RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    推計課稅의 特質과 立法的 發展方向 = Distinctive Features and Legislative Method of Estimated Taxation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76453574

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Estimated taxation is a concept that is comparatively different from real amount taxation where taxation is calculated by basing on the actual investigation. The fundamental difference between real amount taxation and estimated taxation under the present tax system is that the real amount taxation like the commonly practiced theory, bases actual evidences such as account books and bills for calculating tax, while the estimated taxation bases indirect evidences or facts for calculating tax. Furthermore, the estimated taxation has distinguishing features differentiated from the real amount taxation.<BR>  That is, in the case of the real amount taxation, every individual income statement is clear, while in the case of the estimated taxation, individual income statement is unclear and requirement for taxation may be unclear. In addition, the premises for estimated taxation is requirement for taking estimations and it requires generalized rationality and specific validation on individual tax payer for deriving a taxation method.<BR>  The study seeks to correct reality of estimation being treated as the same type of taxation, as the real amount taxation, due to undetermined and unprepared regulations and procedures on estimated taxation, despite of such differences are being recognized by taxpayers as clearly distinguished tax method. Therefore, the study seeks to suggest legislative methods and investigate legislative solutions on the estimated taxation by amending related articles of laws that could specifically complement the deficient requirements of estimated taxation.
    번역하기

      Estimated taxation is a concept that is comparatively different from real amount taxation where taxation is calculated by basing on the actual investigation. The fundamental difference between real amount taxation and estimated taxation un...

      Estimated taxation is a concept that is comparatively different from real amount taxation where taxation is calculated by basing on the actual investigation. The fundamental difference between real amount taxation and estimated taxation under the present tax system is that the real amount taxation like the commonly practiced theory, bases actual evidences such as account books and bills for calculating tax, while the estimated taxation bases indirect evidences or facts for calculating tax. Furthermore, the estimated taxation has distinguishing features differentiated from the real amount taxation.<BR>  That is, in the case of the real amount taxation, every individual income statement is clear, while in the case of the estimated taxation, individual income statement is unclear and requirement for taxation may be unclear. In addition, the premises for estimated taxation is requirement for taking estimations and it requires generalized rationality and specific validation on individual tax payer for deriving a taxation method.<BR>  The study seeks to correct reality of estimation being treated as the same type of taxation, as the real amount taxation, due to undetermined and unprepared regulations and procedures on estimated taxation, despite of such differences are being recognized by taxpayers as clearly distinguished tax method. Therefore, the study seeks to suggest legislative methods and investigate legislative solutions on the estimated taxation by amending related articles of laws that could specifically complement the deficient requirements of estimated taxation.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 시작하는 말
      Ⅱ. 추계과세의 본질과 주요사실
      Ⅲ. 추계과세의 전제요건(필요사유)
      Ⅳ. 추계과세의 합리성
      Ⅴ. 추계과세제도의 입법적 발전 방향
      Ⅵ. 맺는 말
    • Ⅰ. 시작하는 말
      Ⅱ. 추계과세의 본질과 주요사실
      Ⅲ. 추계과세의 전제요건(필요사유)
      Ⅳ. 추계과세의 합리성
      Ⅴ. 추계과세제도의 입법적 발전 방향
      Ⅵ. 맺는 말
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2014-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-02-15 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.67 0.67 0.55
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.49 0.682 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼