RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of AI Education Policy Frameworks in South Korea, Japan, and China: A Review

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110125117

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: The current study examines how national artificial intelligence (AI) education policy frameworks are designed and implemented in South Korea, Japan, and China. As AI becomes a strategic driver of economic competitiveness, education systems increasingly serve as policy instruments for long-term workforce and innovation development. Research design, data and methodology: Adopting a structured literature review approach for investigating in the literature dataset, this study synthesizes academic research, policy analyses, and comparative education studies related to AI education strategies in the three countries. The review focuses on policy objectives, governance structures, curriculum orientation, and implementation mechanisms. Results: The comprehensive review procedure has identified distinct national patterns. South Korea emphasizes system-wide digital competence and curriculum integration, Japan prioritizes ethical AI literacy and human-centered design, and China adopts a state-led, large-scale approach linking AI education directly to industrial and national development goals. Despite shared recognition of AI's importance, policy execution reflects differing institutional logics. Conclusions: All in all, the findings of the current research have suggested that AI education policies are shaped less by technological convergence than by national governance traditions and economic priorities. Understanding these differences provides insight into how education policy functions as a strategic tool in the AI era.
      번역하기

      Purpose: The current study examines how national artificial intelligence (AI) education policy frameworks are designed and implemented in South Korea, Japan, and China. As AI becomes a strategic driver of economic competitiveness, education systems in...

      Purpose: The current study examines how national artificial intelligence (AI) education policy frameworks are designed and implemented in South Korea, Japan, and China. As AI becomes a strategic driver of economic competitiveness, education systems increasingly serve as policy instruments for long-term workforce and innovation development. Research design, data and methodology: Adopting a structured literature review approach for investigating in the literature dataset, this study synthesizes academic research, policy analyses, and comparative education studies related to AI education strategies in the three countries. The review focuses on policy objectives, governance structures, curriculum orientation, and implementation mechanisms. Results: The comprehensive review procedure has identified distinct national patterns. South Korea emphasizes system-wide digital competence and curriculum integration, Japan prioritizes ethical AI literacy and human-centered design, and China adopts a state-led, large-scale approach linking AI education directly to industrial and national development goals. Despite shared recognition of AI's importance, policy execution reflects differing institutional logics. Conclusions: All in all, the findings of the current research have suggested that AI education policies are shaped less by technological convergence than by national governance traditions and economic priorities. Understanding these differences provides insight into how education policy functions as a strategic tool in the AI era.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼