성과 성역할 정체감 및 성격특성이 의사소통 어려움 지각에 미치는 영향 = The effects of gender, gender role identity, and personality characteristics on the perceived communication difficulty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study examined the effects of gender, gender role identity and two personality characteristics on the perceived communication difficulty with male and female college students. Statistical analysis revealed in the same-sex communication female perceived more communication difficulty than male, but in the opposite-sex communication no gender effect was found. Gender role identity had significant effects on the same- and opposite-sex communication. That is, the person with the androgynous and masculine gender role identity perceived the lower level of communication difficulty than feminine and undifferentiated the one in the same- and opposite-sex communication. Also the person with the low level of neuroticism and high level of extraversion has low level of perceived communication difficulty. And regression analysis revealed extraversion has the greatest effect, which is followed by neuroticism, but the masculinity and femininity has no effects on the perceived communication difficulty in male and female.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 남녀 대학생(405명)을 대상으로 개인의 성과 성역할 정체감 및 성격특성(정서적 불안정성과 외향성)이 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통 어려움 지각에 어떤 영향을 주는지를 검증하였다. 연구대상자들에게 성역할 정체감 척도와 의사소통 어려움 지각 척도, 정서적 불안정성 척도 및 외향성 척도를 실시하여 연구한 결과, 여성들이 남성들보다 동성과의 의사소통을 더 어렵다고 지각하였으나 이성과의 의사소통 지각에서는 성차가 나타나지 않았다. 그러나 성역할 정체감은 동성과는 물론 이성과의 의사소통 어려움 지각에도 유의한 영향을 주어, 양성적 및 남성적 성역할 정체감을 지니고 있는 사람들이 여성적 혹은 미분화의 성역할 정체감 소유자들보다 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통 어려움을 더 적게 지각하였다. 또한 정서적 불안정성이 높은 사람들이 낮은 사람들보다 그리고 외향성이 낮은 사람들이 높은 사람들보다 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통을 더 어렵다고 지각하였다. 성역할 정체감과 성격특성이 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통 어려움 지각에 미치는 상대적 영향을 비교한 결과, 남녀 구분없이 외향성이 가장 큰 영향을 미치고 그 다음이 정서적 불안정성이었으며, 남성성과 여성성은 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정진경, "한국 성역할 검사" 5 (5): 82-92, 1990

2 노동부, "직업선호도검사 실시요람"

3 장휘숙, "개인의 성과 성역할 정체감이 대화의 중단과 대화량에 미치는 영향" 17 (17): 107-120, 2004

4 Edwards, R, "You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen's model of gender and communication" 50 (50): 491-504, 2004

5 Tannen, D., "You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation" New York: Morrow 1990

6 West, C, "Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interactions" 24 : 521-528, 1977

7 Basow, S, "Troubles talk: Effects of gender and gender-typing" 48 (48): 183-187, 2003

8 Gilbert, L. A., "Toward mental health: The benefits of psychological androgyny" 12 (12): 29-38, 1981

9 Tannen, D., "The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance ; Gender and conversational interaction" New York: Oxford University Press 165-180, 1993

10 Bem, S. L, "The measurement of psych- ological androgyny" 42 : 155-162, 1974

11 Burke, P. J, "The link between identity and role performance." 44 : 83-92, 1981

12 Edwards, R, "The effects of loneliness and verbal aggressiveness on message interpretation" 66 : 139-150, 2001

13 Edwards, R, "The effects of gender, gender role, and values on the interpretation of messages" 17 (17): 52-71, 1998

14 McCroskey, J. C, "The effect of systematic desensitization on speech anxiety" 19 : 32-36, 1970

15 Drass, K. A, "The effect of gender identity on conversation" 49 (49): 294-301, 1986

16 Stryker, S, "Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version" Menlo Park: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co.

17 Broverman, I. K, "Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal" 28 : 59-78, 1972

18 Zimmerman, D. H, "Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation; Language and sex: Difference and dominance" Rowley, MA: Newbury House 1975

19 Eagly, A. H, "Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation" Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1987

20 Knapp, M. L, "Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms" 47 : 262-278, 1980

21 Thorne, B, "Language and Sex: Difference and dominance" Rowley, MA: Newbury House 1975

22 Edwards, R, "Interpreting relational meanings: The influence of sex and gender- role. Vol. 17(1)" Communication Research Reports 13-21, 2000

23 McCall, G. J, "Identities and interactions" New York: The Free Press 1966

24 Keaten, J, "Development of an instrument to measure reticence" Miami Beach, FL, USA. 1993

25 MacLeod, C, "Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study" 102 : 238-247, 1993

26 Spence, J. T, "Achievement-related motives and behaviors ; Achievement and achievement motives" San Francisco: Freeman 1983

27 Maltz, D. N, "A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication; Language and social identity" Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 196-216, 1982