RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Effect of Active Surgical Co-Management by Medical Hospitalists in Urology Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108721041

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpa tient care.
      Materials and Methods: Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satis faction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards.
      Results: We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) re quired co-management for a significantly shorter duration (p=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (p=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (p=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (p=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores.
      Conclusion: Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpa tient care. Materials and Methods: Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical cen...

      Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpa tient care.
      Materials and Methods: Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satis faction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards.
      Results: We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) re quired co-management for a significantly shorter duration (p=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (p=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (p=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (p=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores.
      Conclusion: Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장성인, "한국형 입원전담전문의 제도의 도입과 시범사업 평가를 통한 발전방향" 대한의사협회 62 (62): 558-563, 2019

      2 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, "World population ageing 2020 highlights: living arrangements of older persons"

      3 Klein LE, "The preoperative consultation. Response to internists’ recommendations" 143 : 743-744, 1983

      4 Beresford L, "The comanagement conundrum" The Hospitalist: Society of Hospital Medicine 2011

      5 Goldman L, "Ten commandments for effective consultations" 143 : 1753-1755, 1983

      6 Rohatgi N, "Surgical comanagement by hospitalists improves patient outcomes : a propensity score analysis" 264 : 275-282, 2016

      7 Tanriover MD, "Should every adult patient in the hospital have an internist?" 131 : 283-284, 2013

      8 Salerno SM, "Principles of effective consultation : an update for the 21st-century consultant" 167 : 271-275, 2007

      9 Detsky AS, "Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery" 1 : 211-219, 1986

      10 Boddaert J, "Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture" 9 : e83795-, 2014

      1 장성인, "한국형 입원전담전문의 제도의 도입과 시범사업 평가를 통한 발전방향" 대한의사협회 62 (62): 558-563, 2019

      2 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, "World population ageing 2020 highlights: living arrangements of older persons"

      3 Klein LE, "The preoperative consultation. Response to internists’ recommendations" 143 : 743-744, 1983

      4 Beresford L, "The comanagement conundrum" The Hospitalist: Society of Hospital Medicine 2011

      5 Goldman L, "Ten commandments for effective consultations" 143 : 1753-1755, 1983

      6 Rohatgi N, "Surgical comanagement by hospitalists improves patient outcomes : a propensity score analysis" 264 : 275-282, 2016

      7 Tanriover MD, "Should every adult patient in the hospital have an internist?" 131 : 283-284, 2013

      8 Salerno SM, "Principles of effective consultation : an update for the 21st-century consultant" 167 : 271-275, 2007

      9 Detsky AS, "Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery" 1 : 211-219, 1986

      10 Boddaert J, "Postoperative admission to a dedicated geriatric unit decreases mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture" 9 : e83795-, 2014

      11 Simon TD, "Pediatric hospitalist comanagement of spinal fusion surgery patients" 2 : 23-30, 2007

      12 Kammerlander C, "Ortho-geriatric service--a literature review comparing different models" 21 (21): S637-S646, 2010

      13 Kim SW, "Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk" 149 : 633-640, 2014

      14 Pearse RM, "Mortality after surgery in Europe : a 7 day cohort study" 380 : 1059-1065, 2012

      15 Siegal EM, "Just because you can, doesn’t mean that you should : a call for the rational application of hospitalist comanagement" 3 : 398-402, 2008

      16 Eagle KA, "Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery" 93 : 1278-1317, 1996

      17 American College of Physicians, "Guidelines for assessing and managing the perioperative risk from coronary artery disease associated with major noncardiac surgery" 127 : 309-312, 1997

      18 Letica-Kriegel AS, "Feasibility of a geriatric comanagement(GERICO)pilot program for patients 75 and older undergoing radical cystectomy" 48 : 1427-1432, 2022

      19 Shaw M, "Evaluation of internal medicine physician or multidisciplinary team comanagement of surgical patients and clinical outcomes : a systematic review and metaanalysis" 3 : e204088-, 2020

      20 Montero Ruiz E, "Effect of comanagement with internal medicine on hospital stay of patients admitted to the service of otolaryngology" 66 : 264-268, 2015

      21 Chae W, "Development and evolution of hospital medicine in Korea" 16 : 247-250, 2021

      22 Della Rocca GJ, "Comanagement of geriatric patients with hip fractures : a retrospective, controlled, cohort study" 4 : 10-15, 2013

      23 Detsky AS, "Cardiac assessment for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. A multifactorial clinical risk index" 146 : 2131-2134, 1986

      24 Stier G, "Anesthesiologists as perioperative hospitalists and outcomes in patients undergoing major urologic surgery: a historical prospective, comparative effectiveness study" 7 : 13-, 2018

      25 정윤빈 ; Eun-Joo Jung ; 이강영, "A surgical hospitalist system in Korea: a preliminary study of the effects on hospital costs and postoperative outcomes" 대한외과학회 100 (100): 298-304, 2021

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼