RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      What Determines the Corporate Response Level to Climate Change?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105154380

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to examine various corporate characteristics that influence the corporate response level to climate change. We classified corporate characteristics into financial structure, governance structure and stakeholder pressure, and disclosure of climate change information and related environmental risks, and analyzed each characteristic’s impact on corporate reactions to climate change. The sample included 250 Korean companies that participated in the CDP survey and agreed to the survey information disclosure between 2011 and 2013. The empirical analysis results suggest a greater level of corporate response to climate change from companies that are larger in size and have lower leverage ratio and greater growth potential. In terms of governance structure and stakeholder pressure, the presence of board members making environmental decisions, high minority shareholder ratio, and low greenhouse gas emission per revenue have resulted in higher response levels to climate change. Additionally, companies that voluntarily published sustainability reports show a higher response level to climate change. The result indicates that sizable companies with financial stability and higher growth potential, acknowledged by the capital market, are more active in responding to climate change. Moreover, management attitude has a direct relationship with corporate response level to climate change. Diversified ownership among various stakeholders acts as pressure on making environmental decisions, and companies whose activities are more exposed to outside stakeholders are involved in more activities to satisfy stakeholder expectations. Finally, external stakeholders regard emission per revenue, that is, carbon intensity, not the absolute amount of emission, as corporate risk, and thus, companies actively engage in resolving the risks related to carbon intensity.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to examine various corporate characteristics that influence the corporate response level to climate change. We classified corporate characteristics into financial structure, governance structure and stakeholder pressure, a...

      The purpose of this study is to examine various corporate characteristics that influence the corporate response level to climate change. We classified corporate characteristics into financial structure, governance structure and stakeholder pressure, and disclosure of climate change information and related environmental risks, and analyzed each characteristic’s impact on corporate reactions to climate change. The sample included 250 Korean companies that participated in the CDP survey and agreed to the survey information disclosure between 2011 and 2013. The empirical analysis results suggest a greater level of corporate response to climate change from companies that are larger in size and have lower leverage ratio and greater growth potential. In terms of governance structure and stakeholder pressure, the presence of board members making environmental decisions, high minority shareholder ratio, and low greenhouse gas emission per revenue have resulted in higher response levels to climate change. Additionally, companies that voluntarily published sustainability reports show a higher response level to climate change. The result indicates that sizable companies with financial stability and higher growth potential, acknowledged by the capital market, are more active in responding to climate change. Moreover, management attitude has a direct relationship with corporate response level to climate change. Diversified ownership among various stakeholders acts as pressure on making environmental decisions, and companies whose activities are more exposed to outside stakeholders are involved in more activities to satisfy stakeholder expectations. Finally, external stakeholders regard emission per revenue, that is, carbon intensity, not the absolute amount of emission, as corporate risk, and thus, companies actively engage in resolving the risks related to carbon intensity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강경이, "사회적 활동(CSR)에 대한 공시가 초과수익률을 가져오나? -내부, 외부, 환경적 요인에 따라-" 한국상업교육학회 31 (31): 207-233, 2017

      2 김규리, "기업의 지속가능경영활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 전략적관리시스템 활용도를 중심으로" 한국상업교육학회 29 (29): 155-181, 2015

      3 Bragdon, J. H., "ls Pollution Profitable" 19 (19): 9-18, 1972

      4 Arora S, "Why Do Firms Volunteer to Exceed Environmental Regulations? Understanding Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program" 74 (74): 413-432, 1996

      5 Kim Eun-Hee, "When Does Institutional Investor Activism Increase Shareholder Value?: The Carbon Disclosure Project" 11 (11): 1-29, 2011

      6 Depoers, F., "Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports" 134 (134): 445-461, 2016

      7 Porter, M.E., "Toward a New Conception of the Environment - Competitiveness Relationship" 9 : 97-118, 1995

      8 Shrivastava, P., "The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability" 20 (20): 936-960, 1995

      9 Clarkson, P. M., "The Market Valuation of Environmental Capital Expenditures by Pulp and Paper Companies" 79 (79): 329-353, 2004

      10 Klassen RD, "The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance" 42 (42): 559-615, 1999

      1 강경이, "사회적 활동(CSR)에 대한 공시가 초과수익률을 가져오나? -내부, 외부, 환경적 요인에 따라-" 한국상업교육학회 31 (31): 207-233, 2017

      2 김규리, "기업의 지속가능경영활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 전략적관리시스템 활용도를 중심으로" 한국상업교육학회 29 (29): 155-181, 2015

      3 Bragdon, J. H., "ls Pollution Profitable" 19 (19): 9-18, 1972

      4 Arora S, "Why Do Firms Volunteer to Exceed Environmental Regulations? Understanding Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program" 74 (74): 413-432, 1996

      5 Kim Eun-Hee, "When Does Institutional Investor Activism Increase Shareholder Value?: The Carbon Disclosure Project" 11 (11): 1-29, 2011

      6 Depoers, F., "Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports" 134 (134): 445-461, 2016

      7 Porter, M.E., "Toward a New Conception of the Environment - Competitiveness Relationship" 9 : 97-118, 1995

      8 Shrivastava, P., "The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability" 20 (20): 936-960, 1995

      9 Clarkson, P. M., "The Market Valuation of Environmental Capital Expenditures by Pulp and Paper Companies" 79 (79): 329-353, 2004

      10 Klassen RD, "The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance" 42 (42): 559-615, 1999

      11 Mill, G., "The Financial Performance of an Socially Responsible Investment Over Time and Possible Link with Corportate Social Responsibility" 63 : 131-148, 2006

      12 Naila. D.L., "The Effect of Environmental Regulations on Financial Performance in Tanzania: A Survey of Manufacturing Companies Quoted on the Dar Es Salaam Stock Exchange" 3 (3): 99-112, 2013

      13 Kim, Y. B., "The Effect of Carbon Risk on the Cost of Equity Capital" 93 : 279-287, 2015

      14 Freeman, R.E., "Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach" Pittman-Ballinger 1984

      15 Murphy PR, "Role and Relavance of Logistics to Corporate Environmentalism : an Empirical Assessment" 25 (25): 41778-, 1995

      16 Waddock SA, "Responsibility: The New Business Imperative" 16 (16): 132-148, 2003

      17 Winsemius, P., "Responding to the Environmental Challenge" 35 (35): 12-20, 1992

      18 Reid E. M., "Responding to Public and Private Politics: Corporate Disclosure of Climate Change Strategies" 30 : 1157-1178, 2009

      19 Dunning JH., "Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in An Age of Alliance Capitalism" 26 (26): 461-485, 1995

      20 Hunt CB, "Proactive Environmental Strategies: Avoiding the Toxic Trap" 31 (31): 41838-, 1990

      21 Buysse K, "Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Managerment Perspective" 24 (24): 453-470, 2003

      22 Berry M.A, "Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution" 12 (12): 38-50, 1998

      23 Keller W, "Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to U.S. State" 84 (84): 691-703, 2002

      24 Yu, J., "Organizational Visibility, Stakeholder Environmental Pressure and Corporate Environmental Responsiveness in China" 26 (26): 371-384, 2017

      25 Quazi HA, "Motivation for ISO 14000 Certification: Development of a Predictive Model" 29 (29): 525-542, 2001

      26 List JA, "Measuring the Effects of Air Quality Regulations on 'Dirty' Firm Births;Evidence from the Neo- and Mature-Regulatory Periods" 79 (79): 177-190, 2000

      27 Lee, S. Y., "Market Responses to Firms' Voluntary Climate Change Information Disclosure and Carbon Communication" 22 (22): 1-12, 2015

      28 Gupta AK, "Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations" 21 (21): 473-486, 2000

      29 Walley, N., "It's Not Easy Being Green" 72 (72): 46-52, 1994

      30 Mahapatra, S., "Investors Reaction to Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance" 11 : 29-40, 1981

      31 Magretta J., "Growth Through Global Sustainability: An Interview with Monsanto's CEO, Robert B. Shapiro" 75 (75): 78-88, 1997

      32 Porter, M.E., "Green and Competitive: Ending and Stalemate" 73 : 120-134, 1995

      33 Fineman S, "Green Stakeholders: Industry Interpretations and Response" 33 (33): 715-730, 1996

      34 Maxwell J, "Green Schemes: Corporate Environmental Strategies and Their Implementation" 39 (39): 118-134, 1997

      35 Min H, "Green Purchasing Practices of US Firms" 21 (21): 1222-1238, 2001

      36 Christmann. P, "Globalization and the Environment: Strategies for International Voluntary Environmental Initiatives" 16 (16): 121-135, 2002

      37 Christmann. P, "Globalization and the Environment : Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China" 32 (32): 439-458, 2001

      38 Pedersen, E. R. G., "From Resistance to Opportunity-seeking: Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Nordic Fashion Industry" 119 (119): 245-264, 2014

      39 Daly HE., "Fostering Environmentally Sustainable Development: Four Parting Suggestions for the World Bank" 10 (10): 183-187, 1994

      40 Industry News, "Ford and GM Demand ISO 14000 Compliance" 38 (38): 41987-, 1999

      41 Ella Mae Matsumura, "Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures" 89 (89): 695-724, 2014

      42 Vastag G, "Evaluation of Corporate Environmental Management Approaches: A Framework and Application" 43 : 193-211, 1996

      43 Cohen, M., "Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related?" Owen Graduate School of Management. Vanderbilt University 1995

      44 Shrivastava, P., "Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage" 16 : 183-200, 1995

      45 Jeppesen T, "Environmental Regulations and New Plant Location Decisions : Evidence from a Metaanalysis" 42 (42): 19-49, 2002

      46 Jaffe, A., "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What does the Evidence tell Us?" 33 : 132-163, 1995

      47 Del Brio JA, "Environmental Managers and Departments as Driving Forces of TQEM in Spanish Industrial Companies" 18 (18): 495-511, 2001

      48 Gupta AK., "Environmental Management and Its Impact on the Operations Function" 15 (15): 34-51, 1994

      49 Becker R., "Effects of Air Quality Regulation on Polluting Industries" 108 (108): 379-421, 2000

      50 Henderson JV., "Effects of Air Quality Regulation" 86 (86): 789-813, 1996

      51 Jennings PD, "Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: an Institutional Approach" 20 (20): 1015-1052, 1995

      52 Dunn S., "Down to Business on Climate Change: An Overview of Corporate Strategies" 39 : 27-41, 2002

      53 Konar S, "Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?" 83 (83): 281-289, 2001

      54 Halme, M., "Does Corporate Environmental Protection Increase Or Decrease Shareholder Value? The Case Of Environmental Investments" 10 : 200-214, 2001

      55 Murray, A., "Do Market Financial Market Care About Social and Environmental Disclosure?" 19 : 228-255, 2006

      56 Lewis, B. W., "Difference in Degrees: CEO Characteristics and Firm Environmental Disclosure" 35 : 712-722, 2014

      57 Rugman AM, "Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework" 19 (19): 363-375, 1998

      58 Freeman RE, "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Approach" 34 (34): 92-96, 1991

      59 Luo, L., "Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report" 23 : 93-120, 2012

      60 Jizi, M. I., "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector" 125 (125): 601-615, 2014

      61 Banerjee SB., "Corporate Environmentalism: The Construct and its Measurement" 55 (55): 177-191, 2002

      62 Stanny E., "Corporate Environmental Disclosures about the Effects of Climate Change" 15 : 338-348, 2008

      63 Matisoff, D. C., "Convergence in Environmental Reporting: Assessing the Carbon Disclosure Project" 22 : 285-305, 2013

      64 Porter, M.E., "Competitive Strategy" Free Press 179-191, 1980

      65 Dawkins, C., "Coming Clean: The Impact of Environmental Performance and Visibility on Corporate Climate Change Disclosure" 100 (100): 303-322, 2011

      66 Vastag G., "Certifying Environmental Management Systems by the ISO 14001Standards" 40 (40): 4743-4763, 2002

      67 Ben-Amar, W., "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project" 142 (142): 369-383, 2017

      68 Melnyk SA, "Assessing the Impact of Environmental Management Systems on Corporate and Environmental Performance" 21 (21): 329-351, 2003

      69 Johnston. D., "An Investigation of Regulatory and Voluntary Environmental Capital Expenditures" 24 : 175-206, 2005

      70 Clarkson MBE., "A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluationg Corporate Social Performance" 29 (29): 92-117, 1995

      71 Russo M. V., "A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability" 40 (40): 534-559, 1997

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.16 1.16 1.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.07 1.02 1.378 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼