RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Combined Cataract Extraction and Vitrectomy for Macula-sparing Retinal Detachment: Visual Outcomes and Complications

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103853007

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, andvitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    Methods: The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retrospectively analyzed in patientswith preexisting cataracts and new-onset rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. To qualify, patients must alsohave had macular sparing in a region 6,000 μm in diameter on optical coherence tomography. The anatomicalsuccess rate, visual outcomes, and postoperative complications relating to visual acuity were evaluated.
    Results: In 56 patients followed postoperatively for more than 12 months, the initial and final surgical successrate was 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolutionvisual acuity was 0.05 and decreased to 0.11 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Of the 56 patients, 20 (35.7%) hadworse visual acuity postoperatively, compared with preoperatively (0.06 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001); these cases werecomprised of six patients with epiretinal membranes, 12 patients with a posterior capsule opacity, and twopatients with cystoid macular edema. In the remaining 36 patients, there were no significant differences invisual acuity preoperatively and postoperatively (0.04 vs. 0.03, p = 0.324).
    Conclusions: In patients with cataracts who develop macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachmentand whose visual prognosis is excellent assuming the retina can be reattached successfully, combinedphacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy might be an effective treatment. However,the visual prognosis is significantly affected by postoperative complications such as an epiretinal membranes,posterior capsule opacity, and cystoid macular edema. Therefore, further studies should examine methods toprevent these postoperative complications.
    번역하기

    Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, andvitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retro...

    Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, andvitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    Methods: The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retrospectively analyzed in patientswith preexisting cataracts and new-onset rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. To qualify, patients must alsohave had macular sparing in a region 6,000 μm in diameter on optical coherence tomography. The anatomicalsuccess rate, visual outcomes, and postoperative complications relating to visual acuity were evaluated.
    Results: In 56 patients followed postoperatively for more than 12 months, the initial and final surgical successrate was 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolutionvisual acuity was 0.05 and decreased to 0.11 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Of the 56 patients, 20 (35.7%) hadworse visual acuity postoperatively, compared with preoperatively (0.06 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001); these cases werecomprised of six patients with epiretinal membranes, 12 patients with a posterior capsule opacity, and twopatients with cystoid macular edema. In the remaining 36 patients, there were no significant differences invisual acuity preoperatively and postoperatively (0.04 vs. 0.03, p = 0.324).
    Conclusions: In patients with cataracts who develop macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachmentand whose visual prognosis is excellent assuming the retina can be reattached successfully, combinedphacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy might be an effective treatment. However,the visual prognosis is significantly affected by postoperative complications such as an epiretinal membranes,posterior capsule opacity, and cystoid macular edema. Therefore, further studies should examine methods toprevent these postoperative complications.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    Methods: The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retrospectively analyzed in patients with preexisting cataracts and new-onset rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. To qualify, patients must also have had macular sparing in a region 6,000 μm in diameter on optical coherence tomography. The anatomical success rate, visual outcomes, and postoperative complications relating to visual acuity were evaluated.
    Results: In 56 patients followed postoperatively for more than 12 months, the initial and final surgical success rate was 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity was 0.05 and decreased to 0.11 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Of the 56 patients, 20 (35.7%) had worse visual acuity postoperatively, compared with preoperatively (0.06 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001); these cases were comprised of six patients with epiretinal membranes, 12 patients with a posterior capsule opacity, and two patients with cystoid macular edema. In the remaining 36 patients, there were no significant differences in visual acuity preoperatively and postoperatively (0.04 vs. 0.03, p = 0.324).
    Conclusions: In patients with cataracts who develop macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and whose visual prognosis is excellent assuming the retina can be reattached successfully, combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy might be an effective treatment. However, the visual prognosis is significantly affected by postoperative complications such as an epiretinal membranes, posterior capsule opacity, and cystoid macular edema. Therefore, further studies should examine methods to prevent these postoperative complications.
    번역하기

    Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retr...

    Purpose: To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
    Methods: The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retrospectively analyzed in patients with preexisting cataracts and new-onset rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. To qualify, patients must also have had macular sparing in a region 6,000 μm in diameter on optical coherence tomography. The anatomical success rate, visual outcomes, and postoperative complications relating to visual acuity were evaluated.
    Results: In 56 patients followed postoperatively for more than 12 months, the initial and final surgical success rate was 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity was 0.05 and decreased to 0.11 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Of the 56 patients, 20 (35.7%) had worse visual acuity postoperatively, compared with preoperatively (0.06 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001); these cases were comprised of six patients with epiretinal membranes, 12 patients with a posterior capsule opacity, and two patients with cystoid macular edema. In the remaining 36 patients, there were no significant differences in visual acuity preoperatively and postoperatively (0.04 vs. 0.03, p = 0.324).
    Conclusions: In patients with cataracts who develop macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and whose visual prognosis is excellent assuming the retina can be reattached successfully, combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy might be an effective treatment. However, the visual prognosis is significantly affected by postoperative complications such as an epiretinal membranes, posterior capsule opacity, and cystoid macular edema. Therefore, further studies should examine methods to prevent these postoperative complications.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Machemer R, "Vitrectomy:a pars plana approach" 75 : 813-820, 1971

    2 Salicone A, "Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment" 113 : 1734-1742, 2006

    3 Council MD, "Visual outcomes and complications of epiretinal membrane removal secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment" 112 : 1218-1221, 2005

    4 Schepens CL, "The scleral buckling procedures. I. Surgical techniques and management" 58 : 797-811, 1957

    5 Hassan TS, "The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments" 109 : 146-152, 2002

    6 허문수, "The Clinical Features of Macular Pucker Formation after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair" 대한안과학회 26 (26): 355-361, 2012

    7 Sakimoto S, "Surgical outcomes of epiretinal membrane removal after successful pars plana vitrectomy for retinal diseases" 52 : 227-230, 2008

    8 Heimann H, "Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study" 114 : 2142-2154, 2007

    9 Sjaarda RN., "Retina" Mosby 2301-2312, 1994

    10 McDonald HR, "Retina" Mosby 2531-2546, 2001

    1 Machemer R, "Vitrectomy:a pars plana approach" 75 : 813-820, 1971

    2 Salicone A, "Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment" 113 : 1734-1742, 2006

    3 Council MD, "Visual outcomes and complications of epiretinal membrane removal secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment" 112 : 1218-1221, 2005

    4 Schepens CL, "The scleral buckling procedures. I. Surgical techniques and management" 58 : 797-811, 1957

    5 Hassan TS, "The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments" 109 : 146-152, 2002

    6 허문수, "The Clinical Features of Macular Pucker Formation after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair" 대한안과학회 26 (26): 355-361, 2012

    7 Sakimoto S, "Surgical outcomes of epiretinal membrane removal after successful pars plana vitrectomy for retinal diseases" 52 : 227-230, 2008

    8 Heimann H, "Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study" 114 : 2142-2154, 2007

    9 Sjaarda RN., "Retina" Mosby 2301-2312, 1994

    10 McDonald HR, "Retina" Mosby 2531-2546, 2001

    11 Kaufman PL, "Prognosis of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. 2. Accounting for and predicting final visual acuity in surgically reattached cases" 54 : 61-74, 1976

    12 Tani P, "Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached" 92 : 611-620, 1981

    13 D'Amico DJ, "Principles and practice of ophthalmology" WB Saunders 2402-2421, 2000

    14 Mendrinos E, "Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment" 145 : 1063-1070, 2008

    15 Heimann H, "Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512cases" 244 : 69-78, 2006

    16 Yanyali A, "Primary 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment" 5 : 226-230, 2012

    17 Burton TC, "Preoperative factors influencing anatomic success rates following retinal detachment surgery" 83 : 499-505, 1977

    18 Hsuan JD, "Posterior subcapsular and nuclear cataract after vitrectomy" 27 : 437-444, 2001

    19 Toda J, "Posterior capsule opacification after combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy" 33 : 104-107, 2007

    20 Apple DJ, "Posterior capsule opacification" 37 : 73-116, 1992

    21 Hilton GF, "Pneumatic retinopexy: a two-step outpatient operation without conjunctival incision" 93 : 626-641, 1986

    22 Tornambe PE, "Pneumatic retinopexy: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. The Retinal Detachment Study Group" 96 : 772-783, 1989

    23 Treumer F, "Pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation:comparison of clinical complications in a combined versus two-step surgical approach" 244 : 808-815, 2006

    24 Melberg NS, "Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy in patients younger than 50 years of age" 102 : 1466-1471, 1995

    25 De Bustros S, "Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes" 105 : 160-164, 1988

    26 Norton EW, "Intraocular gas in the management of selected retinal detachments" 77 : 85-98, 1973

    27 Barrie T, "Debate overview: repair of a primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment" 87 : 790-, 2003

    28 Lahey JM, "Combining phacoemulsification with vitrectomy for treatment of macular holes" 86 : 876-878, 2002

    29 Lahey JM, "Combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a series of 223 cases" 110 : 1335-1339, 2003

    30 D’Amico DJ, "Clinical practice: primary retinal detachment" 359 : 2346-2354, 2008

    31 Wensheng L, "Clinical complications of combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal diseases" 19 : 37-45, 2009

    32 Kiss CG, "Anatomy and function of the macula after surgery for retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy" 144 : 872-877, 2007

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.11 0.11 0.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.1 0.13 0.482 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼