RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국의 교원 질 관리체제에 관한 사례분석 및 시사점

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to analyze American teacher quality management system and provide it’s implications. For this, the study analyzed the main traits of American teacher policy, Pennsylvania State University’s teacher cultivation system, Pennsylvania State’s teacher certification, selection, and recruit system, the master teacher system of New Jersey and New York State. The main results are as the followings. First, American teacher policy is variously operated by state government and school district based on variety and autonomy. Second, for teacher cultivation in American teacher policy, the evaluation on the teacher cultivation program of teacher cultivation institute(mainly university) is strictly administrated. Third, for teacher certification, various tests for gaining teacher certificate are administered and standardized tests are used for the tests. Fourth, for teacher selection and recruit, there is no special test for selection and teacher recruit is done by contract. Fifth, for quality management using excellent teacher, America is administering master teacher that is similar with master teacher system in Korea. Finally, the innovation of teacher cultivation institute by introducing Every Student Succeeds Act(ESSA) is anticipated. Based on these results, the implications for Korean teacher policy were provided.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to analyze American teacher quality management system and provide it’s implications. For this, the study analyzed the main traits of American teacher policy, Pennsylvania State University’s teacher cultivation system, ...

    The purpose of the study was to analyze American teacher quality management system and provide it’s implications. For this, the study analyzed the main traits of American teacher policy, Pennsylvania State University’s teacher cultivation system, Pennsylvania State’s teacher certification, selection, and recruit system, the master teacher system of New Jersey and New York State. The main results are as the followings. First, American teacher policy is variously operated by state government and school district based on variety and autonomy. Second, for teacher cultivation in American teacher policy, the evaluation on the teacher cultivation program of teacher cultivation institute(mainly university) is strictly administrated. Third, for teacher certification, various tests for gaining teacher certificate are administered and standardized tests are used for the tests. Fourth, for teacher selection and recruit, there is no special test for selection and teacher recruit is done by contract. Fifth, for quality management using excellent teacher, America is administering master teacher that is similar with master teacher system in Korea. Finally, the innovation of teacher cultivation institute by introducing Every Student Succeeds Act(ESSA) is anticipated. Based on these results, the implications for Korean teacher policy were provided.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정일환, "비교교육학 : 이론과 실제" 교육과학사 2012

    2 윤종건, "미국의 교육제도" 2 : 5-34, 1996

    3 정일환, "미국 교육 정치학" 교육과학사 2016

    4 정일환, "교사교육 평가 인정제도 도입 방안 연구" 한국교육개발원 1991

    5 "https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/research/selectExternalForm.do"

    6 "http://www.psu.edu/"

    7 "http://www.phila.k12.pa.us/"

    8 "http://ed.psu.edu/"

    9 한국교육개발원, "[미국] 교사양성기관 개혁을 촉진하는 ‘모든 학생의 성공법’, 교육동향" 한국교육개발원 2016

    10 Spring, J., "The politics of American education" Routledge 2011

    1 정일환, "비교교육학 : 이론과 실제" 교육과학사 2012

    2 윤종건, "미국의 교육제도" 2 : 5-34, 1996

    3 정일환, "미국 교육 정치학" 교육과학사 2016

    4 정일환, "교사교육 평가 인정제도 도입 방안 연구" 한국교육개발원 1991

    5 "https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/research/selectExternalForm.do"

    6 "http://www.psu.edu/"

    7 "http://www.phila.k12.pa.us/"

    8 "http://ed.psu.edu/"

    9 한국교육개발원, "[미국] 교사양성기관 개혁을 촉진하는 ‘모든 학생의 성공법’, 교육동향" 한국교육개발원 2016

    10 Spring, J., "The politics of American education" Routledge 2011

    11 National Center for Education Statistics, "The Condition of Education 2008(vol. 1)" U. S. Government Printing Office 2008

    12 OECD, "Teachers Matter : Attracting, Developing, and Retaining Effective Teachers" OECD 2005

    13 Tryneski, J., "Requirements for Certification of Teachers, Counselors, Librarians, Administrators for Elementary and Secondary Schools" University of Chicago Press 1990

    14 Shulman, L. S., "Knowledge and Teaching : Foundations of the New Reform" 57 (57): 1-22, 1987

    15 Pugach, M. C., "Advances in Teacher Education 1" Ablex 145-169, 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.79 0.79 0.98
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.91 0.94 1.28 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼