RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      죽음과 책임의 계보학

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82363984

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In The Gift of Death, Jacques Derrida assesses Jan Patočka’s fundamental and original thesis of Heretical Essays on the History of Philosophy, namely, that the Platonic motif of the care of the soul is the embryo of European life and the starting point of the genealogy of responsibility in the history of Europe, and that only in Christian Europe the motif of the care of the soul is transformed into a true principle of responsibility. According to Patočka, in Christianity, the responsibility of the self or the soul does not derive from knowledge of the Divine, the cosmos, or the Good but from the soul’s exposure to the gaze of an other, ultimately the gaze of God as a Person, a gaze that constitutes the soul as a person and, for that, as a irreplaceable singular responsible self. Christian responsibility is also tied to a gift of death, because only death can give the irreplaceability on whose basis one can speak of a responsible subject, of the soul as conscience of self. Derrida, by the Blanchotian reading of death as im/possibility of impossibility in Heidegger’s Being and Time, explores the aporetic relationship between my irreplaceable and impossible responsibility for the Other. After establishing the aporetic relationship, Derrida continues to mark a decisive break with Kierkegaard and Levinas in an analysis of their Protestant interpretation of the Abrahamic story of the aborted sacrifice of Isaac, namely, that there is no convenient distinction between Kierkegaard’s
      the ethical (of generality) and the religious (of absolute singularity). He further discusses the aporetic structure of responsibility where the absolute and the general meet. Responsibility demands faithfulness to the general with its insistence on answering for oneself, public accounting for decision making, in a word, substitution, and at the same time requires silence and secrecy, in a word, singularity. Derrida seeks to establish the matrix that at once makes their undeniably distinct positions on responsibility possible between Patočka, Heidegger, Kierkegaard and Levinas, but also limits their range, distinctiveness, radicality, and even their originality. By inquiring into the various modalities of giving (oneself) death and of taking death (upon
      oneself) between these four philosophers, Derrida develops an economic model that accounts for the different positions on responsibility, their mutual contamination and passage into one another-in particular, as regards their overdetermination by themes of Christianity, Platonism, and deliberate de-Christianization as well as of Judaism.
      번역하기

      In The Gift of Death, Jacques Derrida assesses Jan Patočka’s fundamental and original thesis of Heretical Essays on the History of Philosophy, namely, that the Platonic motif of the care of the soul is the embryo of European life and the starti...

      In The Gift of Death, Jacques Derrida assesses Jan Patočka’s fundamental and original thesis of Heretical Essays on the History of Philosophy, namely, that the Platonic motif of the care of the soul is the embryo of European life and the starting point of the genealogy of responsibility in the history of Europe, and that only in Christian Europe the motif of the care of the soul is transformed into a true principle of responsibility. According to Patočka, in Christianity, the responsibility of the self or the soul does not derive from knowledge of the Divine, the cosmos, or the Good but from the soul’s exposure to the gaze of an other, ultimately the gaze of God as a Person, a gaze that constitutes the soul as a person and, for that, as a irreplaceable singular responsible self. Christian responsibility is also tied to a gift of death, because only death can give the irreplaceability on whose basis one can speak of a responsible subject, of the soul as conscience of self. Derrida, by the Blanchotian reading of death as im/possibility of impossibility in Heidegger’s Being and Time, explores the aporetic relationship between my irreplaceable and impossible responsibility for the Other. After establishing the aporetic relationship, Derrida continues to mark a decisive break with Kierkegaard and Levinas in an analysis of their Protestant interpretation of the Abrahamic story of the aborted sacrifice of Isaac, namely, that there is no convenient distinction between Kierkegaard’s
      the ethical (of generality) and the religious (of absolute singularity). He further discusses the aporetic structure of responsibility where the absolute and the general meet. Responsibility demands faithfulness to the general with its insistence on answering for oneself, public accounting for decision making, in a word, substitution, and at the same time requires silence and secrecy, in a word, singularity. Derrida seeks to establish the matrix that at once makes their undeniably distinct positions on responsibility possible between Patočka, Heidegger, Kierkegaard and Levinas, but also limits their range, distinctiveness, radicality, and even their originality. By inquiring into the various modalities of giving (oneself) death and of taking death (upon
      oneself) between these four philosophers, Derrida develops an economic model that accounts for the different positions on responsibility, their mutual contamination and passage into one another-in particular, as regards their overdetermination by themes of Christianity, Platonism, and deliberate de-Christianization as well as of Judaism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 구자광, ""도래할 민주주의": 지젝 vs. 데리다" 한국라깡과현대정신분석학회 10 (10): 7-26, 2008

      2 문성원, "책임 문제에 대한 철학적 일고찰" 12 (12): 33-55, 2001

      3 강우성, "차이의 연대와 해체론의 운명: 자끄 데리다의 『맑스의 유령들』" 영미문학연구회 (18) : 179-205, 2005

      4 한용재, "정의를 기다리며: 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 법의 문제" 한국셰익스피어학회 42 (42): 149-172, 2006

      5 김종갑, "이론과 실천의 교환: 해체비평의 정치성을 향하여" 5 (5): 209-233, 2000

      6 Jackson, Ken, "‘One Wish’ or the Possibility of the Impossible: Derrida, the Gift, and God in Timon of Athens" 52 (52): 34-66, 2001

      7 Bernasconi, Robert, "What Goes Around Comes Around: Derrida and Levinas on the Economy of the Gift and the Gift of Genealogy in The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity" Routledge 256-273, 1997

      8 Simmons, J. Aaron, "What About Isaac?: Rereading “Fear and Trembling” and Rethinking Kierkegaardian Ethics" 35 (35): 319-345, 2007

      9 Levinas, Emmanuel, "Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority" Duquesne UP 1969

      10 Blanchot, Maurice, "The Space of Literature" Nebraska UP 1982

      1 구자광, ""도래할 민주주의": 지젝 vs. 데리다" 한국라깡과현대정신분석학회 10 (10): 7-26, 2008

      2 문성원, "책임 문제에 대한 철학적 일고찰" 12 (12): 33-55, 2001

      3 강우성, "차이의 연대와 해체론의 운명: 자끄 데리다의 『맑스의 유령들』" 영미문학연구회 (18) : 179-205, 2005

      4 한용재, "정의를 기다리며: 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 법의 문제" 한국셰익스피어학회 42 (42): 149-172, 2006

      5 김종갑, "이론과 실천의 교환: 해체비평의 정치성을 향하여" 5 (5): 209-233, 2000

      6 Jackson, Ken, "‘One Wish’ or the Possibility of the Impossible: Derrida, the Gift, and God in Timon of Athens" 52 (52): 34-66, 2001

      7 Bernasconi, Robert, "What Goes Around Comes Around: Derrida and Levinas on the Economy of the Gift and the Gift of Genealogy in The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity" Routledge 256-273, 1997

      8 Simmons, J. Aaron, "What About Isaac?: Rereading “Fear and Trembling” and Rethinking Kierkegaardian Ethics" 35 (35): 319-345, 2007

      9 Levinas, Emmanuel, "Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority" Duquesne UP 1969

      10 Blanchot, Maurice, "The Space of Literature" Nebraska UP 1982

      11 Kotsko, Adam, "The Sermon on Mount Moriah: Faith and the Secret in The Gift of Death" 49 : 44-61, 2008

      12 Caputo,D.John, "The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida:Religion without Religion" Indiana UP 1997

      13 Derrida, Jacques, "The Gift of Death" Nebraska UP 1986

      14 Critchley, Simon, "The Chiasmus: Levinas, Derrida and the Ethical Demand for Deconstruction in Deconstruction: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies" Routledge 96-311, 2003

      15 Caputo,D.John, "Shedding Tears beyond Being: Derrida’s Confession of Prayer in Augustine and Postmodernism: Confessions and Circumfession" Indiana UP 95-114, 2005

      16 Hanson, Jeffrey, "Returning (to) the Gift of Death: Violence and History in Derrida and Levinas" 67 (67): 1-15, 2010

      17 Plato, "Phaedo" BibioBazar 2008

      18 Derrida, Jacques, "Limited Inc" Northwestern UP 1988

      19 Westphal,Merold, "Levinas and Kierkegaard in Dialogue" Indiana UP 2008

      20 Patočka, Jan, "Is Technological Civilization Decadent, and Why? In Heretical Essays in the Philosophy of History" Open Court 95-118, 1996

      21 Derrida, Jacques, "Force of Law: ‘The Mystical Foundation of Authority’ in Cardozo Law Review" 919-1045, 1990

      22 Kierkegaard, Søren, "Fear and Trembling: Repetition" Princeton UP 1983

      23 Gasché,Rodolphe, "Europe,or the Infinite Task:A Study of a Philosophical Concept" Stanford UP 2009

      24 Attridge, Derek, "Derrida’s Singularity: Literature and Ethics in Derrida’s Legacies: Literature and Philosophy" Routledge 12-25, 2008

      25 윤일환, "Death as an Existential and Finitude of Possibility in Being and Time" 한국영미어문학회 (93) : 203-226, 2009

      26 Heidegger, Martin, "Being and Time" Harper & Row 1962

      27 Derrida, Jacques, "Aporias: Dying−witting (One Another at) the “Limits of Truth.”" Stanford UP 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학회명변경 영문명 : The Criticism And Theory Society Of Korea -> The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-11-28 학술지등록 한글명 : 비평과이론
      외국어명 : The Journal of Criticism and Theory
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.36 1.442 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼