RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      과학과 인지적 영역의 평가에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Education of Cognitive Domains in Science Lessons

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75007059

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to find out students' cognitve abilities in science lessons. Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives' Klopfer's Specification for Science Education, and Piaget's cognitive Development Theory were reviewed to build the e...

      The purpose of this study is to find out students' cognitve abilities in science lessons. Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives' Klopfer's Specification for Science Education, and Piaget's cognitive Development Theory were reviewed to build the evaluating tool. The contents of the constructed tool includes 33 percents' experimental items, and the rest were non-experimental. In the evaluating methods three types of questioning were adopted : multiple choice(79%), short answer test(l5%). and essay typy(6%).
      Data were collected from 359 students' who are attending middle schools in two cities in Cheju-do. To find out the statistical facts, students' scores were calculated into mean, standard deviation and percentile.
      The analysis of the data showed the following results :
      The average score of students' scientific thinking ability is around 58.3 which stands for lower state of thinking ability than expected.
      Students got higher scores in questions on the experimental-observational contents of learning. It seems that students understand this content of learning more easily than the others.
      However, students got very lower scores in the contents of learning which include such higher mental-processes as secondary, synthetic functions. It suggests that teachers ought to pay more attention to this content of learning to stimulate students higher mental ability.
      Score distribution and higher mental function showed positive relationship.
      The study has made certain that through the evaluating frame of cognitive domains we can assess students ability on the experimental areas of learning except the manual skills, even if paper tests are practiced.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Summary = 7
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 8
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 9
      • A. Bloom의 교육목표 분류학 = 9
      • B. Klopfer의 과학교육목표 분류체계 = 11
      • Summary = 7
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 8
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 9
      • A. Bloom의 교육목표 분류학 = 9
      • B. Klopfer의 과학교육목표 분류체계 = 11
      • C. 심리학적 배경 = 14
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 내용 = 15
      • A. Bloom의 분류학에 비춰본 Klopfer의 분류체계 = 15
      • B. 평가지의 내용 = 16
      • C. 적용대상 = 19
      • Ⅳ. 결론 = 22
      • <참고문헌> = 23
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼