에 대한 주요국 규제동향과 정책적 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원 2006

      5 한정미, "헤지펀드 도입논의와 자본시장법의 과제" 한국기업법학회 22 (22): 339-381, 2008

      6 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법 [주석서 Ⅱ]" 박영사 2009

      7 김건식, "자본시장법" 두성사 2009

      8 하삼주, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률상 금융투자상품의 개념" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 365-397, 2007

      9 이상복, "외국의 공매도규제와 법적 시사점* -금융위기 이후 영국과 미국의 규제를 중심으로-" 한국증권법학회 10 (10): 53-104, 2009

      10 김민석, "서브프라임 사태의 금융시장 파급경로 분석 및 정책적 시사점" 한국증권연구원 2007

      1 신석훈, "회사소유-지배 괴리현상에 대한 법경제학적 접근" 한국경제법학회 2009

      2 최민용, "헤지펀드의 도입과 규제에 관한 고찰" 한국상사판례학회 20 (20): 825-861, 2007

      3 노희진, "헤지펀드의 국내 허용 방안" 한국증권연구원 2009

      4 이호진, "헤지펀드에 대한 주요국 규제동향과 정책적 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원 2006

      5 한정미, "헤지펀드 도입논의와 자본시장법의 과제" 한국기업법학회 22 (22): 339-381, 2008

      6 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법 [주석서 Ⅱ]" 박영사 2009

      7 김건식, "자본시장법" 두성사 2009

      8 하삼주, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률상 금융투자상품의 개념" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 365-397, 2007

      9 이상복, "외국의 공매도규제와 법적 시사점* -금융위기 이후 영국과 미국의 규제를 중심으로-" 한국증권법학회 10 (10): 53-104, 2009

      10 김민석, "서브프라임 사태의 금융시장 파급경로 분석 및 정책적 시사점" 한국증권연구원 2007

      11 송종준, "미국의 헤지펀드 규제와 법적 시사점" 한국증권법학회 7 (7): 49-99, 2006

      12 김화진, "기업 경영권 시장과 헤지펀드" 법학연구소 48 (48): 236-279, 2007

      13 성희활, "글로벌 금융위기에 따른 공매도 규제의 변화와 시사점 -최근 미국의 공매도 규제 변화를 중심으로-" 한양법학회 (27) : 213-243, 2009

      14 杉田浩治, "金融規制改革についての欧州の考え方-ド・ラロジエ-ル・レポ-トの要旨" 49 (49): 2009

      15 林在淵, "資本市場法" 박영사 2010

      16 吉田 健一郎, "英金融街シティの地盤沈下は本当か"

      17 林在淵, "美國證券法" 박영사 2009

      18 若園智明, "欧米における金融規制改革の動向と限界" 49 (49): 2009

      19 小立敬, "本格化する国際的な金融制度改革"

      20 堀江貞之, "世界のヘッジファンドを巡る最近の規制環境動向" 野村総合研究所 金融ITイノベ―ション硏究部 2008

      21 大崎貞和, "アメリカにおける投資ファンドの規制" 3 : 2008

      22 박진호, "“헤지펀드 위험요소와 투자자보호”, 「헤지펀드 관련 금융투자법제의 구조와 개선방안」" 2008

      23 EFAMA, "Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry in the Fourth Quarter of 2008 and Results for the Full Year 2008" Quarterly Statistical Release 2008

      24 U.S Department of Treasury, "Treasury Outlines Framework For Regulatory Reform : Provides new Rules of the Road, focuses first on containing systemic risk"

      25 Jacques de Larosière, "Report : The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU"

      26 Hedge Fund Law Blog, "Proposed Hedge Fund Registration Bill Now Excludes VC Funds"

      27 Ryan Sklar, "Note: Hedges or Thickets: Protecting Investors from Hedge Fund Managers' Conflicts of Interest" 77 : 3251-, 2009

      28 "London Summit – Leaders’ Statement"

      29 Harold S. Bloomenthal, "International Capital Markets and Securities Regulation Database updated November 2009" 2009

      30 MEDIA RELEASE, "IOSCO publishes principles for hedge funds regulation(IOSCO/MR/12/2009)"

      31 Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions, "Hedge Funds Oversight Final Report" 2009

      32 Technical Committee of The International Organization of Securities Commissions, "Hedge Funds Oversight Consultation Report"

      33 William A. Roach, Jr., "Hedge Fund Regulation: “What Side of the Hedges are You on?”" 40 : 165-, 2009

      34 John P. Hunt, "Hedge Fund Regulation: The President's Working Group Committees' Best Practices Reports--Raising the Bar but Missing Risks" 1-, 2008

      35 Article, "Hedge Fund Industry Criticises Proposed Directive" 30 (30): 233-, 2009

      36 Douglas Cumming, "Hedge Fund Forum Shopping" 10 : 783-, 2008

      37 "Financial services: Commission proposes EU framework for managers of alternative investment funds" 2009

      38 Group of Thirty, "Financial Reform A Framework for Financial Stability"

      39 "Compliance Building, Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act of 2009"

      40 Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2004/39/EC and 2009/…/EC("Commission AIF Proposal"), "Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2004/39/EC and 2009/…/EC ("Commission AIF Proposal")"

      41 George Sami, "Comment, A Comparative Analysis of Hedge Fund Regulation in the United States and Europe" 29 : 275-, 2009

      42 "Article, EU Framework or Managers of Alternative Investment Funds Proposed, EU Focus 2009, 254, 15"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.95
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.81 0.75 0.922 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼