With the recent rise in retraction rates in academic publishing, ‘retraction lag’—the delay between publication and retraction—and ‘citation inertia’—the continued citation of papers post-retraction—have emerged as critical issues. Fur...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
With the recent rise in retraction rates in academic publishing, ‘retraction lag’—the delay between publication and retraction—and ‘citation inertia’—the continued citation of papers post-retraction—have emerged as critical issues. Fur...
With the recent rise in retraction rates in academic publishing, ‘retraction lag’—the delay between publication and retraction—and ‘citation inertia’—the continued citation of papers post-retraction—have emerged as critical issues. Furthermore, a critical issue was identified wherein the systemic collapse of publishing processes has led to instances of mass retractions. Given the nature of its subjects and methodologies, the social sciences entail high ethical and methodological complexity during data collection and research design, necessitating distinct considerations and addressing challenges different from those in the natural sciences. Accordingly, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of retracted papers within the social sciences indexed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) of the Web of Science to examine: 1) the time-to-retraction; 2) the distribution and patterns of citations for retracted papers; and 3) the status of journals and publishers with high retraction frequencies. The analysis revealed that the average time-to-retraction was 27.45 months (median: 17 months). The average number of citations per retracted paper was 15.12, with the most highly cited paper accumulating 2,228 citations. Notably, in the case of the most cited paper, 13.33% of the total citations occurred after the retraction, confirming the severity of citation inertia. Finally, observing that 42.65% of the retracted papers were published by the affiliated publishers Wiley and HINDAWI, this study highlights the critical collapse of the peer review system within “Special Issue” operations and examines the process leading to mass retractions and subsequent journal discontinuations. This study is significant in that it comprehensively assesses the impact of retracted papers on the academic community and provides foundational data for fostering a healthy and robust academic ecosystem.
공공기관 자회사 기록관리 필요성에 대한 모기관 인식과 제도화 요인의 영향 분석
MODS to BIBFRAME 변환 규칙 연구: MODS 요소의 BIBFRAME 표현을 중심으로
교사의 학교도서관 활용 수업을 위한 지원과 서비스 요구 분석
AHP를 이용한 독서자료 선택요인의 상대적 중요도 탐색