RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    국내상장 제약회사의 경영효율성 측정에 관한 연구 = DEA모형의 동태적 적용

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856309

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The static Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) model can hardly be applied to measure the managerial efficiency of a company if there exist no comparable or appropriate companies. Even if the static DEA models are applicable, the business unit wish efficiency value of 1.0 does not know the possibility of further improvement in its managerial efficiency. Previous research on the dynamic analysis and longitudinal section analysis methods indicates that a DEA model may he used in comparison of the dynamic efficiency in multiple periods for a single company. In this paper we suggest an improved approach to break such a tie-up situation: a dynamic efficiency comparison of a single company`s input and output factors for multiple periods using the DEA model. For a case study, we used managerial data of 30 pharmaceutical companies listed in Korea Stock Exchange. The static DEA model could check the efficiencies of the 30 companies. Among them, two companies showed the same static efficiency of 1.0. This means the two are the best and tie. Here, with proposed dynamic DEA approach. we found that one company had really achieved positive efficiency enhancement in dynamic sense, but the other could get more improved in terms of input and output factors.
    번역하기

    The static Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) model can hardly be applied to measure the managerial efficiency of a company if there exist no comparable or appropriate companies. Even if the static DEA models are applicable, the business unit wish effici...

    The static Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) model can hardly be applied to measure the managerial efficiency of a company if there exist no comparable or appropriate companies. Even if the static DEA models are applicable, the business unit wish efficiency value of 1.0 does not know the possibility of further improvement in its managerial efficiency. Previous research on the dynamic analysis and longitudinal section analysis methods indicates that a DEA model may he used in comparison of the dynamic efficiency in multiple periods for a single company. In this paper we suggest an improved approach to break such a tie-up situation: a dynamic efficiency comparison of a single company`s input and output factors for multiple periods using the DEA model. For a case study, we used managerial data of 30 pharmaceutical companies listed in Korea Stock Exchange. The static DEA model could check the efficiencies of the 30 companies. Among them, two companies showed the same static efficiency of 1.0. This means the two are the best and tie. Here, with proposed dynamic DEA approach. we found that one company had really achieved positive efficiency enhancement in dynamic sense, but the other could get more improved in terms of input and output factors.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼