RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사회과학 논문의 철회 지체와 인용 관성 및 학술 출판 시스템의 붕괴 현상 규명 = Investigating Retraction Lags, Citation Inertia, and the Collapse of Scholarly Publishing Systems in the Social Science

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110244947

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    With the recent rise in retraction rates in academic publishing, ‘retraction lag’—the delay between publication and retraction—and ‘citation inertia’—the continued citation of papers post-retraction—have emerged as critical issues. Furthermore, a critical issue was identified wherein the systemic collapse of publishing processes has led to instances of mass retractions. Given the nature of its subjects and methodologies, the social sciences entail high ethical and methodological complexity during data collection and research design, necessitating distinct considerations and addressing challenges different from those in the natural sciences. Accordingly, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of retracted papers within the social sciences indexed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) of the Web of Science to examine: 1) the time-to-retraction; 2) the distribution and patterns of citations for retracted papers; and 3) the status of journals and publishers with high retraction frequencies. The analysis revealed that the average time-to-retraction was 27.45 months (median: 17 months). The average number of citations per retracted paper was 15.12, with the most highly cited paper accumulating 2,228 citations. Notably, in the case of the most cited paper, 13.33% of the total citations occurred after the retraction, confirming the severity of citation inertia. Finally, observing that 42.65% of the retracted papers were published by the affiliated publishers Wiley and HINDAWI, this study highlights the critical collapse of the peer review system within “Special Issue” operations and examines the process leading to mass retractions and subsequent journal discontinuations. This study is significant in that it comprehensively assesses the impact of retracted papers on the academic community and provides foundational data for fostering a healthy and robust academic ecosystem.
    번역하기

    With the recent rise in retraction rates in academic publishing, ‘retraction lag’—the delay between publication and retraction—and ‘citation inertia’—the continued citation of papers post-retraction—have emerged as critical issues. Fur...

    With the recent rise in retraction rates in academic publishing, ‘retraction lag’—the delay between publication and retraction—and ‘citation inertia’—the continued citation of papers post-retraction—have emerged as critical issues. Furthermore, a critical issue was identified wherein the systemic collapse of publishing processes has led to instances of mass retractions. Given the nature of its subjects and methodologies, the social sciences entail high ethical and methodological complexity during data collection and research design, necessitating distinct considerations and addressing challenges different from those in the natural sciences. Accordingly, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of retracted papers within the social sciences indexed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) of the Web of Science to examine: 1) the time-to-retraction; 2) the distribution and patterns of citations for retracted papers; and 3) the status of journals and publishers with high retraction frequencies. The analysis revealed that the average time-to-retraction was 27.45 months (median: 17 months). The average number of citations per retracted paper was 15.12, with the most highly cited paper accumulating 2,228 citations. Notably, in the case of the most cited paper, 13.33% of the total citations occurred after the retraction, confirming the severity of citation inertia. Finally, observing that 42.65% of the retracted papers were published by the affiliated publishers Wiley and HINDAWI, this study highlights the critical collapse of the peer review system within “Special Issue” operations and examines the process leading to mass retractions and subsequent journal discontinuations. This study is significant in that it comprehensively assesses the impact of retracted papers on the academic community and provides foundational data for fostering a healthy and robust academic ecosystem.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼