RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    개인 및 조직 차원의 특성이 간호사의 혁신행동에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13566278

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전: 충남대학교 대학원, 2014

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 충남대학교 대학원 , 간호학과 간호학 전공 , 2014. 8

    • 발행연도

      2014

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      610.73 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 기타서명

      Effects of individual and organizational characteristics on the innovative behavior of nurses

    • 형태사항

      iii, 90 p.; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 박명화
      참고문헌 : p. 62-71

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting the innovative behavior of nurses and to develop interventions for nurses through understanding of the paths and effects between related variables.
    A hypothetical model was constructed on the basis of Scott & Bruce’s innovative behavior model(1994), Blakeney’s innovation-
    creativity-environment model(2009), and a review of the literature on innovative behavior.
    The exogenous variables of the hypothetical model were self-leadership, knowledge sharing of individuals, and knowledge sharing of organizations. The endogenous variables of the hypothetical model were creative self-efficacy, innovative organization culture, and individual innovative behavior.
    Data were collected between March 25 and April 6, 2014. Data were collected using a self-report survey. The subjects were nurses working at the general hospital with 300 or more hospital beds. Of the 425 distributed questionnaires, 347 without any missing data were used for the analysis.
    To examine individual innovative behavior, a translated version of the 14-item questionnaire developed by Kleysen & Street(2001) was used. To examine creative self-efficacy, a translated version of the 8-item questionnaire developed by Carmeli & Schaubroeck(2007) was used. To assess self-leadership, the 18-item questionnaire developed by Manz (1983) and modified by Kim(2003) and Cho(2003) was used. To examine knowledge sharing of individual, a modified version of the developed by Bae(2005) was used. To examine knowledge sharing of organization and knowledge sharing of organization, this study used respectively the 5-item and 9-item questionnaire developed by Bae (2005). To investigate innovative organization culture, the 5-item questionnaire selected by Kwon(2011) based on studies by Cameron and Quinn(1999), and Kim and Lee(1997) was used. The Cronbach’s α scores for these scales ranged from .68 to .95. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and path analysis, using SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 21.0.
    The study findings were as follows:
    1. The model showed a much better fit(GFI = 1.000, AGFI = .999, RMR = .046, RMSEA ≤ .001) with the empirical data than the hypothetical model.
    2. The variables directly affecting creative self-efficacy were self-leadership(β = .522, p < .05) and knowledge sharing of individual(β = .126, p < .05). These variables explained 37.5% creative self-efficacy.
    3. The variables directly affecting innovative organization culture were knowledge sharing of organization(β = .419, p < .05) and self-leadership (β = .113, p < .05). These variables explained 24.4% of innovative organization culture.
    4. The variables directly affecting individual innovative behavior were knowledge of individual(β = .406, p < .05), self-leadership(β = .325, p < .05), creative self-efficacy(β = .251, p < .05), and innovative organization culture(β = .141, p < .05). These variables explained 51.6% of individual innovative behavior.
    In conclusion, self-leadership, creative self-efficacy, and knowledge sharing of individual were shown to have a direct effect on individual innovative behavior, necessitating the development of various nursing interventions. Thus, in order to promote the innovative behavior of nurses, an knowledge sharing of organization must be established through the distribution of innovative organization culture.
    The innovative behavior of nurses and related factors were investigated, and the causal relationships among as well as effects of these variables were analyzed. The results of this study may contribute to the effective management of the individual and organization through the innovative behavior of nurses, and ultimately, provide directions for nursing interventions as well as qualified nursing for the patient.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting the innovative behavior of nurses and to develop interventions for nurses through understanding of the paths and effects between related variables. A hypothetical model was constructed on ...

    The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting the innovative behavior of nurses and to develop interventions for nurses through understanding of the paths and effects between related variables.
    A hypothetical model was constructed on the basis of Scott & Bruce’s innovative behavior model(1994), Blakeney’s innovation-
    creativity-environment model(2009), and a review of the literature on innovative behavior.
    The exogenous variables of the hypothetical model were self-leadership, knowledge sharing of individuals, and knowledge sharing of organizations. The endogenous variables of the hypothetical model were creative self-efficacy, innovative organization culture, and individual innovative behavior.
    Data were collected between March 25 and April 6, 2014. Data were collected using a self-report survey. The subjects were nurses working at the general hospital with 300 or more hospital beds. Of the 425 distributed questionnaires, 347 without any missing data were used for the analysis.
    To examine individual innovative behavior, a translated version of the 14-item questionnaire developed by Kleysen & Street(2001) was used. To examine creative self-efficacy, a translated version of the 8-item questionnaire developed by Carmeli & Schaubroeck(2007) was used. To assess self-leadership, the 18-item questionnaire developed by Manz (1983) and modified by Kim(2003) and Cho(2003) was used. To examine knowledge sharing of individual, a modified version of the developed by Bae(2005) was used. To examine knowledge sharing of organization and knowledge sharing of organization, this study used respectively the 5-item and 9-item questionnaire developed by Bae (2005). To investigate innovative organization culture, the 5-item questionnaire selected by Kwon(2011) based on studies by Cameron and Quinn(1999), and Kim and Lee(1997) was used. The Cronbach’s α scores for these scales ranged from .68 to .95. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and path analysis, using SPSS 21.0 and AMOS 21.0.
    The study findings were as follows:
    1. The model showed a much better fit(GFI = 1.000, AGFI = .999, RMR = .046, RMSEA ≤ .001) with the empirical data than the hypothetical model.
    2. The variables directly affecting creative self-efficacy were self-leadership(β = .522, p < .05) and knowledge sharing of individual(β = .126, p < .05). These variables explained 37.5% creative self-efficacy.
    3. The variables directly affecting innovative organization culture were knowledge sharing of organization(β = .419, p < .05) and self-leadership (β = .113, p < .05). These variables explained 24.4% of innovative organization culture.
    4. The variables directly affecting individual innovative behavior were knowledge of individual(β = .406, p < .05), self-leadership(β = .325, p < .05), creative self-efficacy(β = .251, p < .05), and innovative organization culture(β = .141, p < .05). These variables explained 51.6% of individual innovative behavior.
    In conclusion, self-leadership, creative self-efficacy, and knowledge sharing of individual were shown to have a direct effect on individual innovative behavior, necessitating the development of various nursing interventions. Thus, in order to promote the innovative behavior of nurses, an knowledge sharing of organization must be established through the distribution of innovative organization culture.
    The innovative behavior of nurses and related factors were investigated, and the causal relationships among as well as effects of these variables were analyzed. The results of this study may contribute to the effective management of the individual and organization through the innovative behavior of nurses, and ultimately, provide directions for nursing interventions as well as qualified nursing for the patient.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 5
    • 3. 용어의 정의 6
    • 1) 개인의 혁신행동 6
    • I. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 5
    • 3. 용어의 정의 6
    • 1) 개인의 혁신행동 6
    • 2) 셀프리더십 6
    • 3) 개인차원의 지식공유 6
    • 4) 창조적 자기효능감 7
    • 5) 조직차원의 지식공유 7
    • 6) 혁신적 조직문화 7
    • II. 문 헌 고 찰 8
    • 1. 개인의 혁신행동 8
    • 2. 셀프리더십 11
    • 3. 창조적 자기효능감 13
    • 4. 지식공유 14
    • 5. 혁신적 조직문화 17
    • III. 연구의 개념적 기틀 20
    • 1. 개념적 기틀 20
    • 2. 가설적 모형 25
    • 3. 연구 가설 26
    • IV. 연구방법 28
    • 1. 연구 설계 28
    • 2. 연구 대상 28
    • 3. 연구 도구 28
    • 4. 윤리적 고려 31
    • 5. 자료수집 방법 32
    • 6. 자료분석 방법 33
    • V. 연구결과 35
    • 1. 대상자의 일반적 특성 35
    • 2. 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 개인의 혁신행동 35
    • 3. 연구변수의 기술통계 38
    • 4. 연구변수의 상관관계 40
    • 5. 가설적 모형의 경로분석 41
    • 1) 가설적 경로모형의 적합도 41
    • 2) 가설적 경로모형의 경로계수 및 경로도해 43
    • 3) 가설적 경로모형의 직접효과, 간접효과 및 총효과 46
    • 6. 연구가설 검증 49
    • VI. 논의 51
    • VII. 결론 및 제언 59
    • 1. 결론 59
    • 2. 제언 61
    • 참고문헌 62
    • 부록 72
    • 부록 1. 설문지 72
    • 부록 2. 생명윤리심의 결과통지서 85
    • 영문초록 86
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼