RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      집현전(集賢殿)의 조직과 운영 체계 = The Organization and Administration of the Jiphyeonjeon (集賢殿)

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      King Sejong regarded the reorganization of Confucian rites, music, and the managerial system as a task of upmost importance. To achieve this, experts who studied the theoretical basis of the related fields and acquired practical abilities to carry out governmental projects were required. To nurture the foundation of academic research and educate intellectuals, King Sejong utilized two institutions: Gyeongyeon (royal lecture) and Jiphyeonjeon (Hall of Worthies). These two, maintaining close relations with one another, played a crucial role in the study of Confucian rituals and systems during the Sejong era. Sejong added a new function to Jiphyeonjeon, which was the upbringing of pupils. Jiphyeonjeon selected young and capable civil officials and had them advise the King by discussing classics and histories. The King founded salary posts in Jiphyeonjeon in 1420 and had those in the posts hold the positions of Gyeongyeongwan (royal lecturer) as well. The total number of Jiphyeonjeon officials differed, from 10, 32, or 20 at times, but the responsibility of being responsible for Gyeongyeon and Seoyeon (lecture for the Crown Prince) and for authoring major state documents were maintained as their own by tradition.
      Personnel management in Jiphyeonjeon was characterized by the systems of long-term service and promotion by seniority. The officials of Jiphyeonjeon kept the same position for many years to focus on studying their specialties. Sejong stressed that the sole purpose of Jiphyeonjeon was to author major state documents. and therefore required the scholars to concentrate on life-long study. The officials were promoted according to the order of hire, and this system was considered to be the custom of Jiphyeonjeon. They followed the rule of seniority of official employment and age, so they could respect superior Confucian scholars. Through these processes, Jiphyeonjeon and Gyeongyeon became the preeminent scholarly research institutions. In Gyeongyeon, Sejong and the officials recited Confucius texts of Four Books and Five Classics, as well as history books such as Zizhitongjian and Xinglidaquan. They did not stop at mere reading, but reached a level of scholarly studying by adding annotations. Intellectual achievements in Gyeongyeon served as the foundations for the rearrangement of rituals and music, and the reorganization of various institutions. Conclusively, Jiphyeonjeon can be understood as the royal institution where selected officials from the highest civil service examination, nurtured by long-term engagements in Gyeongyeon, were raised as competent intellectuals, and provided administrative counsel for state management upon the requests of the royal court.
      번역하기

      King Sejong regarded the reorganization of Confucian rites, music, and the managerial system as a task of upmost importance. To achieve this, experts who studied the theoretical basis of the related fields and acquired practical abilities to carry out...

      King Sejong regarded the reorganization of Confucian rites, music, and the managerial system as a task of upmost importance. To achieve this, experts who studied the theoretical basis of the related fields and acquired practical abilities to carry out governmental projects were required. To nurture the foundation of academic research and educate intellectuals, King Sejong utilized two institutions: Gyeongyeon (royal lecture) and Jiphyeonjeon (Hall of Worthies). These two, maintaining close relations with one another, played a crucial role in the study of Confucian rituals and systems during the Sejong era. Sejong added a new function to Jiphyeonjeon, which was the upbringing of pupils. Jiphyeonjeon selected young and capable civil officials and had them advise the King by discussing classics and histories. The King founded salary posts in Jiphyeonjeon in 1420 and had those in the posts hold the positions of Gyeongyeongwan (royal lecturer) as well. The total number of Jiphyeonjeon officials differed, from 10, 32, or 20 at times, but the responsibility of being responsible for Gyeongyeon and Seoyeon (lecture for the Crown Prince) and for authoring major state documents were maintained as their own by tradition.
      Personnel management in Jiphyeonjeon was characterized by the systems of long-term service and promotion by seniority. The officials of Jiphyeonjeon kept the same position for many years to focus on studying their specialties. Sejong stressed that the sole purpose of Jiphyeonjeon was to author major state documents. and therefore required the scholars to concentrate on life-long study. The officials were promoted according to the order of hire, and this system was considered to be the custom of Jiphyeonjeon. They followed the rule of seniority of official employment and age, so they could respect superior Confucian scholars. Through these processes, Jiphyeonjeon and Gyeongyeon became the preeminent scholarly research institutions. In Gyeongyeon, Sejong and the officials recited Confucius texts of Four Books and Five Classics, as well as history books such as Zizhitongjian and Xinglidaquan. They did not stop at mere reading, but reached a level of scholarly studying by adding annotations. Intellectual achievements in Gyeongyeon served as the foundations for the rearrangement of rituals and music, and the reorganization of various institutions. Conclusively, Jiphyeonjeon can be understood as the royal institution where selected officials from the highest civil service examination, nurtured by long-term engagements in Gyeongyeon, were raised as competent intellectuals, and provided administrative counsel for state management upon the requests of the royal court.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "한국고전종합DB"

      2 박홍갑, "집현전 학사 최만리의 정치활동" 한국고전번역원 37 (37): 193-220, 2011

      3 "조선왕조실록"

      4 손유경, "세종조 집현전 학사의 교유 양상 연구 - 진관사 사가독서 참여인을 중심으로 -" 한국한문고전학회 37 (37): 103-142, 2018

      5 구만옥, "세종시대의 과학기술" 들녘 2016

      6 손보기, "세종대왕과 집현전" 세종대왕기념사업회 1984

      7 "高麗史"

      8 成大中, "靑城雜記"

      9 兪英玉, "集賢殿의 運營과 思想的 傾向 — 性理學 理解를 中心으로 —" 釜山大學校 18 : 1994

      10 李載喆, "集賢殿의 機能에 대한 硏究" 연세대학교 인문학연구원(延世大學校 文科大學) 30 : 1973

      1 "한국고전종합DB"

      2 박홍갑, "집현전 학사 최만리의 정치활동" 한국고전번역원 37 (37): 193-220, 2011

      3 "조선왕조실록"

      4 손유경, "세종조 집현전 학사의 교유 양상 연구 - 진관사 사가독서 참여인을 중심으로 -" 한국한문고전학회 37 (37): 103-142, 2018

      5 구만옥, "세종시대의 과학기술" 들녘 2016

      6 손보기, "세종대왕과 집현전" 세종대왕기념사업회 1984

      7 "高麗史"

      8 成大中, "靑城雜記"

      9 兪英玉, "集賢殿의 運營과 思想的 傾向 — 性理學 理解를 中心으로 —" 釜山大學校 18 : 1994

      10 李載喆, "集賢殿의 機能에 대한 硏究" 연세대학교 인문학연구원(延世大學校 文科大學) 30 : 1973

      11 崔承熙, "集賢殿硏究(下)— 置廢始末과 機能分析 —" 歷史學會 33 : 1967

      12 崔承熙, "集賢殿硏究(上)— 置廢始末과 機能分析 —" 歷史學會 32 : 1966

      13 姜文植, "集賢殿 출신 官人의 學問觀과 政治觀" 서울大學校 人文大學 國史學科 39 : 1998

      14 鄭杜熙, "集賢殿 學士 硏究" 全北大學校 史學會 4 : 1980

      15 한충희, "朝鮮初期 集賢殿官硏究" 朝鮮史硏究會 16 : 2007

      16 崔承熙, "朝鮮初期 言官에 관한 硏究 — 集賢殿官의 言官化 —" 서울大學校 人文大學 國史學科 1 : 1973

      17 鄭杜熙, "朝鮮初期 政治支配勢力硏究"

      18 韓亨周, "朝鮮 世宗代의 古制硏究에 대한 考察" 歷史學會 136 : 1992

      19 李瀷, "星湖僿說"

      20 "成宗實錄"

      21 崔鉉培先生 還甲記念 論文集刊行會, "崔鉉培 先生 還甲記念論文集" 思想界社 1954

      22 "定宗實錄"

      23 "太祖實錄"

      24 "太宗實錄"

      25 "大東野乘"

      26 "國朝文科榜目"

      27 徐居正, "四佳集"

      28 "世宗實錄"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-07 학회명변경 영문명 : Seoul National University Institute of Humanities -> Institute of Humanities, Seoul National University KCI등재
      2015-01-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Seoul National University the Journal of Humanites -> Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.68 0.62 1.317 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼