영미 체포,구속제도의 특징과 그 비교법적 함의 = The Characteristics of the Arrest Systems of the United Kingdom and the United States and Their Implications for the Korean Arrest and Detention Systems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The British arrest system is governed by the 1984 Police and Criminal Evidence Act and its Codes of Practice. The American arrest system is ruled by the Amendment IV of the U.S. Constitution and relevant Supreme Court`s decisions. In both systems, a warrant is not strictly required for arrest. The American system also provides pretrial detention for serious felonies although its constitutionality is on hot debate. It also allows prosecutors and suspects to appeal to magistrate`s decision of release or detention. In this context, both systems are more favorable to the law enforcement authority than their Korean counterpart. However, it is necessary to note that the main purpose of arrest in U.K and U.S. is not to investigate suspects but to secure them for trial. Although the British and American law enforcement authorities enjoy wider discretion when arresting suspects than their Korean counterpart, both British and American criminal justice systems provide duty solicitors or public defenders for indigent suspects and far more chance for bail for all suspects including serious criminals. Therefore, we cannot agree with the law enforcement authorities`s attempts to import the Anglo-American arrest system without its institutional surroundings.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정웅석, "형사소송법" 509-, 2008

2 김종구, "형사사법개혁론"

3 김태우, "판사의 영장결정에 대한 불복제도 연구 in:구속제도와 영장항고" 278-279, 2007

4 이재석, "체포제도의 운용과 현실" 한국비교형사법학회 232-, 1999

5 조국, "유죄답변협상 도입의 필요성과 실현 방안 -‘자백감면절차’ 신설을 위한 제언-" 한국법학원 (90) : 224-249, 2006

6 표창원, "영국의 수사제도 in:비교수사제도론"

7 조국, "영국 코먼 로 형사절차의 전면적 혁신과 그 함의―1984년 경찰 및 형사증거법과 1994년 형사사법과 공공질서법을 중심으로" 한국형사정책학회 (10) : 341-351, 1998

8 안성수, "영‧미의 체포‧구속제도에 비추어 본 우리 제도의 문제점과 보완방안 in:구속제도와 영장항고"

9 박창호, "비교수사제도론"

10 이재웅, "미국의 구속제도 in:구속제도와 영장항고"

11 Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, "또한 American Law Institute, A Model Code of Pre- Arraignment Procedure"

12 법무부, "개정형사소송법"

13 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 영장항고 in:구속제도와 영장항고" 316-, 2007

14 "http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/pds/intro.htm"

15 "http://www.dca.gov.uk/consult/saldef/saldefresp.htm"

16 "http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/operational-policing/powers-pace- codes/pace-code-intro/"

17 Joshua Dressler, "Understanding Criminal Procedure 173" 2002

18 Kenneth Oxford, "The Power to Police Effectively, The Police: Powers, Procedures and Proprieties"

19 Michael Zander, "The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984"

20 Pierre Lepaulle, "The Function of Comparative Law with a Critique of Social Jurisprudence" 35 : 838-857, 1922

21 George F. Cole, "The American System of Criminal Justice 222"

22 Davis Ashby, "Safeguarding the Suspect in:The Police: Powers, Procedures, and Proprieties" 1986

23 Alan Watson, "Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law"

24 Wayne R. La Fave, "Criminal Procedure"

25 Department for Constitutional Affairs, "Criminal Defence Service: Establishing a Salaried Defence Service: The Government's Conclusions"

26 Hiram E. Chodosh, "Comparing Comparisons: In Search of Methodology" 84 : 1025-1069, 1999

27 Malcolm M. Feeley, "Comparative Criminal Law for Criminologists: Comparing for What Purposes?" 94 : 1997

28 Neil Corre, "Bail in Criminal Proceedings"

29 American Law Institute, "A Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure" 1975

30 American Law Institute, "A Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure"

31 American Law Institute, "A Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure"

32 American Law Institute, "A Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure"

33 American Law Institute, "A Model Code of Pre- Arraignment Procedure"