RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    섹스 로봇의 윤리적 쟁점 - 전통적 윤리이론 기반 연구에 대한 한가지 옹호 - = Ethical Issues on Sex Robots - An Advocate of Research on Sex Robots Based on Traditional Ethical Theories -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109081681

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, some scholars insist that traditional ethical theories are not appropriate for dealing with human-robot interaction mainly because a robot which is neither a moral agent nor a moral patient has no moral standing according to these theories. In this context, this paper claims that it is not only possible but also necessary to raise and investigate the ethical issues of Sexbots from the perspective of traditional ethical theories. First, this paper maintains that one can discuss various ethical issues of sexbots with a view to traditional ethical theories if one focuses not on the inner properties that a robot lacks but on the external properties like the robot’s behaviors and its relation to humans. Second, this paper indicates two kinds of potential harm the user of sexbots may suffer from the perspective of traditional ethical theories.
    번역하기

    Recently, some scholars insist that traditional ethical theories are not appropriate for dealing with human-robot interaction mainly because a robot which is neither a moral agent nor a moral patient has no moral standing according to these theories. ...

    Recently, some scholars insist that traditional ethical theories are not appropriate for dealing with human-robot interaction mainly because a robot which is neither a moral agent nor a moral patient has no moral standing according to these theories. In this context, this paper claims that it is not only possible but also necessary to raise and investigate the ethical issues of Sexbots from the perspective of traditional ethical theories. First, this paper maintains that one can discuss various ethical issues of sexbots with a view to traditional ethical theories if one focuses not on the inner properties that a robot lacks but on the external properties like the robot’s behaviors and its relation to humans. Second, this paper indicates two kinds of potential harm the user of sexbots may suffer from the perspective of traditional ethical theories.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 나건웅, "짝퉁·최음제·욱일기 팔아요…‘무법지대’ 알리·테무"

    2 김태경, "전통적 성윤리에 기반한 섹스로봇에 대한 도덕적 가치판단은 정당한가?" 107 : 229-255, 2019

    3 고인석, "인공지능과 로봇의 윤리" 세창출판사 2022

    4 Müller, V., "인공지능과 로봇공학의 윤리학" 에라스무스 2023

    5 김상득, "윤리적 행동주의와 AI 로봇의 도덕적 지위" 167 : 59-81, 2023

    6 신상규, "섹스로봇과 상징적 재현의 문제" 14 (14): 31-53, 2020

    7 구교선, "섹스로봇과 상징-결과 논변" 138 : 61-85, 2022

    8 김태경, "섹스로봇(Sex Robot)의 상용화가 갖는 윤리적 문제와 윤리적 정당성 확보에 대하여" 96 (96): 69-85, 2019

    9 Hassan, M., "Why Social Robots Need Self-Preservation to be Objects of Moral Consideration" 2023

    10 Johnson, D. G., "Why Robots Should Not Be Treated Like Animals" 20 (20): 291-301, 2018

    1 나건웅, "짝퉁·최음제·욱일기 팔아요…‘무법지대’ 알리·테무"

    2 김태경, "전통적 성윤리에 기반한 섹스로봇에 대한 도덕적 가치판단은 정당한가?" 107 : 229-255, 2019

    3 고인석, "인공지능과 로봇의 윤리" 세창출판사 2022

    4 Müller, V., "인공지능과 로봇공학의 윤리학" 에라스무스 2023

    5 김상득, "윤리적 행동주의와 AI 로봇의 도덕적 지위" 167 : 59-81, 2023

    6 신상규, "섹스로봇과 상징적 재현의 문제" 14 (14): 31-53, 2020

    7 구교선, "섹스로봇과 상징-결과 논변" 138 : 61-85, 2022

    8 김태경, "섹스로봇(Sex Robot)의 상용화가 갖는 윤리적 문제와 윤리적 정당성 확보에 대하여" 96 (96): 69-85, 2019

    9 Hassan, M., "Why Social Robots Need Self-Preservation to be Objects of Moral Consideration" 2023

    10 Johnson, D. G., "Why Robots Should Not Be Treated Like Animals" 20 (20): 291-301, 2018

    11 Danaher, J., "Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle : A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism" 26 : 2023-2049, 2020

    12 Danaher, J., "The Philosophical Case for Robot Friendship" 3 (3): 5-24, 2019

    13 Gunkel, D., "Social Robotics and the Good Life: The Normative Side of Forming Emotional Bonds with Robot" Transcript 5-76, 2022

    14 International Planned Parenthood Foundation, "Sexual Rights: An IPPF Declaration"

    15 Begon, J., "Sexual Perversion : A Liberal Account" 50 (50): 341-362, 2019

    16 Priest, G., "Sexual Perversion" 75 (75): 360-372, 1997

    17 Nagel, T., "Sexual Perversion" 66 (66): 5-17, 1969

    18 Scruton, R., "Sexual Desire : A Philosophical Investigation" Weidenfeld and Nicolson 1986

    19 Lee, J., "Sex Robots : The Future of Desire" Palgrave Macmillan 2017

    20 Gersen, J. S., "Sex Lex Machina and Artificial Intelligence" 119 (119): 2019

    21 McArthur, N., "Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications" Cambridge University Press 31-46, 2017

    22 Danaher, J., "Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications" Cambridge University Press 103-131, 2017

    23 Di Nucci, E., "Robot Sex: Social and Ethical Implications" Cambridge University Press 73-88, 2017

    24 Coeckelbergh, M., "Robot Rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration" 12 : 209-221, 2010

    25 Darling, K., "Robot Ethics 2.0" Oxford University Press 173-188, 2020

    26 Coeckelbergh, M., "Robot Ethics" MIT Press 2022

    27 Danaher, J., "Regulating Child Sex Robots : Restriction or Experimentation?" 27 (27): 553-575, 2019

    28 Goldman, A., "Plain Sex" 6 (6): 267-287, 1977

    29 Sterri, A., "Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics" Oxford University Press 241-257, 2024

    30 Nyholm, S., "Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics" Oxford University Press 43-62, 2024

    31 Jecker, N., "Nothing to be Ashamed of : Sex Robots for Older Adults with Disabilities" 47 (47): 26-32, 2021

    32 Suzuki, Y., "Measuring Empathy for Human and Robot Hand Pain Using Electroencephalography" 5 : 15924-, 2015

    33 Levy, D., "Love+Sex with Robots" HarperCollins Publishers 2007

    34 Stone, R., "Living in tht Age of the Automatic Sweetheart : A Brief Survey on the Ethics of Sexual Robotics" 13 : 21-30, 2022

    35 Nyholm, S., "Humans and Robots" Rowman & Littlefield 2020

    36 Gunkel, D., "How to Survive a Robot Invasion: Rights, Responsibility, and AI" Routledge 2020

    37 Primoratz, I., "Ethics and Sex" Routledge 1999

    38 World Association for Sexual Health Advisory Council, "Declaration of Sexual Rights"

    39 Smids, J., "Danaher’s Ethical Behaviourism: An Adequate Guide to Assessing the Moral Status of a Robot?" 26 : 2849-2866, 2020

    40 Musiał, M., "Criticizing Danaher’s Approach to Superficial Deception" 29 (29): 2023

    41 Bywater, I., "Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea" Clarendon Press 1894

    42 Rosenthal-von der Pütten, "An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot" 5 (5): 17-34,

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼