Participatory Web Users’ Information Activities and Credibility Assessment

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Assessment of information credibility is a ubiquitous human activity given that people constantly make decisions and selections based on the value of information in a variety of information seeking and use contexts. Today, people are increasingly engaging in diverse online activities beyond searching for and reading information, including activities such as creating, tagging and rating content, shopping, and listening to and watching multimedia content. The Web 2.0 environment presents new challenges for people because the burden of information evaluation is shifted from professional gatekeepers to individual information consumers. At the same time, however, it also provides unprecedented opportunities for people to use tools and features that help them to make informed credibility judgments by relying on other people’s ratings and recommendations. This paper introduces fundamental notions and dimensions of credibility, and contends that credibility assessment can be best understood with respect to human information behavior because it encompasses both the level of effort people exert as well as the heuristics they employ to evaluate information. The paper reports on a survey study investigating people’s credibility judgments with respect to online information, focusing on the constructs, heuristics, and interactions involved in people’s credibility assessment processes within the context of their everyday life information activities. Using an online activity diary method, empirical data about people’s online activities and their associated credibility assessments were collected at multiple points throughout the day for three days. The results indicate that distinct credibility assessment heuristics are emerging as people engage in diverse online activities involving more user-generated and multimedia content. A heuristic approach suggests that people apply mental shortcuts or rules of thumb in order to minimize the amount of cognitive effort and time required to make credibility judgments. The paper discusses why a heuristic approach is key to reaching a more comprehensive understanding of people’s credibility assessments within the information-abundant online environment.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Kim, S., "“Questioners’ credibility judgments of answers in a social question and answer site.” Information Research, 15(1)"

2 USC-Annenberg School Center for the Digital Future, "“Online World as Important to Internet Users as Real World?" USC-Annenberg Digital Future Project"

3 Sundin, O., & Francke, H., "“In search of credibility: Pupils' information practices in learning environments.” Information Research, 14(4)"

4 Fogg, B. J., "What makes web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study" 61-68, 2001

5 O'Reilly, T., "What is Web 2.0?"

6 Barry, C. L., "User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study" 45 (45): 149-159, 1994

7 Rieh, S. Y., "Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW" 279-289, 1998

8 Hong, T., "The influence of structural and message features on Web site credibility" 57 (57): 114-127, 2006

9 Flanagin, A. J., "The credibility of volunteered geographic information" 72 (72): 137-148, 2008

10 Sundar, S. S., "The MAIN Model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. in : Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility" MIT Press 73-100, 2008

11 Wilson, P., "Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority" Greenwood Press 1983

12 Roper, B., "Public attitudes toward television and other media in a time of change" Television Information Office 1985

13 Fogg, B. J., "Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online" 722-723, 2003

14 Fogg, B. J., "Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do" Morgan Kaufmann 2003

15 Rieh, S. Y., "On the Web at home: Information seeking and Web searching in the home environment" 55 (55): 743-753, 2004

16 Janes, J. W., "Networked information retrieval and organization: Issues and questions" 47 (47): 711-715, 1996

17 Mashek, J. W, "Lethargy ’96: How the Media Covered a Listless Campaign" 1997

18 Rieh, S. Y., "Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web" 53 (53): 145-161, 2002

19 Kubey, R., "Experience Sampling Method [1] application to communication research questions" 46 (46): 99-120, 1996

20 Flanagin, A. J., "Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. in : Digital media, youth, and credibility" The MIT Press 5-27, 2008

21 Newhagen, J., "Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news" 66 (66): 277-284, 1989

22 Hilligoss, B., "Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context" 44 (44): 1467-1484, 2008

23 Johnson, T. J., "Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures" 75 (75): 325-340, 1998

24 Rieh, S. Y., "Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. in : Annual Review of Information Science and Technology V.41" Information Today 307-364, 2007

25 Lankes, R. D., "Credibility on the internet: Shifting from authority to reliability" 64 (64): 667-686, 2008

26 Metzger, M. J., "Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment" 27 : 293-335, 2003

27 Rieh, S. Y., "Credibility and cognitive authority of information. in : Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences" Taylor and Francis Group 1337-1344, 1344

28 Hovland, C. I., "Communication and persuasion" Yale University Press 1953

29 Rieh, S. Y., "College students’ credibility judgments in the information seeking process. in : Digital media, youth, and credibility" The MIT Press 49-72, 2008

30 Wathen, C. N., "Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web" 53 (53): 134-144, 2002

31 Robins, D., "Aesthetics and credibility in Web design" 44 (44): 386-399, 2008

32 Rieh, S. Y., "A diary study of credibility assessment in everyday life information activities on the Web: Preliminary findings" 2010

33 Cool, C., "A classification of interactions with information" Libraries Unlimited 1-15, 2002