RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      치매와 우울증의 감별을 위한 한국어판 간이정신상태검사의 차별문항 추출 = Measuring Cognition in Elderly People : Mini-Mental State Examination-Korean Version

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99657360

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives:The Mini-Mental State Examination is arguably the most widely used screening measure for cognitive impairment. The aims of this study are to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination- Korean Version(MMSE-KC) as a quantitative measure of cognitive ability. Methods:Data were analyzed from a total of 312 participants age 65 or older from cross-sectional community-based study, which were collected about demographic information and individual item responses to MMSE-KC. Item response theory was used to analyze individual items. Results:Comparison of the data with a unidimensional 2-parameter model indicated that the total score obtained by summing across all items yields a reliable(0.78) quantitative estimate of global cognitive ability. All items fit the model and together spanned a range of difficulty(threshold parameter) from -3.86(easier) to 1.15(more difficult) logits, and discrimination(slope parameter) from 0.55 to 8.6 logits. The items about ‘recall of three words’ and ‘attention’ were the most difficult items and have most powerful discrimination parameter. Copying pentagons and time(year) orientation were more difficult than the other items. The patients with dementia showed differential item functioning such items as orientation to place, the last two items of ‘recall of three words’, the last two items of ‘attention’, and ‘three stage command’. Conclusion:The MMSE-KC can provide a reliable and valid quantitative estimate of cognitive ability. More attention should be paid to the difficult items like ‘recall of three words’ and ‘attention’ for the discrimination of dementia from non-dementia people.
      번역하기

      Objectives:The Mini-Mental State Examination is arguably the most widely used screening measure for cognitive impairment. The aims of this study are to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination- Korean Version(MMSE-KC...

      Objectives:The Mini-Mental State Examination is arguably the most widely used screening measure for cognitive impairment. The aims of this study are to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination- Korean Version(MMSE-KC) as a quantitative measure of cognitive ability. Methods:Data were analyzed from a total of 312 participants age 65 or older from cross-sectional community-based study, which were collected about demographic information and individual item responses to MMSE-KC. Item response theory was used to analyze individual items. Results:Comparison of the data with a unidimensional 2-parameter model indicated that the total score obtained by summing across all items yields a reliable(0.78) quantitative estimate of global cognitive ability. All items fit the model and together spanned a range of difficulty(threshold parameter) from -3.86(easier) to 1.15(more difficult) logits, and discrimination(slope parameter) from 0.55 to 8.6 logits. The items about ‘recall of three words’ and ‘attention’ were the most difficult items and have most powerful discrimination parameter. Copying pentagons and time(year) orientation were more difficult than the other items. The patients with dementia showed differential item functioning such items as orientation to place, the last two items of ‘recall of three words’, the last two items of ‘attention’, and ‘three stage command’. Conclusion:The MMSE-KC can provide a reliable and valid quantitative estimate of cognitive ability. More attention should be paid to the difficult items like ‘recall of three words’ and ‘attention’ for the discrimination of dementia from non-dementia people.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 서론 대상 및 방법 결과 고찰 결론 참고문헌
      • 서론 대상 및 방법 결과 고찰 결론 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장성만, "한국인의 우울증 진단기준의 특성" 대한신경정신의학회 46 (46): 447-452, 2007

      2 조맹제, "한국어판 Composite International Diagnostic Interview(K-CIDI)의 개발" 대한신경정신의학회 41 (41): 2002

      3 Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician" 12 : 189-198, 1975

      4 Emery VO, "Update on the dementia spectrum of depression" 149 : 305-317, 1992

      5 Alexopoulos GS, "The course of geriatric depression with “reversible dementia”: a controlled study" 150 : 1693-1699, 1993

      6 Baker FB, "The basics of item response theory. 2nd ed" ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation 2001

      7 Lockwood KA, "Subtypes of cognitive impairment in depressed older adults" 8 : 201-208, 2000

      8 Brodaty H, "Prognosis of depression in the elderly. A com-parison with younger patients" 163 : 589-596, 1993

      9 Stoudemire A, "Neuropsychological and biomedical assessment of depression-dementia syndromes" 1 : 347-361, 1989

      10 이동영, "Mini-Mental State Examination의 한국 노인 정상규준 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 41 (41): 2002

      1 장성만, "한국인의 우울증 진단기준의 특성" 대한신경정신의학회 46 (46): 447-452, 2007

      2 조맹제, "한국어판 Composite International Diagnostic Interview(K-CIDI)의 개발" 대한신경정신의학회 41 (41): 2002

      3 Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician" 12 : 189-198, 1975

      4 Emery VO, "Update on the dementia spectrum of depression" 149 : 305-317, 1992

      5 Alexopoulos GS, "The course of geriatric depression with “reversible dementia”: a controlled study" 150 : 1693-1699, 1993

      6 Baker FB, "The basics of item response theory. 2nd ed" ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation 2001

      7 Lockwood KA, "Subtypes of cognitive impairment in depressed older adults" 8 : 201-208, 2000

      8 Brodaty H, "Prognosis of depression in the elderly. A com-parison with younger patients" 163 : 589-596, 1993

      9 Stoudemire A, "Neuropsychological and biomedical assessment of depression-dementia syndromes" 1 : 347-361, 1989

      10 이동영, "Mini-Mental State Examination의 한국 노인 정상규준 연구" 대한신경정신의학회 41 (41): 2002

      11 Saez-Fonseca JA, "Long-term outcome of depressive pseudodementia in the elderly" 101 : 123-129, 2007

      12 Benjamin JS, "Kaplan and Sadocks Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry" LLW 2009

      13 Chang CH, "Item response theory and its applications to patient-reported outcomes measurement" 28 : 264-282, 2005

      14 Katz IR, "Diagnosis and treatment of depression in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias" 59 : 38-44, 1998

      15 Welsh K, "Detection of abnormal memory decline in mild cases of Alzheimer’s disease using CERAD neuropsychological measures" 48 : 278-281, 1991

      16 Reding M, "Depression in patients referred to a dementia clinic. A three-year prospective study" 42 : 894-896, 1985

      17 Korczyn AD, "Depression and dementia" 283 : 139-142, 2009

      18 Thomas AJ, "Depression and cognition in older adults" 21 : 8-13, 2008

      19 Becker JT, "Depressed mood is not a risk factor for incident dementia in a community-based cohort" 17 : 653-663, 2009

      20 Benedict KB, "Dementia and depression in the elderly: a framework for addressing difficulties in differential diagnosis" 10 : 513-537, 1990

      21 Speedie L, "Confrontation naming deficit in dementia of depression" 23 : 59-63, 1990

      22 Reys BN, "Brief cognitive evaluation and diagnosis of dementia, depression, and psychosis in the elderly" 52 : 401-404, 2006

      23 Knopman DS, "A verbal memory test with high predictive accuracy for dementia of the Alzheimer type" 46 : 141-145, 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.62 0.62 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.64 1.34 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼