RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    원산화교와 배화폭동(排華暴動) = The 1931 Anti-Chinese Riots in Wonsan of Colonial Northern Joseon and the Shift of Overseas Chinese

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103026633

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper examines the situations and processes of the anti-Chinese riots from a local perspective in 1931, as well as changes in the Chinese community in response to the riots. The accident of anti-Chinese riots marked a chapter in the history of overseas Chinese in Korea and had a deep-reaching impact in their lives and economic situations. However, with the exception of Incheon, detailed studies on the riots by region have not been carried out yet.
    Firstly, the anti-Chinese riots of Wonsan are examined in terms of local characteristics. Since the mid-1920s, Chinese merchants in Wonsan had been threatening grain merchants of Joseon by importing large quantities of millet from northern area of the state of Manju through Vladivostok, thus reducing freight time and costs and offering more attractive prices. Despite measures by grain merchants of Joseon to reject grains from Chinese merchants, the bulk of Manchurian millet imports were held by Chinese merchants until the late 1920s. In the late 1920s, the labor rights movement took hold in Wonsan, leading to frequent strikes among transport workers. The consignors responded to these strikes by employing Chinese laborers. Key examples of such strikes include the Wonsan laborers’ strike in June 1927 and the Wonsan general strike in January 1929.
    The accident of 1931 riots broke out in Incheon on July 3rd. Meanwhile there were more damages of human lives in Wonsan where a riot had broken out since the evening of the 4th than in Incheon, and the overseas Chinese under the Wonsan Vice Consulate were exposed to the riots, with the exception of a few who managed to reach designated shelters. In the Wonsan Vice Consulate, the majority of victims chose to return to China instead of remaining in Joseon, making it difficult to track down their addresses. Thus, fewer victims ended up receiving the relief funds. This was also related to the capacities of the vice consulate.
    Next, the study examines the changes to the status of overseas Chinese in Wonsan following the riots. The textile wholesale importers in the main stream of the Wonsan overseas Chinese society, were badly hit by the riots. Following the riots, 3 of the 4 major textile import wholesalers in Wonsan closed down, leaving just Detaiyuan(德泰源). Yongshunhao(永順號), a grain importer that grew rapidly in the mid-1920s, also had to close down. However, Tianhede (天和德), an exporter of Joseon sea cucumber and furs, remained in business even after the riots. This paper focuses on how Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to continue its operations even after the riots. Although the Qing Concession in Wonsan was abolished after the annexation of Korea by Japan, the leases in perpetuity held by overseas Chinese in Wonsan were still protected. Detaiyuan held the largest land lease in China Town(支那町) in 1920, while Tianhede held the second largest land lease, with properties outside of China Town. In terms of business operations, both Detaiyuan and Tianhede showed outstanding performance. Although the riots did cause a contraction in their business activities, Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to respond to changes in commercial networks based on existing land assets, maintaining their status within the overseas Chinese society.
    번역하기

    This paper examines the situations and processes of the anti-Chinese riots from a local perspective in 1931, as well as changes in the Chinese community in response to the riots. The accident of anti-Chinese riots marked a chapter in the history of ov...

    This paper examines the situations and processes of the anti-Chinese riots from a local perspective in 1931, as well as changes in the Chinese community in response to the riots. The accident of anti-Chinese riots marked a chapter in the history of overseas Chinese in Korea and had a deep-reaching impact in their lives and economic situations. However, with the exception of Incheon, detailed studies on the riots by region have not been carried out yet.
    Firstly, the anti-Chinese riots of Wonsan are examined in terms of local characteristics. Since the mid-1920s, Chinese merchants in Wonsan had been threatening grain merchants of Joseon by importing large quantities of millet from northern area of the state of Manju through Vladivostok, thus reducing freight time and costs and offering more attractive prices. Despite measures by grain merchants of Joseon to reject grains from Chinese merchants, the bulk of Manchurian millet imports were held by Chinese merchants until the late 1920s. In the late 1920s, the labor rights movement took hold in Wonsan, leading to frequent strikes among transport workers. The consignors responded to these strikes by employing Chinese laborers. Key examples of such strikes include the Wonsan laborers’ strike in June 1927 and the Wonsan general strike in January 1929.
    The accident of 1931 riots broke out in Incheon on July 3rd. Meanwhile there were more damages of human lives in Wonsan where a riot had broken out since the evening of the 4th than in Incheon, and the overseas Chinese under the Wonsan Vice Consulate were exposed to the riots, with the exception of a few who managed to reach designated shelters. In the Wonsan Vice Consulate, the majority of victims chose to return to China instead of remaining in Joseon, making it difficult to track down their addresses. Thus, fewer victims ended up receiving the relief funds. This was also related to the capacities of the vice consulate.
    Next, the study examines the changes to the status of overseas Chinese in Wonsan following the riots. The textile wholesale importers in the main stream of the Wonsan overseas Chinese society, were badly hit by the riots. Following the riots, 3 of the 4 major textile import wholesalers in Wonsan closed down, leaving just Detaiyuan(德泰源). Yongshunhao(永順號), a grain importer that grew rapidly in the mid-1920s, also had to close down. However, Tianhede (天和德), an exporter of Joseon sea cucumber and furs, remained in business even after the riots. This paper focuses on how Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to continue its operations even after the riots. Although the Qing Concession in Wonsan was abolished after the annexation of Korea by Japan, the leases in perpetuity held by overseas Chinese in Wonsan were still protected. Detaiyuan held the largest land lease in China Town(支那町) in 1920, while Tianhede held the second largest land lease, with properties outside of China Town. In terms of business operations, both Detaiyuan and Tianhede showed outstanding performance. Although the riots did cause a contraction in their business activities, Detaiyuan and Tianhede were able to respond to changes in commercial networks based on existing land assets, maintaining their status within the overseas Chinese society.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 배화폭동과 원산화교
    • Ⅲ. 배화폭동 이후 원산화교의 변화와 그 대응
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 배화폭동과 원산화교
    • Ⅲ. 배화폭동 이후 원산화교의 변화와 그 대응
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 손정목, "한국 개항기 도시변화과정 연구" 일지사 1982

    2 이은상, "중일전쟁(中日戰爭) 이전 시기(1912∼1936) 조선의 원산화교(元山華僑)" 인문학연구원 (60) : 103-147, 2016

    3 "조선일보"

    4 박영석, "일제 하의 在滿韓人박해문제―‘재만동포옹호동맹’의 활동을 중심으로" 고려대 아세아문제연구소 48 : 1972

    5 "매일신보"

    6 "동아일보"

    7 이정희, "근대 인천화교의 사회와 경제―인천화교협회 소장 자료를 중심으로" 학고방 2015

    8 駐朝鮮使館檔, "韓民排華暴動案(三) (03-47-205-13)"

    9 駐朝鮮使館檔, "韓民排華暴動案(一) (03-47-205-11)"

    10 김희신, "韓國內 中國 租界交涉과 中國近代外交 -駐朝鮮總領事의 租界撤廢交涉을 中心으로-" 중국사학회 (95) : 121-168, 2015

    1 손정목, "한국 개항기 도시변화과정 연구" 일지사 1982

    2 이은상, "중일전쟁(中日戰爭) 이전 시기(1912∼1936) 조선의 원산화교(元山華僑)" 인문학연구원 (60) : 103-147, 2016

    3 "조선일보"

    4 박영석, "일제 하의 在滿韓人박해문제―‘재만동포옹호동맹’의 활동을 중심으로" 고려대 아세아문제연구소 48 : 1972

    5 "매일신보"

    6 "동아일보"

    7 이정희, "근대 인천화교의 사회와 경제―인천화교협회 소장 자료를 중심으로" 학고방 2015

    8 駐朝鮮使館檔, "韓民排華暴動案(三) (03-47-205-13)"

    9 駐朝鮮使館檔, "韓民排華暴動案(一) (03-47-205-11)"

    10 김희신, "韓國內 中國 租界交涉과 中國近代外交 -駐朝鮮總領事의 租界撤廢交涉을 中心으로-" 중국사학회 (95) : 121-168, 2015

    11 駐朝鮮使館檔, "韓人仇華案(03-47-158-03)"

    12 中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會, "革命文獻 第33輯" 中央文物供應社 1964

    13 駐朝鮮使館檔, "蔣主席慰卹金案(03-47-218-16)"

    14 宋伍强, "植民地朝鮮における華僑商人の經濟力分析―1920年~1937年の元山華僑織物雜貨商を中心に" 東アジア思想文化研究會 5 : 2013

    15 松田利彦, "東アジアと半島空間—山東半島と遼東半島" 思文閣 2003

    16 駐元山副領事館, "本館區域內僑民之分布狀況與職業" 7 (7): 1934

    17 李正熙, "朝鮮華僑と近代東アジア" 京都大??術出版? 2012

    18 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮總督府統計年報"

    19 京城商業會議所, "朝鮮に於にる外國人の經濟力" (159) : 1929

    20 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮に於ける支那人" 朝鮮總督府 1924

    21 日本防衛省防衛研究所소장, "日本海軍省자료- 外国人土地法関係(1)(C08021704300)"

    22 駐朝鮮使館檔, "損失報告(二) (03-47-222-16)"

    23 駐朝鮮使館檔, "損失報告(一) (03-47-222-15)"

    24 조선총독부 외사과, "外國居留地整理에 關한 件(1914)(CJA0002292)"

    25 조선총독부 외사과, "外國居留地借地區數面積及借地料調査(1911)(CJA0002275)"

    26 조선총독부 외사과, "外國人所有地及借地調書(1920)(CJA0002298)"

    27 "外国人土地法関係(4)(C08021704600)"

    28 駐朝鮮使館檔, "商會改選董事職員(03-47-167-02)"

    29 駐朝鮮使館檔, "各館處考績案(03-47-207-05)"

    30 駐朝鮮使館檔, "各華商會選擧及改組(03-47-045-01)"

    31 駐朝鮮使館檔, "各口商務情形―各口商務情形(一) (馬廷亮)(02-35-056-01)"

    32 中國第二歷史檔案館, "南京國民政府外交部公報" 江蘇古籍出版社 1990

    33 駐朝鮮使館檔, "元山購買館地(03-47-075-01)"

    34 "元山港貿易狀況" (4083) : 1926

    35 駐朝鮮使館檔, "元山淸津兩館工作報告(03-47-222-01)"

    36 이은자, "中華民國 前期(1912∼1927) 駐朝鮮 領事館 組織 ― 人的 構成의 측면을 중심으로 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (66) : 1-31, 2015

    37 李正熙, "‘日韓併合’と朝鮮華僑―地位の變容を中心に" 日本華僑華人學會 5 : 2008

    38 이은상, "20세기 전반(1912∼1936) 식민지 조선의 신의주화교" 중국근현대사학회 (70) : 53-88, 2016

    39 이정희, "1927년 조선화교배척사건의 경위와 실태 ― 인천화교배척사건을 중심으로 ―" 동양사학회 (135) : 283-319, 2016

    40 박정현, "1927년 재만동포옹호동맹의 결성과 화교배척사건" 한국중국학회 (69) : 105-128, 2014

    41 유현, "1920년대 노동운동의 발전과 원산총파업" 한국사회사학회 19 : 1990

    42 이은자, "1920-1930년대 국경도시 신의주의 華工과 사회적 공간" 역사연구소 (79) : 319-358, 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.64 1.64 1.17
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.87 2.008 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼