RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국영화 비평을 위한 좌표들 ― 영화산업 환경의 변화를 중심으로 = A Few Signposts for Reviewing Chinese Films ― With a Focus on the Developments in the Film Industry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107354651

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper suggests a new way of understanding recent blockbuster films from China, considering what happened to the Chinese film market. Since the establishment of the New China (PRC), the Communist Party focused on using films as a tool of propaganda and political indoctrination, seeing the film industry as a “state-led business.” The reform and opening-up era brought a certain level of marketization into the culture sectors, including the film sector. Still, the change was not fundamental as demonstrated by the birth of the “main melody film,” which testified the Party took Chinese films for bearers of official state ideology, keeping them away from the growing marketization. This viewpoint was adopted widely and remains unchallenged, resulting in the recent successful Chinese blockbuster films still categorized as “main melody films.”
      This paper raises a question to this viewpoint, especially the validity of the concept “main melody film.” As we all know it, commercial films globally represent the mainstream ideologies. Still, only Chinese films are unchangeably labeled as “main melody films” (the term of which implicate the state-led production system). This labeling assumes that, firstly, we can draw clear lines between the state and the market, or the politics and economics, in China’s context; secondly, they are opposing each other, and the winner is the state. These assumptions might be valid during the period when the state took control of the Chinese film industry. Since then, the film industry has grown significantly with diversified emerging industries from production and distribution to consumption, which would undermine the validity of the said assumptions in the present context.
      Nowadays, the Chinese film market has turned great with China’s economic growth and overseas films’ frequent landing. As the main actor of the market, the Chinese film consumers express diverse needs and respond actively to the nation or state issues, being conscious of China’s new position as one of the G2. The film production system has also changed a lot, not only being highly “industrialized” but also being connected with high-end digital and IT technologies and other emerging areas. As the top player of the country’s culture industries, the film industry is speaking with its own voice now.
      As a result, in the recent Chinese film industry and market, people consume the mainstream ideologies through films, without the state’s manipulative interventions. The big-budget and micronarrative blockbuster films are selected by the market, not by the state, as a proper tool to show off rapidly evolving technologies and echo the mainstream ideologies. Against this backdrop, we need to develop a new understanding of Chinese films that incorporates the film industry’s observed changes.
      번역하기

      This paper suggests a new way of understanding recent blockbuster films from China, considering what happened to the Chinese film market. Since the establishment of the New China (PRC), the Communist Party focused on using films as a tool of propagand...

      This paper suggests a new way of understanding recent blockbuster films from China, considering what happened to the Chinese film market. Since the establishment of the New China (PRC), the Communist Party focused on using films as a tool of propaganda and political indoctrination, seeing the film industry as a “state-led business.” The reform and opening-up era brought a certain level of marketization into the culture sectors, including the film sector. Still, the change was not fundamental as demonstrated by the birth of the “main melody film,” which testified the Party took Chinese films for bearers of official state ideology, keeping them away from the growing marketization. This viewpoint was adopted widely and remains unchallenged, resulting in the recent successful Chinese blockbuster films still categorized as “main melody films.”
      This paper raises a question to this viewpoint, especially the validity of the concept “main melody film.” As we all know it, commercial films globally represent the mainstream ideologies. Still, only Chinese films are unchangeably labeled as “main melody films” (the term of which implicate the state-led production system). This labeling assumes that, firstly, we can draw clear lines between the state and the market, or the politics and economics, in China’s context; secondly, they are opposing each other, and the winner is the state. These assumptions might be valid during the period when the state took control of the Chinese film industry. Since then, the film industry has grown significantly with diversified emerging industries from production and distribution to consumption, which would undermine the validity of the said assumptions in the present context.
      Nowadays, the Chinese film market has turned great with China’s economic growth and overseas films’ frequent landing. As the main actor of the market, the Chinese film consumers express diverse needs and respond actively to the nation or state issues, being conscious of China’s new position as one of the G2. The film production system has also changed a lot, not only being highly “industrialized” but also being connected with high-end digital and IT technologies and other emerging areas. As the top player of the country’s culture industries, the film industry is speaking with its own voice now.
      As a result, in the recent Chinese film industry and market, people consume the mainstream ideologies through films, without the state’s manipulative interventions. The big-budget and micronarrative blockbuster films are selected by the market, not by the state, as a proper tool to show off rapidly evolving technologies and echo the mainstream ideologies. Against this backdrop, we need to develop a new understanding of Chinese films that incorporates the film industry’s observed changes.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박정수, "중국영화산업" 커뮤니케이션북스(주) 2015

      2 朴英順, "중국 대작상업 영화(大片)의 이데올로기 특징 - <영웅>, <공자>를 중심으로" 중국어문연구회 (74) : 305-330, 2016

      3 문재철, "민족주의 수사학으로서의 디지털 특수효과에 대한 연구" 한국영화학회 (33) : 315-338, 2007

      4 고정민, "미국영화와 한국영화의 흥행요인에 관한 비교연구 - 애국심 유발 요인을 중심으로 -" 한국문화산업학회 10 (10): 71-96, 2010

      5 김진공, "누가 유랑하는 지구를 구할 것인가? — 영화 《유랑지구》와 중국의 ‘인류운명공동체’ 이념" 중국어문학회 (68) : 113-134, 2019

      6 蘇星, "靑島"東方影都" : 影視産業與房地産開發" (20) : 2013

      7 余馨, "與馮小剛談《不見不散》" (1) : 44-46, 1999

      8 詹慶生, "産業化十年中國電影合拍片發展備忘(2002-2012)" (2) : 39-47, 2013

      9 尹鴻, "提升中國電影競爭力 : 工業化能力⋅人才建設⋅本土化和"走出去"策略" (6) : 4-14, 2017

      10 尹鴻, "從解放生産力走向提升競爭力―産業化改革十年來的中國電影制片業" (7) : 4-10, 2012

      1 박정수, "중국영화산업" 커뮤니케이션북스(주) 2015

      2 朴英順, "중국 대작상업 영화(大片)의 이데올로기 특징 - <영웅>, <공자>를 중심으로" 중국어문연구회 (74) : 305-330, 2016

      3 문재철, "민족주의 수사학으로서의 디지털 특수효과에 대한 연구" 한국영화학회 (33) : 315-338, 2007

      4 고정민, "미국영화와 한국영화의 흥행요인에 관한 비교연구 - 애국심 유발 요인을 중심으로 -" 한국문화산업학회 10 (10): 71-96, 2010

      5 김진공, "누가 유랑하는 지구를 구할 것인가? — 영화 《유랑지구》와 중국의 ‘인류운명공동체’ 이념" 중국어문학회 (68) : 113-134, 2019

      6 蘇星, "靑島"東方影都" : 影視産業與房地産開發" (20) : 2013

      7 余馨, "與馮小剛談《不見不散》" (1) : 44-46, 1999

      8 詹慶生, "産業化十年中國電影合拍片發展備忘(2002-2012)" (2) : 39-47, 2013

      9 尹鴻, "提升中國電影競爭力 : 工業化能力⋅人才建設⋅本土化和"走出去"策略" (6) : 4-14, 2017

      10 尹鴻, "從解放生産力走向提升競爭力―産業化改革十年來的中國電影制片業" (7) : 4-10, 2012

      11 李丹陽, "工業化生産, 全鏈條配套 : 靑島東方影都助力中國電影開啓工業化新紀元―對話靑島靈山灣影視局(籌)副局長趙芳" (4) : 33-35, 2019

      12 鄒松霖, "專訪“流浪地球”導演郭帆:科幻和藝術的背後是工業化"

      13 嚴敏, "別樣“地球”征服全球"

      14 梁明, "中國電影與好萊塢工業化之差距與現狀反思" (10) : 9-15, 2019

      15 陳旭光, "中國電影的主流化與主流電影的大衆化 : 文化, 美學與限度" 29 (29): 12-21, 2012

      16 趙海城, "中國電影工業化 : 從哪里來, 到哪里去" (5) : 48-52, 2018

      17 李行, "《流浪地球》: 不那麽“硬”的硬科幻電影"

      18 유경철, "‘중국주류영화’ 논의 고찰" 한국중국현대문학학회 (82) : 187-215, 2017

      19 강내영, "‘新주선율’과 ‘汎주선율’: 중국 주선율 영화의 변천과 이데올로기 창출 연구" 한국중문학회 (49) : 219-255, 2012

      20 饒曙光, "<流浪地球>票房破46億: 高票房體現文化認同"

      21 유재기, "21세기 중국문화산업시장의 이해" (주)알에이치코리아 2019

      22 劉漢文, "2019年中國電影産業發展分析報告" (2) : 15-26, 2020

      23 張慧瑜, ""流浪地球" : 開啓中國電影的全球徐事" (3) : 21-24, 2019

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-02-15 학회명변경 영문명 : The Journal Of Chinese Language & Literature -> The Journal of Chinese Language & Literature KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.4 0.4 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.35 0.32 0.72 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼