RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인간의 존엄과 가치, 그리고 胚芽 - 생명윤리및안전에관한법률 제1장을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76461765

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Nowadays biotechnology or bioengineering is being rapidly developed offering many possibilities in the life, including human embryonic researches, on the other hand, constitutional approach on the scientific studies, in particular, on the focus of ‘human dignity’ are still ambiguous. This article recognizes that scientific and technological developments have been, and can be, of great benefit to humankind in increasing inter alia life expectancy and improving quality of life, and emphasizes that such developments should always seek to promote the welfare of individuals, families, groups or communities and humankind as a whole in the recognition of the dignity of the human person and the universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms.<BR>  Human embryo is an in vitro fertilized human ovum, with certain rights and protection granted by substantive law, composed of one or more living human cells and human genetic material so unified and organized that it will develop in uterus into an unborn child. Nevertheless the human embryo research raises many bioethics problems and violates the dignity of human being, the Korean Bioethics and Biosafety Law(Law No. 7150, hereafter the Bioethics Law) doesn"t works at all because of the inappropriate aim of the law. The Bioethics Law ought to serve and protect the dignity of human being than any other related laws.<BR>  In this thesis, I attempted to make a study of the Bioethics Law from a viewpoint of human dignity in the constitutional law. With respect to the human dignity, this essay tried to critical analyse of the Chapter I in the Bioethics Law in effect from 2005 allowing cloning of human cells if it is carried out for pure research purposes to find remedies for incurable diseases. The most problematic aspect of the Bioethics Law is that embryos tissue would be allowed to used for research purposes. This article frames human dignity, specially focusing on at first, the concept and the legal status of human embryo as a potential human being, and secondly ‘informed consent’ that are worldwide declared such as N?remberg Code and Helsinki Declaration which stress that human subject should be never measure and voluntary consent is absolutely important. It is no surprise that these international norms for protection of bioethics have been developed and some progress has been achieved, serious dispute of human rights and biosafty.<BR>  Human Dignity in the constitutional law should be the extreme measure of the biotechnological norm and the powerful sanction, because the human embryo is de facto biologically human being, gradually acquiring certain capacities, namely entitled to rights worthy of respect and protection, namely human dignity of embryo. So the constitutional concerns involving the application of technology to humans should be of utmost concern, as the area is extremely complex, but the concept of human dignity should be based upon an acceptance of fundamental and superior values within the bioethics.
    번역하기

      Nowadays biotechnology or bioengineering is being rapidly developed offering many possibilities in the life, including human embryonic researches, on the other hand, constitutional approach on the scientific studies, in particular, on the ...

      Nowadays biotechnology or bioengineering is being rapidly developed offering many possibilities in the life, including human embryonic researches, on the other hand, constitutional approach on the scientific studies, in particular, on the focus of ‘human dignity’ are still ambiguous. This article recognizes that scientific and technological developments have been, and can be, of great benefit to humankind in increasing inter alia life expectancy and improving quality of life, and emphasizes that such developments should always seek to promote the welfare of individuals, families, groups or communities and humankind as a whole in the recognition of the dignity of the human person and the universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms.<BR>  Human embryo is an in vitro fertilized human ovum, with certain rights and protection granted by substantive law, composed of one or more living human cells and human genetic material so unified and organized that it will develop in uterus into an unborn child. Nevertheless the human embryo research raises many bioethics problems and violates the dignity of human being, the Korean Bioethics and Biosafety Law(Law No. 7150, hereafter the Bioethics Law) doesn"t works at all because of the inappropriate aim of the law. The Bioethics Law ought to serve and protect the dignity of human being than any other related laws.<BR>  In this thesis, I attempted to make a study of the Bioethics Law from a viewpoint of human dignity in the constitutional law. With respect to the human dignity, this essay tried to critical analyse of the Chapter I in the Bioethics Law in effect from 2005 allowing cloning of human cells if it is carried out for pure research purposes to find remedies for incurable diseases. The most problematic aspect of the Bioethics Law is that embryos tissue would be allowed to used for research purposes. This article frames human dignity, specially focusing on at first, the concept and the legal status of human embryo as a potential human being, and secondly ‘informed consent’ that are worldwide declared such as N?remberg Code and Helsinki Declaration which stress that human subject should be never measure and voluntary consent is absolutely important. It is no surprise that these international norms for protection of bioethics have been developed and some progress has been achieved, serious dispute of human rights and biosafty.<BR>  Human Dignity in the constitutional law should be the extreme measure of the biotechnological norm and the powerful sanction, because the human embryo is de facto biologically human being, gradually acquiring certain capacities, namely entitled to rights worthy of respect and protection, namely human dignity of embryo. So the constitutional concerns involving the application of technology to humans should be of utmost concern, as the area is extremely complex, but the concept of human dignity should be based upon an acceptance of fundamental and superior values within the bioethics.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "황우석교수 연구의혹 관련 조사결과 보고서" 2006.1.10

    2 "현대위험사회에서의 형법상 귀속구조의 변화" 3 (3): 2001

    3 "헌재결 2005. 2. 3. 2001헌가9"

    4 "헌재결 2005. 2. 24. 2003헌마31"

    5 "헌재결 2003. 3. 27. 2000헌마474"

    6 "헌재결 2002. 12. 18. 2002헌바12"

    7 "헌재결 2001. 7. 19. 2000헌마546"

    8 "헌재결 1998. 5. 28. 96헌가5"

    9 "헌법학(中)" 박영사 2004

    10 "프랑스철학사" 문예출판사 1992

    1 "황우석교수 연구의혹 관련 조사결과 보고서" 2006.1.10

    2 "현대위험사회에서의 형법상 귀속구조의 변화" 3 (3): 2001

    3 "헌재결 2005. 2. 3. 2001헌가9"

    4 "헌재결 2005. 2. 24. 2003헌마31"

    5 "헌재결 2003. 3. 27. 2000헌마474"

    6 "헌재결 2002. 12. 18. 2002헌바12"

    7 "헌재결 2001. 7. 19. 2000헌마546"

    8 "헌재결 1998. 5. 28. 96헌가5"

    9 "헌법학(中)" 박영사 2004

    10 "프랑스철학사" 문예출판사 1992

    11 "철학적 인간학 연구" 1982

    12 "착상이전단게에서 배아생명보호" (16) : 2001

    13 "인간존엄의 헌법적 접근 1991년도 중앙대학교 박사학위논문"

    14 "인간복제의 금지필요성과 제한적 허용연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2001

    15 "인간배아의 인격지위에 관한 고찰" 한국생명윤리학회 3 (3): 2002.12

    16 "인간배아복제에 대한 윤리적 고찰" 사목 2003.2

    17 "인간배아 간세포의 생산과 과학적치료적 활용에 관한 선언" 2000

    18 "유전자복제와 인간의 정체성" 철학과 현실 (39) : 1998

    19 "오늘의 철학적 인간학" 경문사 1997

    20 "생명의 위기" 푸른나무 2001

    21 "생명윤리의 철학" 철학과 현실사 2001

    22 "생명윤리와 인권보편선언의 권고사항과 국내실천을 위한 제언" 2006

    23 "생명윤리와 민법" 한국법학원 (65) : 2002.2

    24 "생명윤리및안전에관한법률의 분석" 한국생명윤리학회 5 (5): 2004

    25 "생명윤리및안전에관한법률의 법정책적 문제점" 시민과 변호사 2005

    26 "생명윤리및안전에관한법률 개선안 및 생명윤리 가이드라인 초안개발" 서울대학교 법학연구소 2004.9

    27 "생명윤리 보편규범과 모두를 위한 생명과학" 16 : 2005

    28 "생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률상의 처벌규정과 규제논거를 중심으로" 11집 (11집): 2005.2

    29 "생명윤리 및 안전관련 입법정책" 한국생명윤리학회 4 (4): 2003

    30 "생명복제와 인간의 존엄" 공법연구 제30집제1호

    31 "생명과학기술의 발전과 인간의 존엄" 미국헌법연구 제17집제2호

    32 "생명과학기술에 대한 국가별 위험인식의 차별적 구성" ELSI 연구 제4권2호

    33 "생명공학의 헌법적 가능성과 한계" 공법연구 제32집제1호

    34 "생명공학시대의 법과 윤리" 이화여자대학교출판부 2000

    35 "생명공학과 가톨릭윤리" 가톨릭대학교 출판부 2004

    36 "배아생명에 대한 법적 이해와 법정책의 방향" 한국형사정책연구원 2002

    37 "배아복제와 인간존엄성의 정치학" 법제연구 제20호

    38 "배아보호를 위한 형사정책" 한국형사정책연구원 2003

    39 "대판 1985. 6. 11. 84도1958"

    40 "남용된 인간의 존엄" 한국법철학회 3 (3): 2000

    41 "과학기술윤리와 국가의 역할 생명윤리를 중심으로"

    42 "醫療の法律學" 有斐閣, 東京 1998

    43 "生命倫理法案" 商事法務, 東京 2005

    44 "生命倫理と法" 弘文堂 東京 2005

    45 "http://www.zeit.de/2001/06/Kultur/200106_embryo.iii.html"

    46 "http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm"

    47 "Worshipping Autonomy" 26 : 44-, 1996

    48 "What is an Embryo?" 77 : 658-, 2002

    49 "What is an Embryo?" 36 : 1051-, 2004

    50 "The Stem Cell Debate in Historical Context" 1975

    51 "The Law of Bioethics: Individual Autonomy and Social Regulation" West Group, N.Y. 2003

    52 "The Intangibility of the Human Person" The Human Body 1952

    53 "Study Paper of U" k (k): 1991

    54 "Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission" 1999

    55 "Regulating Reproduction Law" Hart Publishing, Oxford Portland Oregon 2001

    56 "Regents of the University of California" 1990

    57 "Pandora's Progeny: Ethical Issues in Assisted Human Reproduction An Overview and Glance at the Future" 2005

    58 "Naturteleogie und Ethik Moralisch-ethische Probleme von Reproduktionsmedizin und Human0Gentechnik" 1994

    59 "Medical Ethics and Human Rights: Legacies of Nuremberg" 1999

    60 "Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts" 1995

    61 "Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Can The Law Balance Ethical, Scientific and Economic Values?" 18 : 2-, 2003

    62 "Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science" The MIT Press 2001

    63 "Droit Civil: Les Personnes, La famille" Les Incapacits, Dalloz, Paris 2003

    64 "Die Tyrannei der Wrde, Argumentationstheoretische Erwgungen zum Menschenwrdeprinzip" 1998

    65 "Die Person als ein Zweck an sich selbst" jz1990

    66 "Die Menschenwrde als Grundlage der staatlichen Gemeinschaft" 1987

    67 "Die Menschenwrde als Fundament der Grundrechte in" 1988

    68 "Derek, Human Fertilization & Embryology Regulating the Reproductive Revolution" Blackstone Press.London 2001

    69 "Christliche Ethik" Paulinus Verlag, Trier 1995

    70 "Banking on Discord: Property Conflicts in the Transplantation of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells" 39 : 1391-, 1997

    71 "A Companion to Genethics" Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2004

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.89 0.87 0.967 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼