불완전 인용정보 하에서의 특허의 기술적 중요도 평가 모형

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although domestic research funding organizations require patented technologies as an outcome of financial aids, they have much difficulty in evaluating qualitative value of the patented technology due to lack of systematic methods. Especially, because citation data is not essential to patent application in Korea, it is very difficult to evaluate a patent using the incomplete citation data. This study proposes a method for evaluating technology importance of a patent when there is no or insufficient citation data in patents. The technology importance of a patent can be evaluated objectively and quantitatively by the proposed method which consists of 5 steps such as selection of a target patent, collection of related patents, preparation of key word vector, clustering patents, and technological importance assessment. The method was applied to a patent on ‘user identification method for payment using mobile terminal’ in order to evaluate technology importance and demonstrate how the method works.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이장희, "성공적인 e-Business를 위한 인공지능 기법 기반 웹 마이닝" 한국지능정보시스템학회 8 (8): 159-175, 2002

2 김경재, "데이터 마이닝을 이용한 인터넷 쇼핑몰 상품추천시스템" 한국지능정보시스템학회 11 (11): 191-205, 2005

3 OECD, "“The measurement of scientific and technological activities：Using as science and technology indicators-Patent manual”, Paris, 1994"

4 Hirschey, M., "Valuation effects of patent quality：A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms" 9 (9): 65-82, 2001

5 Mcmillan, G.S., "Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge：An Anlysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry" 12 (12): 465-475, 2000

6 Schmoch, U., "Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators" 26 (26): 193-211, 1993

7 Putnam, J., "The value of international patent rights" Yale University 1996

8 Mowery, D.C., "Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation：implications for the resource-based view of the firm" 27 (27): 507-523, 1998

9 Van der Drift, J., "Statistics of European patents on legal status and granting data" 10 (10): 243-249, 1988

10 Scotchmer, S., "Standing on the shoulders pf giants：cumulative research and the patent law" 5 (5): 193-211, 1991

11 Scotchmer, S., "Protecting early innovators：should second-generation products be patentable?" 22 (22): 322-331, 1996

12 Lanjouw, J.O., "Patent protection in the shadow of infringement：simulation estimations of patent value" 65 (65): 671-710, 1998

13 Narin, F., "Patent bibliometrics" 30 (30): 147-156, 1994

14 Karki, M.M.S., "Patent Citation Analysis：A Policy Analysis Tool" 19 (19): 269-272, 1997

15 Wartburg, I. V., "Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis" 34 : 1591-1607, 2005

16 Kutznets, S., "Innovation Activity：Problems of definition and measurement, In R. Nelson (ed.)" Princeton University Press 1962

17 Swann, P., "Inference from mixed bags：The economic value of patent counts, Innovation counts and the lake" London Business School 1993

18 Tijssen. R.J.W., "Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science：Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows" 30 (30): 35-54, 2001

19 Larsen, B., "Fast and Effective Text Mining Using Linear-Time Document Clustering" in Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on KDD 1999

20 Meyer, M., "Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature" 29 (29): 409-434, 2000

21 Albert, M.B., "Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents" 20 (20): 251-259, 1991

22 Harhoff, D., "Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights" 32 (32): 1343-1363, 2003

23 Harhoff, D., "Citation frequency and the value of patented innovation" 81 (81): 511-515, 1999

24 Yoon, B., "A text-mining based patent network：Analytical tool for high- technology trend" 15 (15): 37-50, 2004

25 Trajtenberg, M., "A penny for your quotes：patent citations and the value of inventions" 21 (21): 172-187, 1990