RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    해방 이후 미국 지식인의 한국 인식 ― Far Eastern Quarterly, Far Eastern Survey, Pacific Affairs를 중심으로 ― = American Scholars’ Views of the Korean Issues after the Second World War

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104041333

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the American scholars’ views of the Korean issues from 1945 to 1950’s analyzing the articles appearing in Far Eastern Quarterly, Far Eastern Survey, and Pacific Affairs which published scholarly articles on the Far East.
    Many articles relating to Korean issues were published in 1946 and in 1948. They dealt with the Korean issues such as the Korean situation under the American military Government, American occupation policies in Korea, the first Korean election, land redistribution in Korea, and the future of the new Korean government, etc. The authors of those articles were the experts who researched Korea in American universities and then worked with Korean affairs at the Dept. of State and the American military government in Korea. Arthur C. Bunce and George M. McCune are representative.
    They had friendly eyes toward Korean. They believed Koreans can maintain an independence nation. George M. McCune criticized the American occupation polices in Korea. He blamed the United States for the division of the Korean peninsula. He urged the highest levels of governments in the United States and the Soviet Union review the Korean situation and undertake to correct the faults of previous policy. His view of the Korean government was negative.
    Their articles were based on not only their experiences in Korea but also the elaborate analysis on the historical materials. In this aspect, their analyses on Korean issues can be regarded as making progress.
    번역하기

    This study examines the American scholars’ views of the Korean issues from 1945 to 1950’s analyzing the articles appearing in Far Eastern Quarterly, Far Eastern Survey, and Pacific Affairs which published scholarly articles on the Far East. Many ...

    This study examines the American scholars’ views of the Korean issues from 1945 to 1950’s analyzing the articles appearing in Far Eastern Quarterly, Far Eastern Survey, and Pacific Affairs which published scholarly articles on the Far East.
    Many articles relating to Korean issues were published in 1946 and in 1948. They dealt with the Korean issues such as the Korean situation under the American military Government, American occupation policies in Korea, the first Korean election, land redistribution in Korea, and the future of the new Korean government, etc. The authors of those articles were the experts who researched Korea in American universities and then worked with Korean affairs at the Dept. of State and the American military government in Korea. Arthur C. Bunce and George M. McCune are representative.
    They had friendly eyes toward Korean. They believed Koreans can maintain an independence nation. George M. McCune criticized the American occupation polices in Korea. He blamed the United States for the division of the Korean peninsula. He urged the highest levels of governments in the United States and the Soviet Union review the Korean situation and undertake to correct the faults of previous policy. His view of the Korean government was negative.
    Their articles were based on not only their experiences in Korea but also the elaborate analysis on the historical materials. In this aspect, their analyses on Korean issues can be regarded as making progress.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
    더보기
    해외이동버튼