RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    수수료 요율결정을 위한 ABC 적용에 관한 연구 = A Study on Utilizing ABC in Public Service Pricing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104620836

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Compared to the general tax revenues, user fees and charges are more efficient means of financing local governments by coinciding the consumers (beneficiaries) and the payers of the public services. However, the amount of the revenue is less than two percent of the total revenue and the level of user fees compared to the cost is differed by regions, agencies, and service types. It is largely due to the fact that most of the service fees are not repriced reflecting inflation and economic growth on a regular basis. It is not difficult to find the user fees which have not been recalculated for more than ten years. This study purports to improve the pricing mechanism of public services by comparing the traditional pricing method in the public sector and the activity-based costing(ABC). It also reviews the possibility and ways of adopting the latter which are widely adopted by the private entities to the public sector. First, it suggests the ways of allocating various costs, including labor cost, to the corresponding component activities. Second, it also emphasizes a standard costing approach for similar and uniform services which are being provided by many local governments. This will reduce expenses of cost accounting and rate disparity among local governments. Third, ABC based pricing will also help to restructure and reinvent the local governments by providing theoretical grounds for expanding the services with high customer demand/satisfaction while reducing with low customer demand/satisfaction.
    번역하기

    Compared to the general tax revenues, user fees and charges are more efficient means of financing local governments by coinciding the consumers (beneficiaries) and the payers of the public services. However, the amount of the revenue is less than two ...

    Compared to the general tax revenues, user fees and charges are more efficient means of financing local governments by coinciding the consumers (beneficiaries) and the payers of the public services. However, the amount of the revenue is less than two percent of the total revenue and the level of user fees compared to the cost is differed by regions, agencies, and service types. It is largely due to the fact that most of the service fees are not repriced reflecting inflation and economic growth on a regular basis. It is not difficult to find the user fees which have not been recalculated for more than ten years. This study purports to improve the pricing mechanism of public services by comparing the traditional pricing method in the public sector and the activity-based costing(ABC). It also reviews the possibility and ways of adopting the latter which are widely adopted by the private entities to the public sector. First, it suggests the ways of allocating various costs, including labor cost, to the corresponding component activities. Second, it also emphasizes a standard costing approach for similar and uniform services which are being provided by many local governments. This will reduce expenses of cost accounting and rate disparity among local governments. Third, ABC based pricing will also help to restructure and reinvent the local governments by providing theoretical grounds for expanding the services with high customer demand/satisfaction while reducing with low customer demand/satisfaction.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.89 0.89 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.87 1.024 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼