RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      논문 : 아케다와 자크 데리다의 윤리적 종교성 = The Akedah and Jacques Derrida`s Ethical Religiosity

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82500666

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Among lots of Derrida`s works, The Gift of Death would be the one of the best writings that can demonstrate his religious interests. In this book, Derrida tries to show his understanding concerning religious faith and ethic through his interpretation of the famous story of the Akedah(binding Isaac) in the Bible. Derrida`s interpretation of the Akedah proceeds as he interacts and responds to two other interpreters of the story before him, Kierkegaard and Levinas. Like Kierkegaard, Derrida understands that religious faith as ``repetition`` is secret and cannot be shared or be transferred. Also like Kierkegaard, Derrida thinks the conflict between the human responsibility to God and the human responsibility to family and society is inevitable. However, while Kierkegaard`s interpretation of the Akedah focuses on the superiority of the responsibility to God to the responsibility toward family and society, Derrida`s interpretation tries to show the aporia in religious faith and ethic. According to Derrida, the conflict and aporia in religious faith and human ethic also can be found in other human relations. On the one hand, Derrida recognizes the characteristic of religious faith, and on the other hand, he does not want to discard the ethic for the other. In order to develop ethical religiosity, Derrida wants to consider Levinasian ethic of the other, although Levinas`s interpretation of the Akedah is very different from Kierkegaard`s interpretation. And unlike Kierkegaard, Derrida emphasizes one`s responsibility to every other. His ethical concern is found in this brief expression: "tout autre est tout autre, every other (one) is every (bit) other." Although Derrida never wants to identify himself as a religious believer, it is very probable that he has his own religiosity.
      번역하기

      Among lots of Derrida`s works, The Gift of Death would be the one of the best writings that can demonstrate his religious interests. In this book, Derrida tries to show his understanding concerning religious faith and ethic through his interpretation ...

      Among lots of Derrida`s works, The Gift of Death would be the one of the best writings that can demonstrate his religious interests. In this book, Derrida tries to show his understanding concerning religious faith and ethic through his interpretation of the famous story of the Akedah(binding Isaac) in the Bible. Derrida`s interpretation of the Akedah proceeds as he interacts and responds to two other interpreters of the story before him, Kierkegaard and Levinas. Like Kierkegaard, Derrida understands that religious faith as ``repetition`` is secret and cannot be shared or be transferred. Also like Kierkegaard, Derrida thinks the conflict between the human responsibility to God and the human responsibility to family and society is inevitable. However, while Kierkegaard`s interpretation of the Akedah focuses on the superiority of the responsibility to God to the responsibility toward family and society, Derrida`s interpretation tries to show the aporia in religious faith and ethic. According to Derrida, the conflict and aporia in religious faith and human ethic also can be found in other human relations. On the one hand, Derrida recognizes the characteristic of religious faith, and on the other hand, he does not want to discard the ethic for the other. In order to develop ethical religiosity, Derrida wants to consider Levinasian ethic of the other, although Levinas`s interpretation of the Akedah is very different from Kierkegaard`s interpretation. And unlike Kierkegaard, Derrida emphasizes one`s responsibility to every other. His ethical concern is found in this brief expression: "tout autre est tout autre, every other (one) is every (bit) other." Although Derrida never wants to identify himself as a religious believer, it is very probable that he has his own religiosity.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼