RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      外交와 Prudence = Prudence and Diplomacy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2083980

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      As the logic of practical politics has rarely been the subject of study in general political so has the logic of practical diplomatic practices received scarce attention in philosophico-theoretical studies of international relations.
      with the advent of scientific study of politics, the long tradition of interest in prudence, which since Aristotle: through Machiavelli down to some philosophers of early 18th century continued to draw prime theoretical interest as to practical philosophy of politics, Las largely been left in oblivion.
      A paradox ensuing from this situation is that the more one acquires scientific knowledge of politics the less perceptive he becomes of the complexity of political reality.
      Prudence cannot find its place in either strict teleology or wholesome rationalism. Only when practical politics is grasped in terms of a dilemmatical human drama can the concept of prudence be comprehended with relative ease.
      International relations seen from the realistic stand-point is perhaps the most dilemmatical realm of human life. The guide to tactical diplomacy is therefore more demanding than in any other realms of human existence.
      Accordingly, an attempt is made here to restore the idea of prudence with emphasis on its philosophical dimensions and with special reference to international relations.
      번역하기

      As the logic of practical politics has rarely been the subject of study in general political so has the logic of practical diplomatic practices received scarce attention in philosophico-theoretical studies of international relations. with the adven...

      As the logic of practical politics has rarely been the subject of study in general political so has the logic of practical diplomatic practices received scarce attention in philosophico-theoretical studies of international relations.
      with the advent of scientific study of politics, the long tradition of interest in prudence, which since Aristotle: through Machiavelli down to some philosophers of early 18th century continued to draw prime theoretical interest as to practical philosophy of politics, Las largely been left in oblivion.
      A paradox ensuing from this situation is that the more one acquires scientific knowledge of politics the less perceptive he becomes of the complexity of political reality.
      Prudence cannot find its place in either strict teleology or wholesome rationalism. Only when practical politics is grasped in terms of a dilemmatical human drama can the concept of prudence be comprehended with relative ease.
      International relations seen from the realistic stand-point is perhaps the most dilemmatical realm of human life. The guide to tactical diplomacy is therefore more demanding than in any other realms of human existence.
      Accordingly, an attempt is made here to restore the idea of prudence with emphasis on its philosophical dimensions and with special reference to international relations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼