RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    연극영화과목 중등교사 임용시험 1차(선택형) 평가 개선 방안 연구 = A Study on the Evaluation Instrument of the 1st Test (multiple choice question type) of Employment for Secondary School Teacher in Theater & Film Section

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104122407

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it has to be prepared the evaluation instrument for the comprehension of the subject in theater and film. And also it has to be presented methodology for education. That is for teacher professional development and the development of more effective curriculum to produce secondary teacher in theater and film.
    This paper researches on the development of instrument of the 1st test which is given questions by multiple choice type. In this paper, it is included the purpose, a principle of the development of the evaluation instrument, and also prepared a plan for a fair evaluation. For a fair evaluation, this study present the questions of a good quality examined by the degree of difficulty, universal validity, reliability, distinction and practicalness.
    The 1st evaluation instrument is based on the 'development of teacher qualification standard of major subject, detailed evaluation field and joint study of teaching ability evaluation'. Committee members for the test select a evaluation details factor in 45 evaluation areas, and develop the questions.
    번역하기

    The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it ha...

    The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it has to be prepared the evaluation instrument for the comprehension of the subject in theater and film. And also it has to be presented methodology for education. That is for teacher professional development and the development of more effective curriculum to produce secondary teacher in theater and film.
    This paper researches on the development of instrument of the 1st test which is given questions by multiple choice type. In this paper, it is included the purpose, a principle of the development of the evaluation instrument, and also prepared a plan for a fair evaluation. For a fair evaluation, this study present the questions of a good quality examined by the degree of difficulty, universal validity, reliability, distinction and practicalness.
    The 1st evaluation instrument is based on the 'development of teacher qualification standard of major subject, detailed evaluation field and joint study of teaching ability evaluation'. Committee members for the test select a evaluation details factor in 45 evaluation areas, and develop the questions.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it has to be prepared the evaluation instrument for the comprehension of the subject in theater and film. And also it has to be presented methodology for education. That is for teacher professional development and the development of more effective curriculum to produce secondary teacher in theater and film.
    This paper researches on the development of instrument of the 1st test which is given questions by multiple choice type. In this paper, it is included the purpose, a principle of the development of the evaluation instrument, and also prepared a plan for a fair evaluation. For a fair evaluation, this study present the questions of a good quality examined by the degree of difficulty, universal validity, reliability, distinction and practicalness.
    The 1st evaluation instrument is based on the 'development of teacher qualification standard of major subject, detailed evaluation field and joint study of teaching ability evaluation'. Committee members for the test select a evaluation details factor in 45 evaluation areas, and develop the questions.
    번역하기

    The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it ha...

    The 1st test for secondary teacher in Theater and Film section is a multiple choice question type. The 1st test has an object to select a person which has an ability and a qualification as a teacher in theater and film section. For this purpose, it has to be prepared the evaluation instrument for the comprehension of the subject in theater and film. And also it has to be presented methodology for education. That is for teacher professional development and the development of more effective curriculum to produce secondary teacher in theater and film.
    This paper researches on the development of instrument of the 1st test which is given questions by multiple choice type. In this paper, it is included the purpose, a principle of the development of the evaluation instrument, and also prepared a plan for a fair evaluation. For a fair evaluation, this study present the questions of a good quality examined by the degree of difficulty, universal validity, reliability, distinction and practicalness.
    The 1st evaluation instrument is based on the 'development of teacher qualification standard of major subject, detailed evaluation field and joint study of teaching ability evaluation'. Committee members for the test select a evaluation details factor in 45 evaluation areas, and develop the questions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김영채, "창의적 문제 해결: 창의적 이론, 개발과 수업" 교육과학사 2001

    2 서울시 교육청, "정기고사 평가문항 출제 길잡이" 서울시 교육청 2007

    3 한국교육과정평가원, "전공과목의 교사자격기준 개발과 평가영역 상세화 및 수업능력평가를 위한 워크숍 자료집" 한국교육과정평가원 2008

    4 데이비드 보드웰, "영화예술" 이론과 실천 1993

    5 로이 톰슨, "영화연출과 편집문법" 책과 길 1999

    6 스테판 샤프, "영화구조의 미학" 영화언어 1997

    7 한국연극교육학회, "연극" 연극과 인간 2002

    8 이정국, "시나리오 창작기법" 상상공방 2007

    9 임찬빈, "수업평가매뉴얼 : 음악과 수업평가 기준" 한국교육과정평가원 2006

    10 문창호, "동영상디자인" 집문당 2006

    1 김영채, "창의적 문제 해결: 창의적 이론, 개발과 수업" 교육과학사 2001

    2 서울시 교육청, "정기고사 평가문항 출제 길잡이" 서울시 교육청 2007

    3 한국교육과정평가원, "전공과목의 교사자격기준 개발과 평가영역 상세화 및 수업능력평가를 위한 워크숍 자료집" 한국교육과정평가원 2008

    4 데이비드 보드웰, "영화예술" 이론과 실천 1993

    5 로이 톰슨, "영화연출과 편집문법" 책과 길 1999

    6 스테판 샤프, "영화구조의 미학" 영화언어 1997

    7 한국연극교육학회, "연극" 연극과 인간 2002

    8 이정국, "시나리오 창작기법" 상상공방 2007

    9 임찬빈, "수업평가매뉴얼 : 음악과 수업평가 기준" 한국교육과정평가원 2006

    10 문창호, "동영상디자인" 집문당 2006

    11 "교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호, 예술계열 전문교과 교육과정"

    12 길형석, "교육과정과 교육평가" 동문사 2001

    13 한국교육과정평가원, "고등학교 예술계열 전문교과 교육과정 개정 시안 연구 개발" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

    14 "2008학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(환경)"

    15 "2008학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(체육)"

    16 "2008학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(연극영화)"

    17 "2008학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(보건)"

    18 "2008학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(공예디자인)"

    19 "2006학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(연극영화)"

    20 "2003학년도 중등교사 신규임용 후보자 선정 경쟁 시험 기출문제(연극영화)"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-09-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Film Studies Association Of Korea (Fisak) -> Korean Cinema Association (KCA) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-04-09 학술지등록 한글명 : 영화연구
    외국어명 : Film Studies
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.58 0.58 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.58 0.55 1.055 0.29
    더보기
    해외이동버튼