RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국법상 입양승낙의 철회기간 = Special Issues : On the Withdrawal of consent in American Adoption Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A87015808

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Texas Adoption Law allows natural parents to withdraw arbitrarily their consent prior to the entry of a final decree of adoption without considering the child`s welfare. Prospective adoptive parents in Texas will presumably continue to argue this kind of formalistic law. If the legislatures in these jurisdictions continue to allow this practice, rapid discourage of adoptions and serious damage of child`s psychological well-being will occur. The best solution for this kind of states would be to create the best interests of the child standard. Some states which prohibit revocation except in cases of fraud or duress, obviously succeed in providing stability in adoptions. However, perhaps a very short cooling off period would be more compassionate for the natural parents who very often find it so difficult to consent to adoption and thus experience mixed feelings. Giving natural parents short cooling off period to revoke consent is certainly very limited. After that period, the consent would be irrevocable absent fraud or duress. There are many doubts whether jurisdictions prohibiting revocation except in cases of fraud or duress accomplish the goal of providing what is best for the child or not. Moreover, there could be cases, such as when the child is not yet in the adoptive home. In these cases, perhaps it would be a better alternative to allow natural parents to revoke consent if their child has not yet been placed in an adoptive home, and the parents can prove revocation would be in the child`s best interests. As long as those courts having the discretion to determine the child`s best interests base their decisions on the child`s psychological development, it appears that those decisions will bring about the best results for the children. Many states have greatly improved considering the child`s best interests in withdrawal of consent to adoption, but they still continue striving to accomplish what is best for the children.
    번역하기

    Texas Adoption Law allows natural parents to withdraw arbitrarily their consent prior to the entry of a final decree of adoption without considering the child`s welfare. Prospective adoptive parents in Texas will presumably continue to argue this kind...

    Texas Adoption Law allows natural parents to withdraw arbitrarily their consent prior to the entry of a final decree of adoption without considering the child`s welfare. Prospective adoptive parents in Texas will presumably continue to argue this kind of formalistic law. If the legislatures in these jurisdictions continue to allow this practice, rapid discourage of adoptions and serious damage of child`s psychological well-being will occur. The best solution for this kind of states would be to create the best interests of the child standard. Some states which prohibit revocation except in cases of fraud or duress, obviously succeed in providing stability in adoptions. However, perhaps a very short cooling off period would be more compassionate for the natural parents who very often find it so difficult to consent to adoption and thus experience mixed feelings. Giving natural parents short cooling off period to revoke consent is certainly very limited. After that period, the consent would be irrevocable absent fraud or duress. There are many doubts whether jurisdictions prohibiting revocation except in cases of fraud or duress accomplish the goal of providing what is best for the child or not. Moreover, there could be cases, such as when the child is not yet in the adoptive home. In these cases, perhaps it would be a better alternative to allow natural parents to revoke consent if their child has not yet been placed in an adoptive home, and the parents can prove revocation would be in the child`s best interests. As long as those courts having the discretion to determine the child`s best interests base their decisions on the child`s psychological development, it appears that those decisions will bring about the best results for the children. Many states have greatly improved considering the child`s best interests in withdrawal of consent to adoption, but they still continue striving to accomplish what is best for the children.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼