RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It was from Engels when an individual became the object of concern away from a group studied family, where he started from the premise that the family is the place of "the conflict and the struggle".
By the explanation of Parsons on contemporary family ,the contemporary family was characterized as nuclear family relating the major changes in family structures and functions with industrialization.
However the marxists claim that the role of sex which is the key of marrige system, identity and the relation of exploitation etc. are determined historically. Sprey saw the conflicts within marrige and family as processes that affects spouse or interacts mutually between family members,and Collins is analyzing families being based upon the unequality of the stratification due to sex and age.
On the other hand , the radical feminists argues that the dependency of women to men originated from the biological difference beween men and women, while the socialist feminist argue that it is the result that ideologies interact with materialistic relation of production.
The marxist feminist regard that the oppression on women is entirely banded together with the capitalistic production mode. They are trying to explain why sexual division of labor within family and ideologies make women become discriminated in labor markets, and how women are taken advantage of by capitalists.
Hartmann argues that the partriarchy has materialistic basis. It is stratified, it is a system of social relations between men who are forming interdependence and solidarity in order that they can dominate women,and the patriarchy and the capitalism oppress women, respectively or as combined.
Like this, post-capitalism made families transformed into consuming units and then wage laborer, by which intervention of the state in the families became natural outcome, thus the position as welfare state became.

번역하기