RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Economic Consequences of Accounting Enforcement Actions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104296054

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of financial misreporting investigated and disclosed by the FSS. In this essay, we examine whether the enforcement actions have economic consequences on the firm which is caught by regulators on committing GAAP violations. This research topic is motivated by a need to understand whether and how the enforcement actions by the FSS affect the firm economically and capital market both in the long-term and by firm’s listing status. To investigate these issues, we use various variables to proxy for economic consequences and add some debt-related variables. We also classify the sample firm-years into before and after years relative to violation year and detection year to examine the effects of enforcement actions in the long term. In addition, we separate the listed companies into two groups based on exchange listing, the firms listed in Korea Stock Exchange (hereafter, KSE) and the firms listed in the Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (hereafter, KSQ) because the two groups are supposed to be different in terms of various firm characteristics such as size,profitability, and ownership structure. Empirical findings show that the effects of enforcement actions are different across listing status. In particular, KSQ-listed firms show more sensitive reactions to the enforcement actions than KSE-listed firms in most of analyses (short-term stock market reactions, firm performance, working capital, leverage, investment, discretionary accruals,forecast dispersion, bond maturity, and credit rating). In addition, debt market participants such as bondholders and rating agencies react to enforcement actions differently from stock market analyst and across listing status of firm. Overall, these findings suggest that distinguishing KSQ-listed firms from KSE-listed firms is important to understand the motivations for GAAP violations and the consequences of enforcement actions.
    번역하기

    This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of financial misreporting investigated and disclosed by the FSS. In this essay, we examine whether the enforcement actions have economic consequences on the firm which is caught by regulators on committing ...

    This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of financial misreporting investigated and disclosed by the FSS. In this essay, we examine whether the enforcement actions have economic consequences on the firm which is caught by regulators on committing GAAP violations. This research topic is motivated by a need to understand whether and how the enforcement actions by the FSS affect the firm economically and capital market both in the long-term and by firm’s listing status. To investigate these issues, we use various variables to proxy for economic consequences and add some debt-related variables. We also classify the sample firm-years into before and after years relative to violation year and detection year to examine the effects of enforcement actions in the long term. In addition, we separate the listed companies into two groups based on exchange listing, the firms listed in Korea Stock Exchange (hereafter, KSE) and the firms listed in the Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (hereafter, KSQ) because the two groups are supposed to be different in terms of various firm characteristics such as size,profitability, and ownership structure. Empirical findings show that the effects of enforcement actions are different across listing status. In particular, KSQ-listed firms show more sensitive reactions to the enforcement actions than KSE-listed firms in most of analyses (short-term stock market reactions, firm performance, working capital, leverage, investment, discretionary accruals,forecast dispersion, bond maturity, and credit rating). In addition, debt market participants such as bondholders and rating agencies react to enforcement actions differently from stock market analyst and across listing status of firm. Overall, these findings suggest that distinguishing KSQ-listed firms from KSE-listed firms is important to understand the motivations for GAAP violations and the consequences of enforcement actions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 노준화, "회계실패사례분석 및 회계실패방지를 위한 개선방안: 경영환경, 회계환경, 간사환경 및 감리환경을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 155-180, 2004

    2 최관, "회계부정기업의 특성에 관한 연구: 감리지적기업을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 211-243, 2003

    3 이은철, "회계부정과 장기시장반응" 한국공인회계사회 (50) : 207-240, 2009

    4 김문철, "분식회계기업의 적발" 한국회계학회 16 (16): 1-34, 2007

    5 김성환, "감리지적기업의 감리전후 이익조정과 시장반응에 관한 연구" 한국공인회계사회 (46) : 309-339, 2007

    6 Ahmed,A.S, "The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs" 77 (77): 867-890, 2002

    7 Park,J, "The prediction of detection in audit review using the characteristics of auditee and auditor" 24 (24): 1-32, 1999

    8 Francis,J, "The market pricing of accrual quality" 39 (39): 295-327, 2005

    9 Burns,N, "The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting" 79 (79): 35-67, 2006

    10 Feroz,E.H, "The financial and market effects of the SEC’s accounting and auditing enforcement releases" (29) : 107-142, 1991

    1 노준화, "회계실패사례분석 및 회계실패방지를 위한 개선방안: 경영환경, 회계환경, 간사환경 및 감리환경을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 155-180, 2004

    2 최관, "회계부정기업의 특성에 관한 연구: 감리지적기업을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 211-243, 2003

    3 이은철, "회계부정과 장기시장반응" 한국공인회계사회 (50) : 207-240, 2009

    4 김문철, "분식회계기업의 적발" 한국회계학회 16 (16): 1-34, 2007

    5 김성환, "감리지적기업의 감리전후 이익조정과 시장반응에 관한 연구" 한국공인회계사회 (46) : 309-339, 2007

    6 Ahmed,A.S, "The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs" 77 (77): 867-890, 2002

    7 Park,J, "The prediction of detection in audit review using the characteristics of auditee and auditor" 24 (24): 1-32, 1999

    8 Francis,J, "The market pricing of accrual quality" 39 (39): 295-327, 2005

    9 Burns,N, "The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting" 79 (79): 35-67, 2006

    10 Feroz,E.H, "The financial and market effects of the SEC’s accounting and auditing enforcement releases" (29) : 107-142, 1991

    11 Ashbaugh-Skaife,H, "The effects of corporate governance on firms credit ratings" 42 (42): 203-243, 2006

    12 Hribar,P, "The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital" 9 (9): 337-356, 2004

    13 Anderson,K.,and T.Yohn, "The effect of 10K restatements on firm value, information asymmetries, and investors’ reliance on earnings" Georgetown University 2002

    14 Kedia,S, "The economics of fraudulent account" 22 (22): 2169-2199, 2007

    15 Beneish,M.D, "The detection of earnings manipulation" Duke University, Durham, NC 1994

    16 Sohn,S, "The current state of audit review and the information effect" 23 (23): 107-131, 1998

    17 Farber,D.B, "Restoring trust after fraud:Does corporate governance matter" 80 (80): 539-561, 2005

    18 McNichols,M, "Research design issues in earnings management studies" 19 (19): 313-345, 2000

    19 Kothari,S.P, "Performance matched discretionary accrual measures" 39 (39): 163-197, 2005

    20 Kasznik,R, "On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management" 37 (37): 57-82, 1999

    21 Agrawal,A, "Management turnover and governance changes following the revelation of fraud" (42) : 309-342, 1999

    22 Ball,R, "Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism" 13 (13): 168-205, 2008

    23 Beneish,M.D, "Incentives and penalties related to earnings mover" (16) : 271-309, 1999

    24 Bonner,S.E, "Fraud type and auditor litigation:An analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases" 73 (73): 503-532, 1998

    25 Cheng,Q, "Equity incentives and earnings management" 80 (80): 441-476, 2005

    26 Bhojraj,S, "Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields:The role of institutional investors and outside directors" 76 (76): 455-475, 2003

    27 Wu,M, "Earnings restatements:A capital market perspective" New York University 2002

    28 Chen,Q, "Earnings restatements, change in CEO compensation, and firm performance" 83 (83): 1217-1250, 2008

    29 Dechow,P.M, "Earnings management:Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators" 14 (14): 235-250, 2000

    30 Jones,J.J, "Earnings management during import relief investigations" 29 (29): 193-228, 1991

    31 Teoh, S. H, "Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings" 50 (50): 63-99, 1998

    32 Teoh, S. H, "Earnings management and the long-term market performance of initial public offerings" 53 (53): 1935-1974, 1998

    33 Lo,K, "Earnings management and earnings quality" 45 (45): 350-357, 2008

    34 McNochols,M.F, "Does earnings management affect firms’ investment decisions" 83 (83): 1571-1603, 2008

    35 Mansi,S.A, "Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from bond market" 42 (42): 755-793, 2004

    36 Palmrose,Z-V, "Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements" 37 (37): 59-89, 2004

    37 Dechow,P.M, "Detecting earnings management" 70 (70): 193-225, 1995

    38 Beneish,M.D, "Detecting GAAP violation:Implications for assessing earnings management among firms with extreme financial performance" (16) : 271-309, 1997

    39 Sweeney,A.P, "Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses" 17 (17): 281-308, 1994

    40 DeFond,M.L, "Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals" 17 (17): 145-176, 1994

    41 Graham,J.R, "Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting" 89 (89): 44-61, 2008

    42 Schipper,K, "Commentary on earnings management" 3 (3): 91-102, 1989

    43 Dechow,P.M, "Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation:An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC" 13 (13): 1-36, 1996

    44 Pittman,J.A, "Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms" 37 (37): 113-136, 2004

    45 Beasley,M.S, "An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud" 71 (71): 443-465, 1996

    46 Choi,K, "An empirical analysis of the earnings manipulation by the firms detected in audit review" 23 (23): 133-161, 1998

    47 Wilson,W.M, "An empirical analysis of the decline in the information content of earnings following restatements" 83 (83): 519-548, 2008

    48 Jensen,M, "Agency costs of overvalued equity" (34) : 5-19, 2005

    49 Healy,P.M, "A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting" 13 (13): 365-383, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼