RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신규시장 성장모형의 모수 추정을 위한 전문가 시스템

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101739426

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Demand forecasting is the activity of estimating the quantity of a product or service that consumers will purchase for a certain period of time. Developing precise forecasting models are considered important since corporates can make strategic decisions on new markets based on future demand estimated by the models. Many studies have developed market growth curve models, such as Bass, Logistic, Gompertz models, which estimate future demand when a market is in its early stage. Among the models, Bass model, which explains the demand from two types of adopters, innovators and imitators, has been widely used in forecasting.
    Such models require sufficient demand observations to ensure qualified results. In the beginning of a new market, however, observations are not sufficient for the models to precisely estimate the market’s future demand. For this reason, as an alternative, demands guessed from those of most adjacent markets are often used as references in such cases. Reference markets can be those whose products are developed with the same categorical technologies. A market’s demand may be expected to have the similar pattern with that of a reference market in case the adoption pattern of a product in the market is determined mainly by the technology related to the product.
    However, such processes may not always ensure pleasing results because the similarity between markets depends on intuition and/or experience. There are two major drawbacks that human experts cannot effectively handle in this approach. One is the abundance of candidate reference markets to consider, and the other is the difficulty in calculating the similarity between markets. First, there can be too many markets to consider in selecting reference markets. Mostly, markets in the same category in an industrial hierarchy can be reference markets because they are usually based on the similar technologies. However, markets can be classified into different categories even if they are based on the same generic technologies. Therefore, markets in other categories also need to be considered as potential candidates. Next, even domain experts cannot consistently calculate the similarity between markets with their own qualitative standards. The inconsistency implies missing adjacent reference markets, which may lead to the imprecise estimation of future demand. Even though there are no missing reference markets, the new market’s parameters can be hardly estimated from the reference markets without quantitative standards.
    For this reason, this study proposes a case-based expert system that helps experts overcome the drawbacks in discovering referential markets. First, this study proposes the use of Euclidean distance measure to calculate the similarity between markets. Based on their similarities, markets are grouped into clusters. Then, missing markets with the characteristics of the cluster are searched for. Potential candidate reference markets are extracted and recommended to users. After the iteration of these steps, definite reference markets are determined according to the user’s selection among those candidates. Then, finally, the new market’s parameters are estimated from the reference markets. For this procedure, two techniques are used in the model. One is clustering data mining technique, and the other content-based filtering of recommender systems. The proposed system implemented with those techniques can determine the most adjacent markets based on whether a user accepts candidate markets.
    Experiments were conducted to validate the usefulness of the system with five ICT experts involved. In the experiments, the experts were given the list of 16 ICT markets whose parameters to be estimated. For each of the markets, the experts estimated its parameters of growth curve models with intuition at first, and then with the system. The comparison of the experiments results show that the estimated parameters are closer when they use the system in co
    번역하기

    Demand forecasting is the activity of estimating the quantity of a product or service that consumers will purchase for a certain period of time. Developing precise forecasting models are considered important since corporates can make strategic decisio...

    Demand forecasting is the activity of estimating the quantity of a product or service that consumers will purchase for a certain period of time. Developing precise forecasting models are considered important since corporates can make strategic decisions on new markets based on future demand estimated by the models. Many studies have developed market growth curve models, such as Bass, Logistic, Gompertz models, which estimate future demand when a market is in its early stage. Among the models, Bass model, which explains the demand from two types of adopters, innovators and imitators, has been widely used in forecasting.
    Such models require sufficient demand observations to ensure qualified results. In the beginning of a new market, however, observations are not sufficient for the models to precisely estimate the market’s future demand. For this reason, as an alternative, demands guessed from those of most adjacent markets are often used as references in such cases. Reference markets can be those whose products are developed with the same categorical technologies. A market’s demand may be expected to have the similar pattern with that of a reference market in case the adoption pattern of a product in the market is determined mainly by the technology related to the product.
    However, such processes may not always ensure pleasing results because the similarity between markets depends on intuition and/or experience. There are two major drawbacks that human experts cannot effectively handle in this approach. One is the abundance of candidate reference markets to consider, and the other is the difficulty in calculating the similarity between markets. First, there can be too many markets to consider in selecting reference markets. Mostly, markets in the same category in an industrial hierarchy can be reference markets because they are usually based on the similar technologies. However, markets can be classified into different categories even if they are based on the same generic technologies. Therefore, markets in other categories also need to be considered as potential candidates. Next, even domain experts cannot consistently calculate the similarity between markets with their own qualitative standards. The inconsistency implies missing adjacent reference markets, which may lead to the imprecise estimation of future demand. Even though there are no missing reference markets, the new market’s parameters can be hardly estimated from the reference markets without quantitative standards.
    For this reason, this study proposes a case-based expert system that helps experts overcome the drawbacks in discovering referential markets. First, this study proposes the use of Euclidean distance measure to calculate the similarity between markets. Based on their similarities, markets are grouped into clusters. Then, missing markets with the characteristics of the cluster are searched for. Potential candidate reference markets are extracted and recommended to users. After the iteration of these steps, definite reference markets are determined according to the user’s selection among those candidates. Then, finally, the new market’s parameters are estimated from the reference markets. For this procedure, two techniques are used in the model. One is clustering data mining technique, and the other content-based filtering of recommender systems. The proposed system implemented with those techniques can determine the most adjacent markets based on whether a user accepts candidate markets.
    Experiments were conducted to validate the usefulness of the system with five ICT experts involved. In the experiments, the experts were given the list of 16 ICT markets whose parameters to be estimated. For each of the markets, the experts estimated its parameters of growth curve models with intuition at first, and then with the system. The comparison of the experiments results show that the estimated parameters are closer when they use the system in co

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김진화, "지식 누적을 이용한 실시간 주식시장 예측" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 109-130, 2011

    2 송경빈, "산업체의 조업률을 반영한 연휴의 단기 전력수요예측" 대한전기학회 62 (62): 1657-1660, 2013

    3 황유섭, "사례기반 추론기법과 인공신경망을 이용한 서비스 수요예측 프레임워크" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 43-57, 2012

    4 임종훈, "단기 전력수요예측 정확도 개선을 위한 대표기온 산정방안" 한국조명.전기설비학회 27 (27): 39-43, 2013

    5 남봉우, "다중회귀분석법을 이용한 지역전력수요예측 알고리즘" 한국조명.전기설비학회 22 (22): 63-70, 2008

    6 김성태, "관광수요예측에 대한 실증연구: 패널 데이터 분석기법을 중심으로" (사)한국관광레저학회 26 (26): 115-129, 2014

    7 Srinivasan, V., "Technical note-nonlinear least squares estimation of new product diffusion models" 5 (5): 169-178, 1986

    8 Mansfield, E, "Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation" 741-766, 1961

    9 Woodstock, L. W., "Relationships between growth rates and nucleic acid contents in the roots of inbred lines of corn" 47 (47): 713-716, 1960

    10 Resnick, P., "Recommender systems" 40 (40): 56-58, 1997

    1 김진화, "지식 누적을 이용한 실시간 주식시장 예측" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 109-130, 2011

    2 송경빈, "산업체의 조업률을 반영한 연휴의 단기 전력수요예측" 대한전기학회 62 (62): 1657-1660, 2013

    3 황유섭, "사례기반 추론기법과 인공신경망을 이용한 서비스 수요예측 프레임워크" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 43-57, 2012

    4 임종훈, "단기 전력수요예측 정확도 개선을 위한 대표기온 산정방안" 한국조명.전기설비학회 27 (27): 39-43, 2013

    5 남봉우, "다중회귀분석법을 이용한 지역전력수요예측 알고리즘" 한국조명.전기설비학회 22 (22): 63-70, 2008

    6 김성태, "관광수요예측에 대한 실증연구: 패널 데이터 분석기법을 중심으로" (사)한국관광레저학회 26 (26): 115-129, 2014

    7 Srinivasan, V., "Technical note-nonlinear least squares estimation of new product diffusion models" 5 (5): 169-178, 1986

    8 Mansfield, E, "Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation" 741-766, 1961

    9 Woodstock, L. W., "Relationships between growth rates and nucleic acid contents in the roots of inbred lines of corn" 47 (47): 713-716, 1960

    10 Resnick, P., "Recommender systems" 40 (40): 56-58, 1997

    11 Heeler, R. M, "Problems in predicting new product growth for consumer durables" 26 (26): 1007-1020, 1980

    12 Balabanović, M., "Fab: content- based, collaborative recommendation" 40 (40): 66-72, 1997

    13 Fourt, L. A, "Early Prediction of Market Success of New Grocery Products" 25 (25): 31-38, 1960

    14 Lee, G., "Comparison Study of Demand Forecasting Techniques using Growth Curve Models" 13 (13): 195-228, 2002

    15 Hartigan, J. A, "Clustering algorithms" John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1975

    16 Van den Bulte, C., "Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macro-level diffusion models" 16 (16): 338-353, 1997

    17 Ahn, C., "An Analysis of the Cross Relation between The New Telecommunications Services and Demand Forecast based on Use Pattern of Consumers" 585-592, 2007

    18 Jain, A. K, "Algorithms for clustering data" Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1988

    19 Montaner, M, "A taxonomy of recommender agents on the internet" 19 (19): 285-330, 2003

    20 Noh, K., "A study on hybrid demand forecasting for mobile phone" 1222-1228, 2011

    21 Bass, F. M., "A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables" 15 (15): 215-227, 1969

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
    2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼