RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      임상시험에서의 공변량을 고려한 확률화 방법들의 비교 = Comparing the Randomization Methods Considering the Covariates in a Clinical Trial

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105744460

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In clinical trials, patients should be randomly allocated to treatment and control groups that consider the balance of their prognostic factors(covariates). There are many randomization methods and stratification is popular in Korea. In stratification, patients are divided into strata based on covariates and then the patients are randomly assigned to the arms of each strata. If the number of covariates increases then the number of strata increases rapidly and the results may not be reliable when the patients are inadequate in each strata. To complement this problem Pocock and Simon (1975) suggested a new randomization method that called for minimization focusing on the balance of covariates. In this study, we compare the advantages and disadvantages, the imbalance of covariates, the power of minimization, and other randomization methods by simulation.
      번역하기

      In clinical trials, patients should be randomly allocated to treatment and control groups that consider the balance of their prognostic factors(covariates). There are many randomization methods and stratification is popular in Korea. In stratification...

      In clinical trials, patients should be randomly allocated to treatment and control groups that consider the balance of their prognostic factors(covariates). There are many randomization methods and stratification is popular in Korea. In stratification, patients are divided into strata based on covariates and then the patients are randomly assigned to the arms of each strata. If the number of covariates increases then the number of strata increases rapidly and the results may not be reliable when the patients are inadequate in each strata. To complement this problem Pocock and Simon (1975) suggested a new randomization method that called for minimization focusing on the balance of covariates. In this study, we compare the advantages and disadvantages, the imbalance of covariates, the power of minimization, and other randomization methods by simulation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이재원, "생명과학연구를 위한 통계적 방법" 자유아카데미 2005

      2 McEntegart, D. J., "The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques:an overview" 37 : 293-308, 2003

      3 Gronbladh, A., "The method of minimization proposed by Pocock and Simon-Properties with regards to balance and inferential validity" Uppsala University 2004

      4 Scott, N. W., "The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review" 23 : 662-674, 2002

      5 Kernan, W. N., "Stratified randomization for clinical trials" 52 : 19-26, 1999

      6 Pocock, S. J., "Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial" 31 : 103-115, 1975

      7 Simon, R., "Restricted randomization designs in clinical trials" 35 : 503-512, 1979

      8 Therneau, T. M., "How many stratification factors is “too many” to use in a randomization plan?" 14 : 98-108, 1993

      9 Weir, C. J., "Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial" 22 : 705-726, 2003

      10 Kundt, G., "Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures" 48 : 129-134, 2009

      1 이재원, "생명과학연구를 위한 통계적 방법" 자유아카데미 2005

      2 McEntegart, D. J., "The pursuit of balance using stratified and dynamic randomization techniques:an overview" 37 : 293-308, 2003

      3 Gronbladh, A., "The method of minimization proposed by Pocock and Simon-Properties with regards to balance and inferential validity" Uppsala University 2004

      4 Scott, N. W., "The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review" 23 : 662-674, 2002

      5 Kernan, W. N., "Stratified randomization for clinical trials" 52 : 19-26, 1999

      6 Pocock, S. J., "Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial" 31 : 103-115, 1975

      7 Simon, R., "Restricted randomization designs in clinical trials" 35 : 503-512, 1979

      8 Therneau, T. M., "How many stratification factors is “too many” to use in a randomization plan?" 14 : 98-108, 1993

      9 Weir, C. J., "Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial" 22 : 705-726, 2003

      10 Kundt, G., "Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures" 48 : 129-134, 2009

      11 Wade, A., "An investigation of minimisation criteria" 6 : 1471-2288, 2006

      12 Tu, D., "Adjustment of treatment effect for covariates in clinical trials:Statistical and regulatory issues" 34 : 511-523, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.35 0.34 0.565 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼