RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    冲突与融合 —早期现代化在景德镇陶瓷业中的阵痛— = The Present and Past of Jingdezhen Ceramic Industry

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104048761

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this article, the writer would like to, through a case study on Jingdezhen ceramic industry during its early modernization, which means its transformation from handicraft workshop to company, from tradition to modern, let the readers get to know the various differences and distance between the production mode and cultural concept of traditional Chinese handicraft industry and modern industry, for it’s such differences and distance that create the various problems and obstructions for the early modernization in China. Such case is more particular in Jingdezhen, an inland mountainous city of ceramic handicraft, where trade associations, patriarchal clans, and traditional customs closely connected with surrounding countryside villages have firm controls on the production mode and living style of many handicraftsmen. Therefore, there are more problems for transformation in the place.In the period of the Republic of China, some intellectual elites, with their enthusiasm to save the nation by engaging in industry, adopted a series of improving measures and cultivated some technical talents. But, their works were not sufficient enough. Since 1949, with its thousands-year traditional production mode ended, Jingdezhen ceramic handicraft has followed away of western industrialization. However, following the deepening development of market-oriented economy in China in 1990s, many state-owned ceramic factories broke up. Thus, the ceramic industry in Jingdezhen resumed to its traditional production mode of handicraft industry. Hundreds of small ceramic handicraft workshops emerged in Jingdezhen Republic of China and in the time after the founding of new china, as well as the various ceramic industrial culture has drawn more attention and got more protection, for starting from 2000, Chinese government has been paying more and more attention to the safe guarding of intangible cultural heritages. Today, with the proposal of the idea of cultural diversity, many intellectuals query the necessity for all nations or all regions to follow the way of western large-scale industrialization, and thus to deny the traditional culture and production mode of non-western countries. The writer of this article thinks that, the past and present situation of Jingdezhen ceramic industry may provide some exploratory possibilities to tackle the queries.
    번역하기

    In this article, the writer would like to, through a case study on Jingdezhen ceramic industry during its early modernization, which means its transformation from handicraft workshop to company, from tradition to modern, let the readers get to know th...

    In this article, the writer would like to, through a case study on Jingdezhen ceramic industry during its early modernization, which means its transformation from handicraft workshop to company, from tradition to modern, let the readers get to know the various differences and distance between the production mode and cultural concept of traditional Chinese handicraft industry and modern industry, for it’s such differences and distance that create the various problems and obstructions for the early modernization in China. Such case is more particular in Jingdezhen, an inland mountainous city of ceramic handicraft, where trade associations, patriarchal clans, and traditional customs closely connected with surrounding countryside villages have firm controls on the production mode and living style of many handicraftsmen. Therefore, there are more problems for transformation in the place.In the period of the Republic of China, some intellectual elites, with their enthusiasm to save the nation by engaging in industry, adopted a series of improving measures and cultivated some technical talents. But, their works were not sufficient enough. Since 1949, with its thousands-year traditional production mode ended, Jingdezhen ceramic handicraft has followed away of western industrialization. However, following the deepening development of market-oriented economy in China in 1990s, many state-owned ceramic factories broke up. Thus, the ceramic industry in Jingdezhen resumed to its traditional production mode of handicraft industry. Hundreds of small ceramic handicraft workshops emerged in Jingdezhen Republic of China and in the time after the founding of new china, as well as the various ceramic industrial culture has drawn more attention and got more protection, for starting from 2000, Chinese government has been paying more and more attention to the safe guarding of intangible cultural heritages. Today, with the proposal of the idea of cultural diversity, many intellectuals query the necessity for all nations or all regions to follow the way of western large-scale industrialization, and thus to deny the traditional culture and production mode of non-western countries. The writer of this article thinks that, the past and present situation of Jingdezhen ceramic industry may provide some exploratory possibilities to tackle the queries.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 塞???亨廷, "革社?中的政治次序" 夏出版社 1988

    2 "醒, 「?中?今日之?情外?」, 『申?』, 1909年"

    3 周??著, "景德?史" 上海人民出版社 1989

    4 "明?佛山碑刻文????料" 人民出版社 1987

    5 虞和平, "商??中?早期?代化" 上海人民出版社 1993

    6 汪宗, "代景德?陶瓷??史" 中??籍出版社 1994

    7 君等主, "中西500年比" 工人出版社 1996

    8 彭?益, "中?近代手工?史?料" 中??局 1962

    9 "『都昌?志』"

    10 "『浮梁?志』(道光)"

    1 塞???亨廷, "革社?中的政治次序" 夏出版社 1988

    2 "醒, 「?中?今日之?情外?」, 『申?』, 1909年"

    3 周??著, "景德?史" 上海人民出版社 1989

    4 "明?佛山碑刻文????料" 人民出版社 1987

    5 虞和平, "商??中?早期?代化" 上海人民出版社 1993

    6 汪宗, "代景德?陶瓷??史" 中??籍出版社 1994

    7 君等主, "中西500年比" 工人出版社 1996

    8 彭?益, "中?近代手工?史?料" 中??局 1962

    9 "『都昌?志』"

    10 "『浮梁?志』(道光)"

    11 "『江西省大志』(嘉靖)"

    12 "『景德?文史?料』"

    13 "『景德?文史?料』"

    14 "『?恩?集』 中文版"

    15 "『?克思恩格斯全集』"

    16 "(美)阿???托夫勤, 『第三次浪潮』, 生活·??·新知三??店, 1984年"

    17 "(日本)富永健一, 「“?代化理?”今日之??」, ?于(美)塞??·享廷? 著, 『?代化理???史??的再探?』, 上海?文出版社, 1993年"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.48 0.47 0.972 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼