아이젠만 建築의 構築性에 관한 硏究 = The Tectonics in Eisenman’s Architecture

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Digital Architecture is able to produce innovative and attractive forms than ever, Despite the superficial novelty, it is important to observe the underlying logic, especially form-generating process. Fundamentally, Digital architecture is a classic in terms of that it is based on the form derived from technology. It is a Baroque as well due to the attitude stressing on the form and pursuing changes from that.
Kenneth Frampton, who has developed a techno-deterministic theory, has a contemptuous view towards Digital Architecture as empty play on the monitor rather than a result derived from the process to build a space in the form of ‘tectonic’. In this background, Eisenman's Architecture can be an important implication and an illustrative example to overcome Frampton’s view. Eisenman has explored aspects of criticism and theoretical work simultaneously utilizing digital technology and develop a dramatic evolution with the process of logical system. The study is evaluate his architecture as well as his theoretical background and found autonomous architectural construction as his major achievement. Digital technology is became a main tool to implement his life-long pursuit towards ‘autonomous architecture’.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Digital Architecture is able to produce innovative and attractive forms than ever, Despite the superficial novelty, it is important to observe the underlying logic, especially form-generating process. Fundamentally, Digital architecture is a classic in terms of that it is based on the form derived from technology. It is a Baroque as well due to the attitude stressing on the form and pursuing changes from that.
Kenneth Frampton, who has developed a techno-deterministic theory, has a contemptuous view towards Digital Architecture as empty play on the monitor rather than a result derived from the process to build a space in the form of ‘tectonic’. In this background, Eisenman's Architecture can be an important implication and an illustrative example to overcome Frampton’s view. Eisenman has explored aspects of criticism and theoretical work simultaneously utilizing digital technology and develop a dramatic evolution with the process of logical system. The study is evaluate his architecture as well as his theoretical background and found autonomous architectural construction as his major achievement. Digital technology is became a main tool to implement his life-long pursuit towards ‘autonomous architecture’.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Madan Sarup, "후기구조주의와 포스트모더니즘" 조형교육 2008

2 Madan Sarup, "후기구조주의와 포스트모더니즘" 조형교육 2008

3 임석재, "형태주의 건축운동" 시공사 1999

4 정인하, "현대건축과 비표상" 아카넷 2006

5 강손근, "클레멘트 그린버그의 형식주의 미술비평" 대동철학회 32 : 121-138, 2005

6 "아이젠만과의 대화" 공간 9907-,

7 츠베탕 토도로프, "러시아 형식주의" 이화문고 1981

8 봉일범, "건축의 외연" 시공문화사 2005

9 Christopher Norris, "What is Deconstruction" 도서출판 청람 1996

10 Peter Eisenman, "The End of the Classical: The End of the Beginning, the End of the End (1984), In Theorizing a new agenda for architecture" Princeton Architectural Press 1996

11 Ray Smith, "Super Mannerism: New Attitudes in Post-Modern Architecture, In 변형과 분해의 논리" 건축과 환경 8811-,

12 Kenneth Frampton, "Studies in Tectonics Culture: The Poeics of Construction in Ninteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture"

13 P. Eisenman, "Post/El Cards:A Reply to Jacques Derrida" 건축과 환경 12 : 1990

14 Kenneth Frampton, "Modern Architecture : a critical history"

15 Neil Leach, "ETET 새로운 건축 다이어그램" 건축세계 2007

16 Peter Eisenman, "Diagram Diaries" Universe 1999

17 Peter 아이젠만, "A+U" 1996