This paper aims to examine the regressivity or progressivity of consumption taxes of Korea based on household consumption survey in 1991 and to compare the result of this paper with that of the past related researches.
The overall consumption tax dis...
This paper aims to examine the regressivity or progressivity of consumption taxes of Korea based on household consumption survey in 1991 and to compare the result of this paper with that of the past related researches.
The overall consumption tax distribution in urban areas turns out astonishingly to be proportional or slightly progressive. This is a quite unexpected result. This is mainly because high income groups tend to increse consumption relatively more than low income groups in late eighties and early nineties and because the former groups tend to underreport their income. These two all contribute to sharp increase in effective tax rates especially of high income groups.
The taxes on petroleum products and automobiles are greatly progressive and lead the overall distribution to progressive. However, taxes on small electric home appliances and taste products reveal regressivity.
The consumption tax distribution in rural areas is shown to be regressive. This result is mainly because household Consumption survey delivered in rural areas focuses only on nondurable goods and excludes consumption data on durable goods such as automobiles, refrigerators, and TVs', Whose contribution to the total consumption tax revenue is very high.