The primary purpose of this paper is to suggest the appropriate and achievable way of learning of English reading for early readers. Learning to read is not something that starts with memorizing the alphabet or phoneme. Traditional phonics, with ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The primary purpose of this paper is to suggest the appropriate and achievable way of learning of English reading for early readers. Learning to read is not something that starts with memorizing the alphabet or phoneme. Traditional phonics, with ...
The primary purpose of this paper is to suggest the appropriate and achievable way of learning of English reading for early readers.
Learning to read is not something that starts with memorizing the alphabet or phoneme. Traditional phonics, with its focus on individual phoneme, doesn't give children an accessible entry route into reading.
Children's experience of reading needs to begin with whole texts, being read for meaning. One way to do this is through shared reading with predictable, engaging stories. This way differs from the traditional part-to-whole approach in that it teaches parts of the words after a story has been read to, with and by the children rather than before the story is read by the children. This method is called whole-to-part reading.
Whole-to-part phonics instruction differs from traditional phonics in that it teaches letter-onset and letter-rime correspondences rather than letter-phoneme correspondences.
More importantly, this way emphasizes the importance of the invisible factors which affect the reading process such as the children's enjoyment, confidence, schema (background knowledge), familiar context and making analogies.
Whole-to-part approach to reading is psycholinguistically appropriate and meets children's needs. It gives us a very useful framework for early reading learning, and the first step to begin with it is to select the age-appropriate predictable story books.
Korean EFL Learner's Comprehension Strategies for Idiomatic Expressions
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.4 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.23 |