RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    금융기관의 공공성과 CSR = The Financial Institution`s Public Purpose and CSR

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99769236

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The financial crisis reminds us how entwined some corporations - notably large financial corporations - are with the economy and society. Although a number of factors contributed to the downturns of the past century, corporate disregard for the greater public interest played a role. The problem with the dominant conception - shareholder primacy and wealth maximization - is that the directors are encouraged to demonstrate their allegiance to shareholder interests. This behavior leads to an unremitting focus on the short term. By the turn of the twentieth century, corporations, especially global investment banks, had become so fixated on increasing profits that they paid little attention to the public impact of their action. The starting place for any proposed reform is simple acknowledgment that corporations should be restrained by public responsibility. This is barely hurdle, since most scholars and commentators acknowledge that corporations have ethical duties, and a public purpose has historically guided corporate activity. Unfortunately, corporations are not required to perform acts that are beneficial to society ; rather, they merely need to refrain from acts that harm society. Some scholars insist that the public duty must be defined and codified. The United Kingdom enacted the Companies Act of 2006, which could offer guidance for what might the legislation of public purpose look like. Recently the banks in Korea published the historical profit maximization, but only to be criticized. Because even though the bank is a company, it must perform the public purpose. Therefore the financial institution should consider the public purpose as well as wealth maximization in its activity.
    번역하기

    The financial crisis reminds us how entwined some corporations - notably large financial corporations - are with the economy and society. Although a number of factors contributed to the downturns of the past century, corporate disregard for the greate...

    The financial crisis reminds us how entwined some corporations - notably large financial corporations - are with the economy and society. Although a number of factors contributed to the downturns of the past century, corporate disregard for the greater public interest played a role. The problem with the dominant conception - shareholder primacy and wealth maximization - is that the directors are encouraged to demonstrate their allegiance to shareholder interests. This behavior leads to an unremitting focus on the short term. By the turn of the twentieth century, corporations, especially global investment banks, had become so fixated on increasing profits that they paid little attention to the public impact of their action. The starting place for any proposed reform is simple acknowledgment that corporations should be restrained by public responsibility. This is barely hurdle, since most scholars and commentators acknowledge that corporations have ethical duties, and a public purpose has historically guided corporate activity. Unfortunately, corporations are not required to perform acts that are beneficial to society ; rather, they merely need to refrain from acts that harm society. Some scholars insist that the public duty must be defined and codified. The United Kingdom enacted the Companies Act of 2006, which could offer guidance for what might the legislation of public purpose look like. Recently the banks in Korea published the historical profit maximization, but only to be criticized. Because even though the bank is a company, it must perform the public purpose. Therefore the financial institution should consider the public purpose as well as wealth maximization in its activity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이지언, "혁신형 중소기업 지원을 위한 금융환경 개선방안" 한국금융연구원 2012

    2 중소기업청, "중소기업연차보고서" 2012

    3 김영규, "재무관리" 유원북스 2013

    4 이병윤, "은행의 상업성과 사회적 역할" 한국금융연구원 2012

    5 정찬형, "은행법" 박영사 2005

    6 손상호, "서민금융의 발전방향" 한국금융연구원 2013

    7 금융위원회, "서민금융 지원성과 및 향후 계획(보도자료)"

    8 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제16판)" 박영사 2013

    9 김화진, "상법강의" 박영사 2013

    10 강병호, "금융기관론" 박영사 2009

    1 이지언, "혁신형 중소기업 지원을 위한 금융환경 개선방안" 한국금융연구원 2012

    2 중소기업청, "중소기업연차보고서" 2012

    3 김영규, "재무관리" 유원북스 2013

    4 이병윤, "은행의 상업성과 사회적 역할" 한국금융연구원 2012

    5 정찬형, "은행법" 박영사 2005

    6 손상호, "서민금융의 발전방향" 한국금융연구원 2013

    7 금융위원회, "서민금융 지원성과 및 향후 계획(보도자료)"

    8 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제16판)" 박영사 2013

    9 김화진, "상법강의" 박영사 2013

    10 강병호, "금융기관론" 박영사 2009

    11 이준구, "경제학원론" 법문사 2010

    12 장덕조, "企業의 社會的 責任 -會社本質論을 中心으로-" 한국상사법학회 29 (29): 83-132, 2010

    13 Milton Friedman, "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits"

    14 Cynthia A. Williams, "The Securities and Exchange Commission and Corporate Social Responsibility" 112 : 1197-, 1999

    15 Peter F. Drucker, "The New Society"

    16 Joseph Lanzkron, "The Hedge Fund Holdup : The SEC's Repeated Unnecessary Attacks on the Hedge Fund Industry" 73 : 1509-, 2008

    17 Frank H. Easterbrook, "The Economic Structure of Corporate Law"

    18 C. A. Harwell Wells, "The Cycles of Corporate Social Responsibility : A Historical Retrospective for the Twenty-First Century" 51 : 77-, 2002

    19 Peter F. Drucker, "The Concept of the Corporation"

    20 Adolf A. Berle, Jr., "The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution 5"

    21 Adolf A. Berle, Jr., "For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees : A Note" 45 : 1365-, 1932

    22 E. Merrick Dodd, Jr., "For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?" 45 : 1145-, 1932

    23 Thomas P. Byrne, "False Profits : Reviving the Corporation's Public Purpose" 57 : 25-, 2010

    24 Tom L. Beauchamp, "Ethical Theory and Business" Pearson Prentice Hall 2009

    25 E. Merrick Dodd, Jr., "Dogma and Practice in the Law of Associations" 42 : 977-, 1929

    26 Adolf A. Berle, Jr., "Corporate Power as Powers in Trust" 44 : 1049-, 1931

    27 Lynn A. Stout, "Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy" 75 : 1189-, 2002

    28 David L. Engel, "An Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility" 32 : 1-, 1979

    29 전국은행연합회, "2011은행사회공헌활동보고서" 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.77 0.77 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.65 0.772 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼