RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    강원 동해안 관광객의 외식점포 선택속성의 중요도 분석 = Analyzing the Importance of Tourists' Restaurant Choice Attributes in Tourism Provinces

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103851520

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the absolute and relative importance of tourists' choice attributes of restaurants and (2) to compare tourists' choice patterns with the prediction of restaurant operators in the tourism provinces of Gangwon-do. Empirical data for this study were collected from the 77 tourists and 66 restaurants operators. The attributes and attribute levels for the hypothetical profiles were decided from a focus group interview and 15 profiles were selected from fractional factorial designs. The SPSS/WIN 12.0 conjoint procedure was used to calculate the utility scores and simulate the profiles. According to the analysis on the relative importance of tourists' choice attributes of restaurants, food taste was the most important attribute(36.9%), followed by facility cleanliness(28.5%), dishes cleanliness(24.5%), price(19.3%) and service(18.3%). The tourists?ratings of the importance of the individual attributes differed from the ranking of the relative importance of the same attributes as derived from the conjoint analysis. The operators rated dishes cleanliness(27.6%) as also important, followed by food taste(27.7%), in choosing a restaurant. Tourists' preference and operators' prediction of hypothetical profiles showed significant difference in L(p < .05), O(p < .01), M(p < .05), and H(p < .01) restaurants. Operators who want to differentiate themselves from their competitors should make decisions based on an increased understanding of tourists' restaurant choice decision process and measure the latent needs of tourists in the tourism provinces.
    번역하기

    The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the absolute and relative importance of tourists' choice attributes of restaurants and (2) to compare tourists' choice patterns with the prediction of restaurant operators in the tourism provinces of Gang...

    The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the absolute and relative importance of tourists' choice attributes of restaurants and (2) to compare tourists' choice patterns with the prediction of restaurant operators in the tourism provinces of Gangwon-do. Empirical data for this study were collected from the 77 tourists and 66 restaurants operators. The attributes and attribute levels for the hypothetical profiles were decided from a focus group interview and 15 profiles were selected from fractional factorial designs. The SPSS/WIN 12.0 conjoint procedure was used to calculate the utility scores and simulate the profiles. According to the analysis on the relative importance of tourists' choice attributes of restaurants, food taste was the most important attribute(36.9%), followed by facility cleanliness(28.5%), dishes cleanliness(24.5%), price(19.3%) and service(18.3%). The tourists?ratings of the importance of the individual attributes differed from the ranking of the relative importance of the same attributes as derived from the conjoint analysis. The operators rated dishes cleanliness(27.6%) as also important, followed by food taste(27.7%), in choosing a restaurant. Tourists' preference and operators' prediction of hypothetical profiles showed significant difference in L(p < .05), O(p < .01), M(p < .05), and H(p < .01) restaurants. Operators who want to differentiate themselves from their competitors should make decisions based on an increased understanding of tourists' restaurant choice decision process and measure the latent needs of tourists in the tourism provinces.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안성식, "컨조인트분석을 이용한 패밀리 레스토랑의 성공요인에 관한 연구" 한국외식경영학회 8 (8): 87-104, 2005

    2 채인숙, "컨조인트 분석을 통한 피자브랜드 선택 속성의 중요도 분석" 대한지역사회영양학회 7 (7): 6-360, 2002

    3 강종헌, "순천시 음식서비스에 대한 관광객 선호도의 컨조인트 평가" 한국식품조리과학회 19 (19): 308-317, 2003

    4 채인숙, "관광지역 외식점포의 운영실태 및 관광객의 충성도 분석 - 동해시를 중심으로 -" 한국식생활문화학회 21 (21): 388-395, 2006

    5 함석종, "관광수입증대를 위한 관광지의 식음료상품 개 선방안 -설악 및 속초지역을 중심으로-" 20 (20): 198-220, 1996

    6 NRA, "Travel & tourism"

    7 Sweeny, J. C., "The effect of cues on service quality expectation and service selection in a restaurant setting" 6 (6): 15-22, 1992

    8 June, L. P., "Service attributes and situational effects on customer preference for restaurant dining" 20-27, 1987

    9 채서일, "SPSS WIN을 이용한 통계분석" 학현사 2004

    10 Lewis, B. R., "Quality in the service sector" 71 (71): 4-13, 1989

    1 안성식, "컨조인트분석을 이용한 패밀리 레스토랑의 성공요인에 관한 연구" 한국외식경영학회 8 (8): 87-104, 2005

    2 채인숙, "컨조인트 분석을 통한 피자브랜드 선택 속성의 중요도 분석" 대한지역사회영양학회 7 (7): 6-360, 2002

    3 강종헌, "순천시 음식서비스에 대한 관광객 선호도의 컨조인트 평가" 한국식품조리과학회 19 (19): 308-317, 2003

    4 채인숙, "관광지역 외식점포의 운영실태 및 관광객의 충성도 분석 - 동해시를 중심으로 -" 한국식생활문화학회 21 (21): 388-395, 2006

    5 함석종, "관광수입증대를 위한 관광지의 식음료상품 개 선방안 -설악 및 속초지역을 중심으로-" 20 (20): 198-220, 1996

    6 NRA, "Travel & tourism"

    7 Sweeny, J. C., "The effect of cues on service quality expectation and service selection in a restaurant setting" 6 (6): 15-22, 1992

    8 June, L. P., "Service attributes and situational effects on customer preference for restaurant dining" 20-27, 1987

    9 채서일, "SPSS WIN을 이용한 통계분석" 학현사 2004

    10 Lewis, B. R., "Quality in the service sector" 71 (71): 4-13, 1989

    11 Mitchell, V. M., "Primary and secondary store-loyal customer perceptions of grocery retailers" 100 (100): 312-319, 1992

    12 Koo, L. C., "Preferential segmentation of restaurant attributes through conjoint analysis" 11 (11): 242-250, 1999

    13 Levy, D. S., "Modem marketing research techniques and the property professional" 13 : 33-40, 1995

    14 Kara, A., "Marketing strategies for fast-food restaurants: a customer view" 99 (99): 318-324, 1997

    15 Kotler, P., "Marketing for hospitality and tourism" Prentice Hall 1999

    16 Bowen, J. T., "Market segmentation in hospitality research: no longer a sequential process" 10 (10): 289-296, 1998

    17 Verma, R., "Managing service operations based on customer preferences" 19 (19): 891-908, 1999

    18 Toombs, K., "How to redesign your organization to match customer needs" 5 (5): 52-56, 1995

    19 Tse, A. C. B., "How much more are consumers willing to pay for a higher level of service? A preliminary survey" 15 (15): 11-17, 2001

    20 Gil, J. M., "Consumer preference for wine attributes; a conjoint approach" 99 (99): 3-11, 1997

    21 Matsatsinis, N. F., "Brand choice model selection based on consumers’ multi-criteria preferences and experts’ knowledge" 27 : 678-707, 2000

    22 Sirohi, N., "A model old consumer perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer" 74 (74): 223-245, 1998

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-11 통합 KCI등재
    2013-06-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한가정학회지 -> Family and Environment Research
    외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association -> Family and Environment Research
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-11-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.76 0.76 0.96
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.02 1.04 1.279 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼