RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구 = Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in Korean Classroom

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article presents a study of corrective feedback and learner uptake in two intermediate level Korean language classrooms. After presenting and outlining the corrective feedback types used by Korean teachers, it analyses student uptake in response to the different types of feedback. Lastly it investigates the relationships between feedback type and learner uptake. The two most popular feedback techniques used by Korean teachers are ‘explicit (grammatical) correction' (49%)' and ‘recasting' (22%). These two techniques are shown to rarely result in learner uptake (30%, 89% respectively), and they are least likely to give students the opportunity to ‘self-repair' with student repetition or to notice the teacher's utterance. More implicit feedback types such as ‘clarification request', ‘elicitation' or ‘repetition' are the most likely to lead to uptake thanks to learner's self-repair in most cases (See <table 6>). In particular, elicitation is proven to be the most successful technique for bringing about learner self-repair. This implies that teachers need to increase opportunities for learners to use their own resources to actively revise of their individual hypotheses about the Korean language.
    번역하기

    This article presents a study of corrective feedback and learner uptake in two intermediate level Korean language classrooms. After presenting and outlining the corrective feedback types used by Korean teachers, it analyses student uptake in response ...

    This article presents a study of corrective feedback and learner uptake in two intermediate level Korean language classrooms. After presenting and outlining the corrective feedback types used by Korean teachers, it analyses student uptake in response to the different types of feedback. Lastly it investigates the relationships between feedback type and learner uptake. The two most popular feedback techniques used by Korean teachers are ‘explicit (grammatical) correction' (49%)' and ‘recasting' (22%). These two techniques are shown to rarely result in learner uptake (30%, 89% respectively), and they are least likely to give students the opportunity to ‘self-repair' with student repetition or to notice the teacher's utterance. More implicit feedback types such as ‘clarification request', ‘elicitation' or ‘repetition' are the most likely to lead to uptake thanks to learner's self-repair in most cases (See <table 6>). In particular, elicitation is proven to be the most successful technique for bringing about learner self-repair. This implies that teachers need to increase opportunities for learners to use their own resources to actively revise of their individual hypotheses about the Korean language.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국어 교실에서 나타난 교사의 피드백 유형 연구" 연세대학교 언어연구 교육원 한국어학당 25,26 : 453-505, 2001

    2 "한국어 교실 구두 상호작용에 나타난 문제 해결을 위한 의미 협상 - 교사 - 학습자 대화를 중심으로 -" 신촌 2004

    3 "and negative evidence in language acquisition Studies in Second Language Acquisition" 283-302, 1994

    4 "The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition,Handbook of second language acquisition" New York: Academic Press 413-468, 1996

    5 "The role of consciousness in second language learning" 128-158, 1990

    6 "The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in context" 361-382, 1977

    7 "The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching" 89-110, 1980

    8 "Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning" Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1988

    9 "Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese" Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

    10 "How languages are learned" Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 1999

    1 "한국어 교실에서 나타난 교사의 피드백 유형 연구" 연세대학교 언어연구 교육원 한국어학당 25,26 : 453-505, 2001

    2 "한국어 교실 구두 상호작용에 나타난 문제 해결을 위한 의미 협상 - 교사 - 학습자 대화를 중심으로 -" 신촌 2004

    3 "and negative evidence in language acquisition Studies in Second Language Acquisition" 283-302, 1994

    4 "The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition,Handbook of second language acquisition" New York: Academic Press 413-468, 1996

    5 "The role of consciousness in second language learning" 128-158, 1990

    6 "The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in context" 361-382, 1977

    7 "The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching" 89-110, 1980

    8 "Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning" Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1988

    9 "Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese" Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

    10 "How languages are learned" Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 1999

    11 "Forms and functions of teachers‘ questions Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition" 268-286, 1983

    12 "Focus on the language classroom" Cambridge University Press 2000

    13 "Corrective feedback in historical perspective" 89-102, 1991

    14 "Corrective feedback and learner uptake" 19 (19): 37-66, 1997

    15 "Annual Review of Applied Linguistics" 92-106, 1988

    16 "An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations Studies in Second Language Acquisition" 357-386, 1993

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.01 1.01 1.05
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.05 1 1.563 0.13
    더보기
    해외이동버튼