RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The Formats of Spatial Representations.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16616225

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022

      • 학위수여대학

        Yale University Psychology

      • 수여연도

        2022

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • 학위

        Ph.D.

      • 페이지수

        141 p.

      • 지도교수/심사위원

        Advisor: Keil, Frank C.;McDougle, Samuel M.

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Mental representations are the essence of cognition. Yet, to understand how the mind works, we must understand not just the content of mental representations (i.e., what information is stored), but also the format of those representations (i.e., how that information is stored). If we want to understand how sensory information is translated into symbolic representations, if we want to know how the mind forms ‘cognitive maps’, if we want to know how the firing of neurons can lead to the emergent phenomenon of human cognition — all of these things require us to understand how information is organized in the mind.In this thesis, I describe three ‘case studies’ of representational format in the domain of spatial cognition. I focus on spatial cognition for several reasons. First, spatial cognition is ubiquitous in the animal kingdom; thus, understanding spatial cognition in the human mind has the potential to reveal insights that generalize to all minds. Second, spatial cognition may be the single domain for which we know the most about the format of representations; indeed, the field was essentially founded on the premise that there exists a discernable ‘cognitive map’ within the mind. As such, it serves as an apt domain to study representational format. Finally, spatial representations (location representations in particular) may serve as the format of other higher-level information (e.g., numerical information, social information, etc.). Understanding the formats of spatial representation, therefore, may shed light on how other kinds of information are represented and organized in the mind.The first case study I describe pertains to the format of location representations. I show that, using a simple ‘error correlation’ analysis, we can uncover from simple spatial tasks the coordinate systems underlying spatial behavior. Using this approach, I argue that locations are spontaneously represented in polar coordinates, but flexibly in other coordinate systems (e.g., Cartesian coordinates) as needed.The second case study I describe pertains to the format of size representations. It has been known for many decades that the perception of size is illusory; for example, larger objects are perceived as being relatively less large. However, these illusions are typically explained by vague, unfalsifiable theories of size perception. I offer a simpler (and falsifiable) explanation of size illusions: that perceived size is equal to the sum of an objects’ dimensions rather than the product. Here, I focus primarily on the perception of area in adults, but this phenomenon appears to be highly general: I briefly allude to similar illusions that children experience, as well as similar illusions of volume.The final case study I describe pertains to how spatial information is used as a format to represent other information. I show that task-irrelevant ‘spatial structure’ spontaneously improves working memory. This effect is specific to spatial information; color information and audio information produce no such benefit. I discuss how these findings relate to existing models of working memory, and help us to understand the relationship between space and memory more broadly. I conclude with some final remarks about how understanding spatial behavior in light of the formats of representations can help us to understand the building blocks of cognition.
      번역하기

      Mental representations are the essence of cognition. Yet, to understand how the mind works, we must understand not just the content of mental representations (i.e., what information is stored), but also the format of those representations (i.e., how ...

      Mental representations are the essence of cognition. Yet, to understand how the mind works, we must understand not just the content of mental representations (i.e., what information is stored), but also the format of those representations (i.e., how that information is stored). If we want to understand how sensory information is translated into symbolic representations, if we want to know how the mind forms ‘cognitive maps’, if we want to know how the firing of neurons can lead to the emergent phenomenon of human cognition — all of these things require us to understand how information is organized in the mind.In this thesis, I describe three ‘case studies’ of representational format in the domain of spatial cognition. I focus on spatial cognition for several reasons. First, spatial cognition is ubiquitous in the animal kingdom; thus, understanding spatial cognition in the human mind has the potential to reveal insights that generalize to all minds. Second, spatial cognition may be the single domain for which we know the most about the format of representations; indeed, the field was essentially founded on the premise that there exists a discernable ‘cognitive map’ within the mind. As such, it serves as an apt domain to study representational format. Finally, spatial representations (location representations in particular) may serve as the format of other higher-level information (e.g., numerical information, social information, etc.). Understanding the formats of spatial representation, therefore, may shed light on how other kinds of information are represented and organized in the mind.The first case study I describe pertains to the format of location representations. I show that, using a simple ‘error correlation’ analysis, we can uncover from simple spatial tasks the coordinate systems underlying spatial behavior. Using this approach, I argue that locations are spontaneously represented in polar coordinates, but flexibly in other coordinate systems (e.g., Cartesian coordinates) as needed.The second case study I describe pertains to the format of size representations. It has been known for many decades that the perception of size is illusory; for example, larger objects are perceived as being relatively less large. However, these illusions are typically explained by vague, unfalsifiable theories of size perception. I offer a simpler (and falsifiable) explanation of size illusions: that perceived size is equal to the sum of an objects’ dimensions rather than the product. Here, I focus primarily on the perception of area in adults, but this phenomenon appears to be highly general: I briefly allude to similar illusions that children experience, as well as similar illusions of volume.The final case study I describe pertains to how spatial information is used as a format to represent other information. I show that task-irrelevant ‘spatial structure’ spontaneously improves working memory. This effect is specific to spatial information; color information and audio information produce no such benefit. I discuss how these findings relate to existing models of working memory, and help us to understand the relationship between space and memory more broadly. I conclude with some final remarks about how understanding spatial behavior in light of the formats of representations can help us to understand the building blocks of cognition.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼