RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    대규모 개발사업의 인구지표 산정기준 개선방안 : 하남시 미사지구 사례를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107948664

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The study examined the planned population and actual resident population of large-scale development projects, such as Misa newtown according to a shortage of infrastructure such as roads, water supply, sewage and schools, etc. The study suggested guidelines to estimate resident population based on the analysis.
    Specifically, Misa newtown was examined in terms of the planned population, current population, and infrastructure. Also, Pangyo and Byeollae newtowns were analyzed as case studies. The results showed that the planned population was underestimated on detached housing sites, and the actual resident population occurred on non-residential areas such as commercial districts.
    For example, the average household number of detached houses in Pangyo, which allows up to two to three households per a house, is 1.7 households, while 4.1 households in Byeollae and 4.0 households in Misa which allows up to five to seven households. However, actual estimation of resident popupation was a household per a detached house. There are also at least 17,000 units of additional households in Misa newtown as of 2021 including officetels and dormitories in business, commercial, and qusi-industrial areas which did not consider residential dwellings.
    Therefore, the planned population should be calculated in consideration of the number of households allowed per a detached house when developing large-scale areas. Also, the number of allowable households of quasi-housing, such as officetels and dormitories on business, commercial, and qusi-industrial areas should be counted for decent infrastructures to be planned accordingly.
    번역하기

    The study examined the planned population and actual resident population of large-scale development projects, such as Misa newtown according to a shortage of infrastructure such as roads, water supply, sewage and schools, etc. The study suggested guid...

    The study examined the planned population and actual resident population of large-scale development projects, such as Misa newtown according to a shortage of infrastructure such as roads, water supply, sewage and schools, etc. The study suggested guidelines to estimate resident population based on the analysis.
    Specifically, Misa newtown was examined in terms of the planned population, current population, and infrastructure. Also, Pangyo and Byeollae newtowns were analyzed as case studies. The results showed that the planned population was underestimated on detached housing sites, and the actual resident population occurred on non-residential areas such as commercial districts.
    For example, the average household number of detached houses in Pangyo, which allows up to two to three households per a house, is 1.7 households, while 4.1 households in Byeollae and 4.0 households in Misa which allows up to five to seven households. However, actual estimation of resident popupation was a household per a detached house. There are also at least 17,000 units of additional households in Misa newtown as of 2021 including officetels and dormitories in business, commercial, and qusi-industrial areas which did not consider residential dwellings.
    Therefore, the planned population should be calculated in consideration of the number of households allowed per a detached house when developing large-scale areas. Also, the number of allowable households of quasi-housing, such as officetels and dormitories on business, commercial, and qusi-industrial areas should be counted for decent infrastructures to be planned accordingly.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • [표지]
    • [정책건의]
    • [Contents]
    • 표차례
    • 그림차례
    • [표지]
    • [정책건의]
    • [Contents]
    • 표차례
    • 그림차례
    • [제1장 서론]
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
    • 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
    • [제2장 대규모 개발사업의 인구지표 산정기준 제도 현황]
    • 1. 대규모 개발사업 개요
    • 2. 대규모 개발사업의 인구 및 주택 지표 산정기준
    • 3. 소결
    • [제3장 하남미사지구 인구계획 및 현황]
    • 1. 하남미사지구 계획인구 및 거주인구 현황
    • 2. 하남미사지구 기반시설 현황과 문제
    • 3. 소결
    • [제4장 대규모 개발사업지구 사례조사]
    • 1. 사례지구 개요
    • 2. 성남판교
    • 3. 남양주별내
    • 4. 소결
    • [제5장 대규모 개발사업의 인구지표 산정 개선방안]
    • 1. 인구지표 산정 쟁점 및 개선방향
    • 2. 인구지표 산정의 쟁점별 개선방안
    • 3. 제도개선 방안
    • [제6장 결론 및 정책제언]
    • 1. 결론 및 요약
    • 2. 정책제언
    • [참고문헌]
    • [Abstract]
    • [부록]
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼